In: Psychology
how does Scientific Racism and meritocracy contribute to eugentics?
Explain what scientific racism + eurastocy is and Eugentics are
seperatly.
How do they come together? Who is deserving? How do they support
eachother's world views?
Scientific Racism is the field of study that examines people from various races and brand their genetic make-up with their intelligence, talent and development, whereas, Meritocracy is a field that suggests that only people who are talented should be given leadership positions. These two fields have created a new school of thought and field which promotes ethnic cleansing by promoting the off springs of people who are considered to be genetically inferior.
Again there is a Hidler mind-set that white Europeans
are more intelligent than all the other races are inferior to the
Europeans. This is also an absurd thought process because if one
narrow’s down the meaning of intelligence only to the technological
advancements, they are mistaken. Living in a forest along with the
nature, hunting and farming are all superior tasks as for the human
beings are considered. The so called civilized are not civilized
and their civilization stops with the word civilized, in action
it’s only inaction.
Every individual who is born in this world is a warrior who fought
millions of one’s competitors in order to reach the womb on time.
So once they have come out, they are branded as not abled, not
talented, not skilled and not fit for reproduction from another’s
point of view. No one has the right to decide who will live in this
world. There were dictators and wars that aimed at ethnic cleansing
in the name of superiority. All these wars and violence are part of
human beings ignorance and scientists who support ethnic cleansing
are not human beings at all. The genetic alterations are only
suitable for curing any physical and mental disabilities but it
shouldn’t be used as a tool to brand someone as useless or
inferior.