Question

This comes from the Columbia University website: “As an equal opportunity and affirmative action employer, the University does not discriminate against or permit harassment of employees or applicants for employment on the basis of race, color, sex, gender (including gender identity and expression), pregnancy, religion, creed, national origin, age, alienage and citizenship, status as a perceived or actual victim of domestic violence, disability, marital status, sexual orientation, military status, partnership status, genetic predisposition or carrier status, arrest record, or any other legally protected status.”

1. Are there any characteristics that really shouldn’t be on the list? Which ones? Why?
   
2. Hypothetically, John Smith has applied for a maintenance post at Columbia. The job entails routine and emergency plumbing and fixing of general problems, everything from burned-out light bulbs to graffiti. More or less, the job is to walk around and make sure things are in working order. He’d be working the night shift from 11 p.m. to 7 a.m. His assigned buildings would be a classroom and three coed dorms. He has been arrested three times for attempted rape of young women, but there was never enough evidence to convict.
   • Susan Rieger heads the Columbia University employment office. It’s part of her job to defend the school’s policies. In ethical terms, how do you suppose she might defend Columbia’s refusal to discriminate on the basis of arrest record?

Answer 1

Answer1:

Characteristics like race, sex, color, gender, national origin, age as they're a part of our temperament and can't be modified.

Answer2:

We have recently seen similar cases in our country, particularly with decide Kavanaugh. It’s understood that this is often a tough and peculiar state of affairs to be found in. it's tacit that Captain John Smith already got the duty, as he was assigned to buildings and lecture rooms to require care of. Taking this into thought, I will assume that Susan Rieger followed the principles of innocent till tried guilty. As there wasn't enough proof for conviction, there aren’t any bases to not rent him if he fits the duty consequently. Some folks will argue that one wrongful accusation is intelligible, however, three square measure one thing to require care of, and he ought to be met with discretion. The actual fact that he was assigned work hours as traffic is low and folks tend to be lonely is reckless in my opinion. There have been no convictions; however, accusations have to be compelled to be taken into thought. Day time work throughout high traffic hours would is ideal.