Question

Describe the evidence of the stages of group development, the role of status within the group and the six properties of a group from the movie 12 Angry Men.

From the film 12 Angry Men explain the stages of group development, the role of status within the group and describe the six properties of a group as related to the jurors in the movie.

Answer 1

By victimization the film twelve Angry Men, the goal of this project was to capture the essence of psychotherapy and also the dynamics that area unit concerned. victimization the 1957 original version, the film revolves round the deliberations of AN all-White all-male jury World Health Organization is tasked with deciding the fate of AN eighteen year recent Latino male that has been suspect of stabbing his father to death. The gravity of the case is just heighted by the actual fact that a guilty finding would mechanically need the imposition of the execution. within the apparently obvious case, eleven of the panelists originally vote for guilty with solely juror range eight (Mr. Davis) casting a guiltless finding. though originally forged for the sake of initiating a discussion, the following deliberations offer a backcloth for the audience within which to look at the cluster member’s characteristics as they start to unfold. because the audience watches and thru their interactions, the jurors’ complicated personalities (which vary from wise, bright, and empathic to chesty, prejudiced, and merciless), preconceptions, backgrounds and interactions began to require form.

In the film, students of counsel area unit ready to read AN social approach to cluster counsel. below this approach, the main focus of the counsel relationship is on the client’s social relationships (in this case a member of a jury) and not on their childhood or past experiences (Yalom, 1995). moreover, Yalom (1995) proposes that parataxic or social distortions or not solely supported past relationships, however conjointly on distortions of reality that emerge out of social desires. These distortions area unit evident throughout the picture show as several of the characters categorical terribly robust and immediate likes or dislikes for every alternative typically through angry and heated exchanges. Such heated exchanges provide the counsel student the opportunities to vicariously expertise the usually intense anger of cluster members because it unfolds.

Stages of cluster Development

Gladding (2012) counsel that teams evolve in an exceedingly healthy manner, disintegrate because of an absence of care, or finally end up in some style of chaos. the fact is that each one teams, each healthy and unhealthy ones, bear variety of organic process stages that ranges from four to 6 distinct phases. Not all theoretician, however, agree, that stages should and do exist. yet, for the needs of this paper, i will be able to demonstrate the event of teams victimisation the jurors from the picture show twelve Angry Men as printed by Tuckman (1965) and Tuckman and writer (1997) projected 5 stages.

Stage 1: Forming phase

During the forming stage, initial caution is prevailing and cluster members tend to need to be accepted and check out and avoid confrontation so as to avoid rejection. Initial conversations tend to be superficial and area unit targeted on events that don't typically pertain to the cluster. within the picture show, the decide is truly leading the forming stage because the jury is receiving its directions. Clear to the viewer that these men area unit strangers to every alternative, the viewer is additionally tuned in to the juror’s realization that they're tasked with a heavy responsibility of returning to agreement regarding the guilt or innocence of this young man.

Stage 2: Norming phase

According to Tuckman (1965) the norming stage truly begins early within the method and should if truth be told overlap with alternative stages. throughout this stage, the institution of all of the principles and bounds area unit incorporated and exist on each the acutely aware and unconscious levels. associated with cluster formation, this stage refers to the inner workings and pointers of the cluster that area unit most frequently exhibited through their behaviors.

When comparison this stage to the cluster, the decide through his directions to the jury is basically establishing a collection of outwardly provided norms. at the same time, cluster members conjointly taciturnly begin to assess the behaviors of their fellow jurors in an endeavor to determine the general climate of the cluster. because the cluster begins its task of deliberations and also the jurors begin to ask one another, a lot of of the members begin to a lot of externally show themselves through their beliefs and biases. The results of these interactions is that the cluster settles upon a usually command accepted set of rules of behaviors that tend to be accepted by everybody. For this cluster, a norm of quality and phaseicipation is fairly quickly prescribed at some level (Tuckman, 1965; Tuckman & Jenson, 1977).

Stage 3: Storming phase

The cluster of twelve men is sequestered in an exceedingly rather dingy trying area with their solely link to the skin world provided by the functionary. the space is extraordinarily heat and their perception of an absence of air-con solely adds to their growing level of physical and emotional discomfort. The panelists prepare themselves around an extended table and also the initial method comment is formed once one juror notices that the door has been secured. This secured door is a gaggle symbolism that they're going to stay isolated along as a gaggle till their task is ultimately completed. This observation conjointly functions as a link because the cluster moves to the storming stage.

During this phase of the cluster method, personal agendas area unit dropped at the forefront as members begin to need to force the completion of the task for varied reasons. as an example, panelist range seven may be delineated as a humorous baseball obsessed impatient salesperson World Health Organization dresses flashy, chews gum, and desires to dephase to attend a ball. He incessantly uses baseball metaphors and looks to lack heaps of human concern or compassion for the suspect and also the migrator panelist range three. The jury foreman, panelist number one, could be a highschool assistant head coach and is usually involved along with his role because the foreman and tries to stay the proceedings formal whereas maintaining his authority. This panelist is definitely pissed off and excessively sensitive. He lacks any natural leadership characteristics that area unit solely emphasised by the natural born leadership skills of panelist range eight.

When AN initial canvass is taken so as to work out the tendency of the jury, the results reveal that eleven of the12 jurors area unit in favor of a guilty finding with just one, panelist range eight, vote for final judgment. this first vote and also the influence that panelist range eight has on the cluster remains the main focus of the cluster for the complete picture show with a good deal of frustration and stormy periods occurring for the cluster as formality provides thanks to confrontation between members and individual roles begin to emerge. as an example, as panelist range three continues to press a private agenda that's heavily influenced by his own experiences along with his teen son, he resorts to call occupation and disrespectful nonverbal behavior toward the opposite jurors.

The ensuing split that begins to emerge within the cluster tends to divide members into either an efficient cohort or a cohort that's exclusively centered on rigid logic and communication skills. throughout this point, the toilet is employed metaphorically by members for house “outside of the cluster.” it's during this house that members conjointly begin to lobby for his or her own points of read. Moreover, the toilet conjointly is a short respite from the growing intensity of the cluster within the deliberation area.

Stage 4: acting phase

The jurors conceive to take a second vote leading to a nine guilty and three not guilt split of the cluster. This try at a second vote may be construed because the cluster going in what Tuckman (1965) remarked because the acting stage. At this stage within the cluster development model, there's clear proof that the cluster has become a lot of intently centered on the task at hand which the cluster members do a higher job of being attentive to one another. additionally, safety has become a significant concern for the cluster and this can be exemplified by the behavior of panelist range three losing all self-control. This rude and husky man seems to be a bully inside the cluster and is forceful and loud. chesty and fast tempered, panelist range three remains noncompliant till the terribly finish. it's at this stage of the method that a lot of purposeful cluster members like panelist range 11begins to elevate their level of phaseicipation inside the cluster. Originally reserved ANd thought of somewhat as being an outsider by the opposite yank White males of the jury, this German born migrator World Health Organization speaks with an important accent expresses reverence for yank democracy, its system of justice, and also the dependableness of the law.

Later, once verbal phaseicipation becomes a lot of distributed, another vote is taken and also the split becomes six guilty and six for final judgment. Tensions began to rise even higher and area unit solely quickly eased by the abrupt rain and also the air-con returning to life. Prejudices begin to surface and also the threat of physical violence is escalated. throughout this stage of the deliberation method, ultimately logic and persistence preserve over emotions and personal agendas. The cluster members use this chance to mirror on their own personalities as they react to the plain dynamic direction of the jury’s call. Eventually, some members withdraw whereas others still fight; although most easily align themselves with the continued method and direction of the bulk.

Stage 5: Adjournment phase

Once a unanimous finding has been reached, the court’s functionary another time functions as a bridge to the skin world from that they need been sequestered. throughout this adjournment phase, there area unit heaps of symbolic nurturing behaviors that indicate the cluster has reached the ultimate level. These symbolic behaviors area unit evident in little gestures like once one panelist assists another panelist with golf stroke on his coat or giving birth a comforting hand upon a shoulder. within the final scene, it's AN phaseicularly poignant moment once 2 members introduce themselves whereas awaiting AN elevator. The symbolism is made with the 2 having shared a robust expertise while not the need of the same old knowledge and trappings of the overall society.