Question

Describe and define the evolution of team leadership. Discuss why small teams can be more effective than large teams? Provide examples to clarify your point.

Answer 1

A Thumbs Up! Would be really helpful for me. If you have any questions, please leave a comment and I will get back to you as soon as possible.

The team leadership has evolved over the years in the workplace. In today's time, team leadership is quite different from earlier times. In today's world, technology is becoming an advanced need in all the organizations which has left all traditional hierarchy structures outdated in the success of businesses. Earlier leadership was to achieve outcomes through the control and command processes or approaches to accomplish the business strategy. In recent years, leadership has created a different definition and success level as it correlates to not only top management but also to all levels in the organization. Today all big companies, in their training sessions talk about the importance of leadership and how with the team leading the company can achieve its goals and also how employees can achieve their personal goals with professional growth. Now the team effectively collaborates with the measures and efficiency results. Earlier workplace used to be not challenging but now the workplace is changing and employees expect the workplace to be challenging and exciting with the team-based work environment. The leadership skills are now upgraded with different elements into it. Technology e has evolved the team leadership in a great manner over the years whether its communication, processes, or access to different pieces of information. The world is evolving rapidly in terms of team leadership.

The reasons why small teams can be more effective than the last teams are as follow:

-effective communication: there is no doubt that small teams lead to effective communication then the larger teams as there are fewer chances of miscommunication for change in expressions or ideas.

-more innovative and productive meetings: employees in small teams emphasize challenging each other, voice up their own opinions, work on teams' views, and deciding accordingly. For example, one can try having a small meeting with a group of 3 to 4 employees and focus on their participation level. Here, one can notice that all employees will be willing to share their views or opinions, have a good flow of communication, and more involved in the process and decision making.

-small teams are more flexible and more accountable: undoubtedly, when the team has fewer members it is easy to make changes and be flexible according to situations and being more accountable with each member's roles and responsibilities.