Write a compare and contrast parapgraph on Michgain and Califorina. 8 sentences minimum.

Questions: If you were manager of learning and development at Rockwell Collins, where would you start in
your efforts to improve the availability and effectiveness of company-sponsored training efforts?

What suggestions would you have concerning how training is
designed and provided?
Furthermore, what suggestions do you have concerning who should provide the
training (i.e., in-house trainers versus outside vendors)?

Finally, how would you seek to “sell” your recommendations to top management?

describe the interactions that influence cognitive comprehension. consider the connection of social cognitive theory to cognitive comprehension.

Explain how these interactions work well together

describe what happens when these interactions are in conflict with one another.

Some issues receive significant attention from decision makers. Why might these issues easily find their way onto decision makers' agendas?

explain practical implications of state dependent memory by Gordon Bower? explain each point in detail.

Imagine that we could use brain simulator implants to achieve control over patients experiencing emotional difficulties. For example, we could treat depression, bipolar, schizophrenia, etc. without needing medication or counseling. What about the idea of implanting electrodes in the pleasure centers of newly born infants? If these electrodes could be used to soothe a crying baby, treat a mental disorder or to treat drug addictions in teenagers and adults, would there be any disadvantages? If so, what may they be? Would the disadvantage outweigh the advantages? Would you be willing to volunteer your own child or yourself for implantation

14. Match the term with the relevant example.

______  multiculturalism                         a.  a baseline for measuring this is provided by      

                                                                              The Universal Declaration of Human  Rights

___ __     soft power                                  b.   marketing messages that shape ideals about the                                                                           

                                                                              Human body through mass media

______    global culture                             c.   Puerto Ricans of New York City have their own  

                                                                              Barrio with distinctive cultural traits and strong        

                                                                              group identity.   

______    pluralism                                   d. Japanese students in blue jeans take a break from

                                                                             their studies to have a Big Mac

______  structural violence                        e . a country allows groups in the society to choose

                                                                             between their own established rules of divorce/    

                                                                             property settlement and those of the majority.

What was the underlying motive for the brutality that infused the Khmer Rouge regime in Cambodia in the late 1970s? How has the legacy of the Khmer Rouge continued to impede the establishment of a stable regime in Cambodia?

wite 3-5 senctences response to this post in your own words .

COLLAPSE

Genetic treatment is is gene therapy, which is using genetic material to help fight a disease, it is for the health and well being of the patient. Genetic enhancement is adjusting the genetic makeup of a person by using genetic material to do so.

Summarize Glannon, Savulescu, and Sandel’s reasons for considering genetic enhancement ethically acceptable or unacceptable.

Glannon finds genetic enhancement as an unfair advantage, and is against it ethically.  Savulescu finds it important to continue to strive for the best in terms of enhancement. Sandel believes is is exactly opposite of what Savulescu suggests, as his case strongly suggests that there are many things wrong with enhancing the human race.

I personally believe that Genetic enhancement does give people an unfair advantage, as we would find people with money to find power in everything about enhancing their bodies. We would find men and women who would be unattainable in beauty standards as well as people who are genetically enhanced much stronger. With strength, this would eliminate natural selection in terms of athletes being able to try out for professional teams, people who have actual natural strength and abilities, as they would be competing against genetically enhanced people who would be more inclined to run faster, or throw harder, etc. We also do not know or understand the implications of genetically enhanced people and future generations, as we do not know what these changes will do with future genetic formulations. What if a genetically enhanced person breeds with a non enhanced person? What if two genetically enhanced people breed and we find that it is very detrimental to future viability of the offspring? I think it is a very interesting idea, and maybe we should be able to understand it more in the future by testing it, BUT I honestly do not feel as though I would ever want to see these kinds of options available to my children. We spend a lot of years learning to accept ourselves now, how hard would it be for future generations to feel desire or greatness in themselves if they were consistently failing in comparison to these altered beings?

Information regarding policies on short- and long-term suspensions of students in a public school. Summarizing the due process requirements prior to a short-term and a long-term suspension of a student Are the due process procedures for a short-term and a long-term suspension of a student the same or different? Are these requirements consistent with Goss v. Lopez? Support your position with examples from case law, the U.S. Constitution,

What is a social problem? Explain why it is important to keep the social context of the social problem in mind when analyzing the problem for a cause or correlation. Explain how research is used to describe the social context of a social problem.

Enter into the debate yourselves by providing your own opinion on whether or not correct grammar is always necessary. Consider the following questions as you construct your post: Do you feel that grammar is a reflection of intelligence? Could "bad" grammar possibly be a reflection of something else? (Discuss one of the intersecting privileges that Fabello argues reinforces our concept of "correct" grammar.) How do you feel when you notice improper grammar when someone is speaking and/or writing? Conversely, how do you feel when someone corrects your grammar? Are you appreciative, annoyed, etc? Do you feel that we should always practice good grammar, or do you believe that grammar is conditional and should only be heeded in certain scenarios? In other words, is it permissible to use "improper" grammar with friends or family and not permissible to use in school, on the job, etc?

explain the importance of constitution for a country. Expanded

Reflecting on the material found in Chapter 11, focusing on mental illness, mental treatment & care, and the enormous challenges that we face in our communities today

due to  undiagnosed/untreated mental health issues, respond to the following question:

What evidence is  there (from scientific research and statistics) that mental illness is one of our most pervasive public health problems today?

Have you seen evidence of this in our communities? Provide a current example...

Be sure to provide facts and data from your reading of Chapter 11 and any data on mental health from the CDC (Center for Disease Control) and/or NYSOMH (NYS Office of Mental Health) that is useful in connecting your example and viewpoint.

The purpose of this exercise is to practice writing an abstract of an academic work. An abstract is a concise summary of the topic, goals, content, and argument of an academic work. Learning to write a good abstract is a key step in developing a critique of an academic work—you cannot provide a good critique of an article or book until you are able to first summarize the author’s argument and the evidence she uses to support it.

Assignment:

For this exercise, write a 150-200 word abstract of chapter 5 (“The Phenomenology of Terror”) in Buried Secrets by Victoria Sanford.

Your goal is to provide a succinct summary of: the topic of the chapter, Sanford’s thesis in the chapter, and the data she uses to support it.

Guidelines:

The first sentence(s) should describe accurately and concisely the main theme of the chapter: What is it about? What is the main topic??Where, when, and with whom was the research done?

The following sentence(s) should concisely state the author’s thesis and how she argues her position. Remember that a thesis must be stated in the form of an argument, not a statement of fact.

The next sentence(s) should briefly outline the information that the author uses to support her thesis. For example, is the data ethnographic or is it historical or a combination of both? Does the author draw primarily on media sources or did she conduct interviews? With whom did she conduct interviews and why? How does the author present or organize her data to support her case?

Your abstract should end with a summary of the implications of the chapter: Why is this chapter significant? What does the author accomplish or hope to accomplish by presenting this data?