Question

In: Biology

do you think we should be testing on animal and using them for research?

do you think we should be testing on animal and using them for research?

Solutions

Expert Solution

Yes.

Animal testing, also known as animal experimentation, animal research and in vivo testing, is the use of non-human animals in experiments that seek to control the variables that affect the behavior or biological system under study. This approach can be contrasted with field studies in which animals are observed in their natural environments. Experimental research with animals is usually conducted in universities, medical schools, pharmaceutical companies, defense establishments and commercial facilities that provide animal-testing services to industry.[1]The focus of animal testing varies on a continuum from pure research, focusing on developing fundamental knowledge of an organism, to applied research, which may focus on answering some question of great practical importance, such as finding a cure for a disease.

Antibiotics, insulin, vaccines for polio and cervical cancer, organ transplantation, HIV treatments, heart-bypass surgery - it reads like an A to Z of medical progress. But these major advances have something in common: they were all developed and tested using animals.

Animal experimentation is a contentious issue, but it boils down to two essential questions: does it work, and is it ethical?

The first is easy to answer: it works. Some would have you believe there are alternatives for all animal research, or that animal testing is always misleading and unsafe. These are fallacies.

Where there are reliable alternatives, of course, we use them - that's what the law demands. Magnetic resonance imaging, computer models and work on isolated tissues and cell cultures can be useful; but they cannot provide the answers that animal research can.

NO ONE chooses to use animals where there is no need. It gives no one any pleasure, and it is time consuming, expensive and - quite rightly - subject to layers of regulation. Yet it is still the best way of finding out what causes disease, and of knowing whether new treatments will be safe and effective.

Biologically, we are similar to species such as mice and rats, because we have practically the same set of genes. Their bodies respond to disease and treatments much as ours do. If a genetically modified "purple tomato" can fight cancer in mice, as announced yesterday, it might work for humans, too.

Medical research is an arduous process. By the time a therapy reaches the patient, it is easy to forget just how important animals were in its development. Patients might not know that the powerful new drugs Avastin (for bowel, breast and lung cancer) and Herceptin (for breast cancer) were developed after research on mice.

In fact, animal research has contributed to 70 per cent of Nobel prizes for physiology or medicine. Without it, we would - medically speaking - be stuck in the Dark Ages.


Related Solutions

do you think we should be testing on animal and using them for research? explain why?
do you think we should be testing on animal and using them for research? explain why?
Probiotics: Do You Need Them? What do you think? Do you think you should add probiotics...
Probiotics: Do You Need Them? What do you think? Do you think you should add probiotics to your diet? Why or why not? Do you think we know enough about probiotics to recommend them to the public? Site your source
What do you think the psychological testing should measure especially in this case and is it...
What do you think the psychological testing should measure especially in this case and is it necessary for this job? (facebooke) In every selecting process, HR managers look for a fit. Which fit is more applicable to this case and why? (facebooke) Facebook should standardized their testing to ensure reliability. Can you explain this further? answer them after reading the case Qn#4: Psychological testing did not seem to be part of Facebook's selection process. How might it use this testing,...
Should we continue to measure GDP as we do now? If you don’t think it should...
Should we continue to measure GDP as we do now? If you don’t think it should be changed, explain your reasoning. If you think it should be changed, what changes would you recommend, and why?
why should animal testing be illegal? advantages and disadvantages of making animal testing illegal? word count...
why should animal testing be illegal? advantages and disadvantages of making animal testing illegal? word count : 1000-1200 words subject : rhetorical and composition course
How do you think we should change how we do elections in the United States to...
How do you think we should change how we do elections in the United States to increase participation? Are traditionally low voter turnouts a problem for our democracy? Should everyone vote, or be allowed to vote?
a- Do you believe in animal testing, even with the specific guidelines that are required to...
a- Do you believe in animal testing, even with the specific guidelines that are required to be followed? b-If you were to participate in a scientific research study as a subject, what, if anything, would cause you to decide to opt out? Why?
Do you think we are expecting too much of healthcare providers to require them to be...
Do you think we are expecting too much of healthcare providers to require them to be good communicators – and also be able to provide good technical quality of care? Why or why not?
Do you think we should be worried about the size of the federal debt? Why or...
Do you think we should be worried about the size of the federal debt? Why or why not?
Which of the steps involved in historical research that we have described do you think would...
Which of the steps involved in historical research that we have described do you think would be the hardest to complete? The easiest? Why? Explain your answers.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT