I WANT YOU TO POST MOST COMMONLY USED QUESTİONS AND ITS SOLUTIONS WHİCH ARE FORECASTİNG, CAPACITY PLANNING AND DECISION THEORY. PLEASE DO IT:D

A foundation of operations in both manufacturing and service environments is vital in order to drive inefficiencies and examine ways to achieve greater supply chain integration with suppliers and customers. In this assignment, you will compare one manufacturing and one service driven company through creating visual representations of how the product or service is created and delivered, accompanied by a written summary. Select two companies of interest, one manufacturing company (e.g., a shoe company) and one service company (e.g., a technical support company). Provide a brief summary of each company including compelling evidence illustrating the company is either a manufacturing or a service company. Avoid selecting a company that could be arguably both. Manufacturing Research the manufacturing process for the selected company. Create a manufacturing process map. Explain the elements of infrastructure for the manufacturing company using flow charts and be sure to provide a key. Cite three to five sources to support your process map. Service Research the service process for the selected company. Create a service process map. Explain the elements of infrastructure for the service company using flow charts and be sure to provide a key. Cite three to five sources to support your process map. Summary Provide a 750-word summary describing the differences and similarities between manufacturing and service environments. For each company, identify if customer-introduced variability is available. If not, how would you implement flexibility for customer-introduced variability?

Please no Elkay examples and can you make the flow chart bigger.

Question : What is your opinion of the extent of cellphone search that should be allowed incident to an arrest? If evidence of other crimes is found on a seized phone, should it be admissible? Supreme Court Considers Limits On Warrantless Cellphone Searches

by Nina Totenberg (Links to an external site.)

April 29, 2014 4:03 PM ET

Listen to the Story

All Things Considered

In a case that reaches into almost every American's pocket or purse, the U.S. Supreme Court struggled Tuesday to adapt modern technology to traditional legal rules. At issue was whether police can search cellphones without obtaining a warrant at the time of an arrest.

The courts have long allowed police to search people without a warrant when making an arrest. But those searches have been limited by the amount of information individuals could carry on their persons.

Now, suddenly, with the advent of the smartphone, allowing a search of that phone without a warrant allows police to search more information than most people keep in their houses.

The case before the court Tuesday illustrates both the dangers and advantages of warrantless searches. In 2009, David Riley was pulled over for driving with expired tags in San Diego. When his car was impounded and inventoried, police found guns under the hood.

An initial search of Riley's cellphone indicated he might be involved in gang activity. Two hours later, a gang investigator went through the digital files and downloaded contacts, videos and photos. Some of that information was later used to convict Riley of several felonies.

At Tuesday's Supreme Court argument, Riley's lawyer, Jeffrey Fisher, told the justices that the Founding Fathers never intended to allow such wide-ranging searches without a warrant. The warrantless search at the time of arrest, he noted, was to protect the officer's safety and to prevent the destruction of evidence.

Chief Justice John Roberts asked what would be gained by getting a warrant. If you are arresting someone on suspicion of being a gang member, and you have evidence to support that, he asked, "what part of the cellphone is not likely to have pertinent evidence?"

Fisher replied that "It's not just what can be looked at," it's the fact that information from cellphones can be downloaded and kept in "ever-growing databases." The beauty of the search warrant, he said, is not only that there is a neutral magistrate who reviews the warrant application and can limit the search, but that the magistrate can also limit the retention of the downloaded information if it is not used to prosecute a crime.

Justice Anthony Kennedy turned to the question of diaries, and how the courts have in the past treated diaries carried by people at the time of arrest. Fisher replied that there have been few, if any, cases in which police, prior to the advent of cellphones, seized a diary at the time of an arrest, because people simply did not carry their diaries with them. Today, he said, "We live in a world where everybody has everything with them at all times."

Including criminals, interjected Kennedy — criminals "who are more dangerous, more sophisticated, more elusive with cellphones."

Representing the police and prosecutors in the case was California Solicitor General Edward DuMont. He noted that, as Justice Samuel Alito had observed, there is no doubt police could examine photos in a billfold at the time of an arrest.

If that is a reasonable search that doesn't require a warrant, said DuMont, it doesn't become "constitutionally unreasonable " simply because Riley carried photos in digital form instead.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor interrupted to note that a billfold contains somewhere between one and five photos, versus a cellphone, which contains "potentially thousands."

Justice Elena Kagan observed that a person can be arrested "for anything," including driving without a seat belt, and the police could search that person's cellphone and "look at every single email" — including "very intimate communications" — as well as medical data, calendar and GPS information to learn everyplace the person has recently been.

"Now," said Kagan, "that strikes me as a very different kind of world than the kind of world ... where somebody has pictures of their family in a billfold."

"One can always think of marginal cases where there might be concern," replied DuMont.

"You call it marginal, but in fact, most people now do carry their lives on their cellphones," Kagan shot back.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg focused on the task at hand. The court "has to make a rule" that works not just for Riley's case but for everyone who is arrested, she said.

Kennedy took up the challenge. Let's leave out emergency circumstances, he said, because police can always search in those cases without a warrant. So, leaving those out, he asked DuMont, what's your rule?

The state's lawyer suggested that the cellphone can be searched as a tool to protect the police officer's safety.

"Do you have any example where a phone was used to trigger a bomb or something like that?" asked Roberts.

DuMont did not have any such examples, but he pointed to a case where an officer became more alert when he stopped someone for speeding and saw on the driver's cellphone a photo of the man posing with guns.

Kennedy tried a different approach. Could the court make a distinction between serious and nonserious offenses? But DuMont noted that the court has never been willing to make that distinction before.

Justice Antonin Scalia suggested that the rule could limit the search to material relevant to the crime for which the person is arrested.

But DuMont wanted a broader rule. He said no warrant should be required for any information that is "of the same sort" that police have traditionally been able to seize without a warrant — diaries, letters, photographs — when carried by an individual.

"That would mean absolutely everything, wouldn't it?" responded Kagan.

"The problem here is the amount of information on cellphones," added Justice Stephen Breyer.

DuMont replied that people make a choice — they "choose" when they carry their cellphones with them — and thus they should have "no expectation of privacy" if they are arrested.

Kagan, incredulous: "Are you saying one has to keep a cellphone at home to have an expectation of privacy?"

Last up to argue was Deputy Solicitor General Michael Dreeben, representing the federal government. He repeatedly told the justices that the potential for destruction of evidence is "real," and that law enforcement is very worried in particular about the sophisticated encryption on modern smartphones. That encryption, he said, can mean that once a phone is locked, it will take months to unlock it, if it is ever possible.

Dreeben didn't offer examples, but predicted an "arms race" between cops and criminals in the future over such technology.

A decision in the case is expected by late June.

Answer the following question in a minimum of two paragraphs.

Bob wants to form a company with Bill but is concern about expenses and taxes. Bill is known to be careless with money and seems to always have debt issues. If you were to advise Bob, what you recommend regarding his options in forming a business (partnership, corporation, Limited Liability Company)? Explain the consequences of your options.

There are MANY versions of MySQL in production (and in some cases, test) environments. Why is this? Why not just upgrade as soon as possible? Why are commands depreciated? How does this effect tutorials, books and training sites? What impact can be seen from an open-source project being under the control of a commercial company? Show some examples of what may occur. What can you do to keep YOUR database from having issues in the future? Can you future proof? Discuss these and any other issues you may come up with related to MySQL.

Discuss the strength and weakness of ICICI Prudential Mutual fund

What are some potential ideas that Tata Starbucks can implement to minimize the competitive threat that an improved Costa Coffee will bring to the Indian market? Develop and explain

1. What is capacity cushion and how does it impact utilization?

2. What information is needed to calculate capacity requirements for a machine that has to produce

   multiple products?

Why politicians needed companies like Odebrecht to win elections?

Why do you think Odebrecht needed politicians to win contracts?

In the new Coke fiasco, how could coca cola's marketing have been improved? Be as specific as you can.

is holacracy successful organization system

Please discuss the cost of quality as a combination of cost of conformance and cost of no conformance

What should be included in a Risk Management Policy?