Question

Why is two-way communication with a patient more effective than instruction that is one-way ( from the HCP to the patient only )?

Answer 1

One way communication is exceedingly organized; the sender is in charge, and expects and gets next to no reaction.

Two way communications requires both sender and recipient to take an interest in the collaboration. It takes into consideration trade amongst you and the patient, it addresses the issues of both you and the patient, and set up a putting stock in relationship.

Two way communications is best

There're numerous points of interest and detriments to one and two way correspondences. Be that as it may, it's simply the matter of who is at leverage or hindrance. Only correspondence, the sender is passing on a message to beneficiaries without anticipating that the collectors should make inquiries about it. This takes the collectors in an inconvenience in light of the fact that the gatherings of people frequently trust that there're no further profundity to the message senders give. Now and again the recipients may even comprehend the message in an unexpected way. In any case, two interchanges, collectors can make inquiries about the message. Along these lines the message is all the more obvious to the beneficiaries and they won't botch the message senders endeavor to give.

The upsides of two-way interchanges are that the senders and the collectors get the chance to talk about what they might want. For instance if in excess of a couple of individuals remark to the Pepsi executive that their business was bad, the chief will have an opportunity to tune in to their thoughts and make another business, that way the crowd and the executive will get what they need (for instance the gathering of people gets great advertisements and Pepsi while the chief gets cash.