Consider the following passage:

The first and most manifest way is the argument from motion. It is certain and evident to our senses that some things are in motion. Whatever is in motion is moved by another.... For 'motion' means the reduction of something from a state of potentiality into a state of actuality. But a thing can be reduced from a state of potentiality into a state of actuality only by something already in a state of actuality.... It is impossible for the same thing should be simultaneously in a state of actuality and potentiality from the same point of view, but only from different points of view.... Therefore, whatever is in motion must be put in motion by another, and that by another again. This cannot go on to infinity, because then there would be no first mover, and, consequently, no other movers--since subsequent movers only move insofar as they are put in motion by the first mover.... Therefore it is necessary to arrive at a first mover, put in motion by no other; and this everyone understands to be God.

The following question has 2 parts:

Please formalize the argument presented in this passage.
Please present your one best criticism of the argument presented in the passage

Name three Constitutional issues that The Supreme Court has ruled on in the 21st century. Choose the issue that you think is most important and relevant to legal psychology.

Using Emile Durkheim’s understanding of social integration to discuss whether or not this sociological perspective can be applied to gang violence, teenage pregnancy, and/or drug addiction?

Think about how notions of social acceptability change. Identify what you would find shocking or unacceptable on stage. If you have not seen much theatre, imagine how you would feel seeing it live. Is there a difference between what you would accept on stage and on film/TV (for example, profanity, nudity, realistic violence, presentational violence)?

How do you feel about Free speech? Do you think hate speech should be protected under Free Speech?

Explain the role of the guardian ad litem, and identify one other key personnel in the juvenile court, and what function do they perform?

Discuss how the United States was perceived as a world power in the late nineteenth century and the changes that occurred concerning its foreign policy.

What are treatment interventions that would be considered culturally relevant to a participant of behavioral health services? Discuss one program from your research that presents culturally relevant methods, activities, and resources for participants, and provide an example of each component.

What skills and competencies are employers looking for in entry-level employees? Do you agree or disagree? Why is emotional intelligence being embraced by many employers? Do you have what the employers are looking for? If not, what is your plan to develop missing skills?

What were the motivations for American expansionism and how were they supported?

Hubel and Weisel (1963) recorded from individual neurons from visual cortex. They found that neurons in primary visual cortex

1. Desimone, et al (1984) presented macaque monkeys with stimuli that included bananas, black snakes, toilet brushes, and faces, and recorded from individual neurons from visual-temporal cortex. The results showed that

   		a. neurons responded to all of these stimuli in the same way.
   		b. neurons responded selectively to face stimuli.
   		c. neurons responded selectively to the snake stimuli.
   		d. neurons responded selectively to the faces and the toilet brush stimuli.

I keep talking about “neurons responding selectively” to things. What does it mean for a neuron to “respond selectively”?

Why has the clinical field been slow to investigate possible cultural and racial differences in sexual behaviors?

What are the main findings of Clemmer's research? In your opinion, based on what you have learned in your CJBS major classes, are these findings still relevant today?