In: Finance
The Titanic Shipbuilding Company has a noncancelable contract to
build a small cargo vessel. Construction involves a cash outlay of
$268,000 at the end of each of the next two years. At the end of
the third year the company will receive payment of $620,000. Assume
the IRR of this option exceeds the cost of capital.
The company can speed up construction by working an extra shift. In
this case there will be a cash outlay of $580,000 at the end of the
first year followed by a cash payment of $620,000 at the end of the
second year. Use the IRR rule to show the (approximate) range of
opportunity costs of capital at which the company should work the
extra shift. (Enter your answers as a percent rounded to 2
decimal places. Enter the smallest percent first.)
The company should work the extra shift if the cost of capital is between _______% and _____%.
I know the first blank is 22.82%, I just can't figure out the second one.
Cash flow for scenario 1:
Year 1: -268,000
Year 2: -268,000
Year 3: +620,000
Cash flow for Scenario 2:
Year 1: -580,000
Year 2: +620,000
Year 3: 0
Now, let us calculate differential of the cashflow
-
Year 1: -580,000 - (-268,000) = -312,000
Year 2: 620,000 -(-268,000) = +888,000
Year 3: 0 - 620,000 = -620,000
Assume that IRR for differential cash flow is r.
Setup the equation for IRR -
0 = -312,000 + 888,000/(1+r) - 620,000/(1+r)2
let us assume (1+r) = x
so equation becomes, after replacing 1+r and cancelling
zero's
312 - 888/x + 620/x2 = 0
Multiply whole equation by x2
312x2 - 888x + 620 = 0
Solve the quadratic equation -
ax2 + bx + c = 0,
with two solutions -
x1 =
x2 =
in our case,
a = 312
b = -888
c = 620
so,
=
= 121.5895
x1 = (888 - 121.5895)/(2*312) = 1.22822
x2 = (888 + 121.5895)/(2*312) = 1.61793
so,
1 + r = 1.22822 OR r = 22.82%
or 1 + r = 1.61793 OR r = 61.79%
So,
The company should work the extra shift if the cost of
capital is between ___22.82____% and __61.79___%.
Important Note:
1. This is a classic case of multiple IRRs for a series of
cashflow. When Cashflow changes sign more than once, multiple IRRs
are possible. In this case sign of cashflow changed from negative
to positive from 1st to 2nd year, then positive to negative again
in 2nd to 3rd year. Because sign changed twice, we had a
possibility of 2 IRRs.
2. It can be verified in excel that at cost of capital less than
22.82% and more than 61.79%, NPV of differential cashflow is
negative, it is only positive when cost of capital is in between
these values.
3. Curve between Cost of Capital and NPV looks like below in this
case, where range of cost of capital for positive NPV can be seen
-
(X-axis --> cost of capital)
(y-axis --> NPV)
Values in excel can be setup like below -
Values in excel look like below -
Screenshot shows value only till 27%, but formulas have been
written till 80% of cost of capital.