Discuss the difference between a contributory negligence state and a comparative negligence state. Find a case online that addresses one of these defenses and discuss the case as part of your answer.

Consider the virtues of engineering. In particular, you should think about two central virtues: Honesty and Integrity. Why are these virtues important in a professional context? In what ways do they represent excellence in character? In what ways are engineers professionally obligated to cultivate these virtues?

(400 words atleast)

Q1:What is the difference between X and Xc? How do they relate to the brain and the mind. Discuss 2 design implications of X and Xc.

Q2:Define Human Information Processing. Provide one example of how it effects systems interaction.

Q3:What are the characteristics of working memory? What is the difference between working memory and short term memory? How does working memory relate to mental workload?

Q4:Dr. Jones was recently awarded for her successful Cancer Treatment clinic. She is known to be able to accurately detect breast cancer from mammograms about 80% of the time. After receiving her award, Dr. Jones really wants to increase her accuracy rate even more, because she wants her clinic to be recognized again next year. According to SDT, if the true rate of cancer and her patient population remained the same, what is most likely to happen to Dr. Jones’ diagnoses:

Joe, Jacinta, Mohammed, and Tiffany are all on the list to receive a kidney donation. A kidney has just come available that is compatible with each of them. This would be his/her first transplant. None of them are or have been drug or alcohol abusers. Joe is a 25 yr-old fairly healthy successful defense attorney who has been on the list for only three months. Jacinta is a 15 yr-old physically fit honors student who wants to be a doctor. She has been on the list for just a month. Mohammed is a 50 yr-old high school history teacher (loved by his students) in poor health. He has been on the list for a year. Tiffany is a 30 yr-old housewife (with three young children) in fair health. She has been on the list for a year and a half. Use one of the theories listed above to explain and demonstrate the process you (as the person who determines who will get the kidney) use to decide who will receive the kidney. The only rules for getting the kidney are the ones you make. According to your analysis, what would be the morally correct thing to do? Why? (In other words, for whichever theory you choose, explain not only the process but the result of having used that process.)

The theories you may choose from are: Natural Law Theory, Virtue Ethics (list the virtues), Ethics of Prima Facie Duty (list the duties)

Complete the X-Y Questionnaire located at the end of chapter 1 in Organization Behavior in Health Care. Write a summary of your self-evaluation. Why it is important for managers and leaders to understand organizational behavior? What are the advantages of understanding one's management style for managers, leaders, and the organization? Reply

1. Discuss the six approaches to prejudice. Please include in your answer the Historical, Sociocultural, Situational, Psychodynamic, Phenomenological, and the Earned Reputation emphases.

2. How does urban insecurity play a part in prejudice? What is the frustration theory? Compare these two.

In your own words, how do you describe ethics?

For each of the following three lifespan research approaches, design a study to test the hypothesis, "as people age they become smarter."

1.Cross-sectional

2.Longitudinal

3.Sequential

1. Identify and describe the key structures and functions of a neuron

2. Discuss how communication among the neurons takes place including

how an action potential is generated within the neuron

3. Identify and describe the two major divisions of the nervous system

including all subcomponents and functions (central and peripheral;

somatic and autonomic)

A clinical psychologist was interested in how different parenting styles might affect the incidence of neurosis in adults.    Based on observations of her own clients over many years, she hypothesized that unstructured and lax child rearing environments were more likely to result in adult neurosis than well structured and disciplined child rearing.   She created a 20-item questionnaire that asked subjects about their own childhood experiences and also their neurotic tendencies.   She obtained a small government grant to cover the costs of administering the survey through the mail to residents in three large metropolitan areas on the east coast.

From these answers she rated each parenting style along a 1 to 5 scale that varied from very unstructured (1) to very structured (5).   In addition, she rated each participant along a 1 to 5 scale that reflected their degree of neurosis from low levels of neurotic behavior (1) to high levels of neurotic behavior (5).

What study is this?

Independent/dependent variable is?

How many groups of participants were there?

What type of ststistic can most likely be used to analyze the data? What is the hypothesized outcome?

Can you think of another way to test the hypothesis?

What are some potential criticisms of the study?

1.Discuss the nature versus nurture debate and its relevance to psychology

2. Describe how the process of development begins including the key

elements of development (chromosomes, DNA, etc.)

3. Discuss the significance of twin research to the field of psychology and

what scientists have discovered about the similarities and differences of

identical twins

4. Discuss the origins of the gender differences scientists have discovered in

humans

Why do androgyny relationships allow individuals to cope effectively in a varity of situations? Explain this reasoning conceptually and include one example.

What are the risk and causal factors associated with schzophrenia?

Chapter 13, Abnormal Psychology, 16 edition