Question

does protecting minority rights mean people should have the personal freedom to do whatever they want or does it refer to specific rights?

Answer 1

"In the event that it be conceded that a man having outright power may abuse that power by wronging his enemies, for what reason ought not a dominant part be obligated to a similar rebuke? Men do not change their characters by joining with each other; nor does their understanding in the nearness of obstructions increment with their quality. For my own part, I can't trust it; the ability to do everything which I should decline to one of my equivalents, I will never allow to any number of them."

Popular government along these lines requires minority rights similarly as it does lion's share run the show. To be sure, as vote based system is seen today, the minority's rights must be ensured regardless of how estranged a minority is from the larger part society; generally, the greater part's rights lose their importance.

Minority rights are the typical individual rights as connected to individuals from racial, ethnic, class, religious, etymological or sex and sexual minorities; and furthermore the aggregate rights concurred to minority gatherings. Minority rights may likewise apply just to singular privileges of any individual who isn't a piece of a dominant part choice.

In each bona fide vote based system today, greater part administer is both supported and constrained by the incomparable law of the constitution, which ensures the privileges of people. Oppression by minority over the larger part is banned, yet so is oppression of the dominant part against minorities.