summarize jamla lyiscott " 3 ways to speak english"

define and describe the main, basic issue of mind-body problem

Week 7 DQ 6 The Nature of the Fetus

Background:

According to Vaughn (297), a standard argument opposed to abortion goes as follows:

1. It is wrong to kill an innocent person.

2. The unborn (i.e., the fetus) is an innocent person from the moment of conception.

3. Therefore, it is wrong to kill the unborn (abortion is immoral).

The abortion issue is as divisive as any studied in bioethics. So, as we begin to examine this issue it is helpful to bear in mind common moral ground shared by those who take opposing positions on this issue. As Vaughn points out, “Both sides agree on some basic moral principles—for example, that murder is wrong, that persons have a right to life, and that personal freedom should not be curtailed except for very important reasons” (258). So, we might say that abortion opponents and proponents agree on the moral premise:

1. It is wrong to kill an innocent person.

The primary source of disagreement between the two sides has to do with the nonmoral premise (2):

2. The unborn (i.e., the fetus) is an innocent person

This premise has to do with the nature of the fetus. Is the fetus a human being, a person, a potential person, a living being, a mass of tissues or something else?

One’s view about this nonmoral fact will probably affect one’s conclusion about the moral permissibility of abortion. If the fetus is a person, then the anti-abortion argument is sound and it is wrong to kill a fetus. If the fetus is not a person, the argument above is unsound (i.e., it is valid but one of the premises is false). In this case, one might offer a different argument with a different moral premise that leads to the conclusion that abortion is wrong or one might conclude that abortion is morally permissible.

DQ 1 Instructions:

Based upon your readings for this week, answer the following questions for your response in this order:

What is a person? Drawing from and citing ideas from your readings, offer a reasoned account of what it means to be a person. In order to clarify your position give an example of something (besides a fetus if this is your view) that does not count as a person and explain why it is not a person.

What about persons makes it wrong to kill them? What characteristics, qualities, relationships, etc. makes it wrong to kill a person? Draw from your readings and, if possible, an ethical theory we have discussed as you answer these questions.

Is the fetus a person according to your view? (Depending on your definition of personhood, it may be necessary for you to distinguish between the fetus at an early stage of a pregnancy as opposed to a late stage.) If so, give an explanation why a fetus satisfies the definition you have offered. If not, explain what you think a fetus is and why, and then, explain whether a fetus has a right to not be killed.

Works Cited:

Vaughn, Lewis. Bioethics: Principles, Issues, and Cases. 2^nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.

As a new writer what are some challenges, as an individual will face? Will you have, some weakness and strong points to consider What about the structure of the body paragraphs, can it be restrictive? In terms of how a paragraph are constructed, do you consider academic or pubic resources?

Knowing what you know about the socialization process, discuss the positive and negative impact of television viewing on young children.

In film Vertigo (1958) and in the film The Big Short (2015), we meet characters who are recovering from some kind of trauma. Explain how these experiences affect the character and influence the direction of the narrative?

Father, Son and Gum; As other dynasties fade, a fourth-generation CEO shakes up Wrigley by tossing out his dad's rule book.

IN 1995, WILLIAM WRIGLEY JR. approached his father with a bold idea: The family-run company, after dominating the chewing-gum business for a century, should start selling mints. His father, who had successfully run Wm. Wrigley Jr. Co. for more than three decades, turned him down. "We know gum," the son recalls his father saying.

Family dynasties running big public companies over several generations are a vanishing breed. But William Wrigley Jr., who took over the business in 1999 after his father's unexpected death, has managed to turn around a company whose sales had stagnated and whose staff was steeped in doing things in the ultra-conservative manner of his father. At 35 years old, Mr. Wrigley set out to reinvent an iconic company while battling the legacy of his dad, a tough boss who had rejected many of his ideas over the years.

Since then, Mr. Wrigley has transformed the company from a cautious purveyor of Doublemint and Juicy Fruit into one of the fastest-growing publicly traded food companies. For the first time in decades, Wrigley is buying competitors, taking on debt and pouring money into research. After introducing few products in the 1990s, the company launched 72 last year alone, including cappuccino-flavored gum and sour gummy Life Savers. It purchased Altoids mints, is thinking about chocolate and patented chewing gum for dogs. "I don't rule anything out," says Mr. Wrigley.

While some of his ventures have flopped, Wrigley has performed well in the seven years since he took over. Sales have more than doubled, to $4.16 billion last year, profits have increased 68% overall and the company's stock has risen about 45%. Some analysts worry that the company's moves to diversify could shift its focus from the $15 billion world-wide gum market, where Wrigley is the top player.

Mr. Wrigley, now 42, has also hired outsiders for top positions, eased the dress code and encouraged employees to take risks -- things that didn't happen under his father. As long as his father was at the center of the company, "I was going to get stopped from getting any further into the center or we were going to collide like two neutrons or atoms in an accelerator," says Mr. Wrigley. "That is one of the biggest challenges for family businesses," he says. "When to step aside and how to step aside."

Ford Motor Co. and J.M. Smucker Co. are run by the great-grandsons of the founders, but many older family business dynasties are dying out as the third and fourth generations decide not to take over. Children don't feel as close to the founder as time passes, and increasingly independent boards are demanding broader sets of skills for leaders.

The Wrigley family helped build Chicago and remains one of its best- known dynasties. Wrigley's Michigan Avenue headquarters is one of the city's landmark buildings and the family's name is on everything from the Chicago Cubs baseball stadium to the Wrigleyville neighborhood to part of the new Millennium Park.

Yet growing up, Mr. Wrigley tried to conceal his identity, by introducing himself with just his first name. "Introducing yourself as Bill Wrigley was way more of a liability," he says. "Most people would think it's terrific. But people instantly look at you differently, judge you, and say, 'Oh here's this real wealthy person' or something, 'and he's going to be full of himself.' "

Although Mr. Wrigley shut down the company's 94-year-old gum plant on Chicago's south side last year, he simultaneously opened a $45 million research and development center in the city that's helped revitalize the Goose Island area and is bringing in white-collar jobs. Wrigley, which has had gum factories overseas since the 1920s, still makes gum at a facility in Yorkville, Ill.

Through trusts, Mr. Wrigley controls more shares of the company than any other investor, with about 15% under his beneficial ownership. The company won't say how many shares are held by the entire Wrigley clan. A divorced father of three, Mr. Wrigley is the only family member at Wrigley. His older sister and brother have never worked at the company. The family has been intensely private for decades, and Mr. Wrigley grants few interviews.

The first William Wrigley Jr. was 11 years old when, in 1872, he ran away from Philadelphia to New York, where he hawked newspapers and slept on the street, according to a 1920 article in American Magazine. Years later he went to Chicago to peddle soap, then baking powder, to shop owners. To entice them, he gave away two packages of chewing gum with each can of baking powder. When the gum became more popular, he started selling that instead. Soon he was making his own gum. Juicy Fruit hit shelves in 1893. To build sales, Mr. Wrigley twice gathered every phonebook in the country and mailed each person listed four sticks of chewing gum, according to the article, which the company cites. By 1920, he was making nine billion sticks of gum a year and had become the world's largest advertiser of a single product. In 1923, the company went public.

The Great Depression nudged the company in a more cautious direction under the founder's son, Philip Wrigley. (He was the company's only leader who wasn't named William.) When Philip's son, William Wrigley, took over as chief executive in 1961, he increased sales by pushing into Europe and Asia. But Wrigley stood by as Warner-Lambert Co. took the lead in sugarless gum with Trident in the 1960s.

The current William Wrigley Jr. grew up watching his father go to work at the company's white terra cotta headquarters in Chicago. When he was 5, his parents divorced. At 10, he moved to Arizona with his mother and siblings, where he swam competitively. He was a B student in private school. As a teen, he lived with his father during the summers and worked at the company, driving to the office with his father. On weekends, he water-skied with his dad at the Wrigley estate in Lake Geneva, Wis.

One summer, the younger Mr. Wrigley donned a white lab coat to mix test batches of Extra sugarless gum. At Duke University, where he studied economics, he read company memos mailed to him by his father. But he didn't go to work at Wrigley right away. He wanted to create something of his own. "I've always liked the idea of being an entrepreneur," Mr. Wrigley says. He'd grown up intrigued by the adventurous tales he heard about his great-grandfather, the company founder. "Those genes maybe skipped a couple generations and popped up again."

After graduating, he moved to Seattle to help a friend launch a three-person business selling stain remover. His father gave his reluctant blessing, Bill Jr. says. Bill Jr. set himself up in the frozen-foods aisle of supermarkets to demonstrate the stain remover on a carpet sample. Soon, working at Wrigley seemed more exciting. He returned to Chicago in 1985 as his father's assistant.

The elder Wrigley was a formal man whom nearly everyone, even friends, called "Mr. Wrigley." He was called that until he died, even though by the 1990s, many top executives were much more informal. Yet Mr. Wrigley warmed employees by remembering their birthdays and shaking hands with workers at factories, recalls Dushan Petrovich, Wrigley's chief administrative officer.

Fanatical about details, Mr. Wrigley once flew a Chicago designer to meet him at Wrigley's Prague office in order to match the shade of blue in the carpet there with the floors at headquarters. He insisted on screening casting tapes for the new Doublemint twins, to find actors with the right look. "He didn't get challenged a whole lot," Bill Jr. says. "It was sort of 'This is what Mr. Wrigley wants and so let's go find a character with a shorter haircut.' "

When the younger Mr. Wrigley took a top job at Wrigley's Canadian division in 1990, he set out to change the recipes and packaging for Juicy Fruit, Doublemint and Spearmint. Sales in Canada were falling and the formulas had hardly changed in decades. He also proposed launching a pellet-shaped sugarfree gum, which was selling well for Wrigley in Europe.

His father quickly nixed the packaging and recipe changes because he said they could alienate longtime customers, Bill Jr. recalls. The elder Wrigley balked at pellet gum, too, because it required costly new packaging equipment. Bill Jr. pressed, lobbying over lunch in his father's regular booth at the company's private restaurant. His father gave in. Excel pellets eventually became Wrigley's best- selling product in Canada. Bill Jr. doesn't recall his father congratulating him. "That just wasn't his style," he says.

In the mid-1990s, Altoids and other strong-tasting mints began gaining space in the candy aisle. Bill Jr. prodded his father to buy Frisk, a Belgian maker of zippy peppermints. Wrigley already had vast global merchandising and distribution. It could plug in the mints and increase sales, Bill Jr. figured. But his father thought "intense" mints were a fad. Besides, he told his son, there was still room to grow in gum. Italian competitor Perfetti Van Melle bought Frisk instead in 1995.

By the late 1990s, as the elder Mr. Wrigley reached his mid-60s, Bill Jr. began asking about his own future. The elder Mr. Wrigley didn't want to talk about succession. And he rarely commented on whether his son was doing a good job, Bill Jr. says. "I never felt that confidence from him." Frustrated, he began thinking about leaving Wrigley.

Howard Bernick, the departing Alberto-Culver Co. CEO who now sits on Wrigley's board, recalls the elder Mr. Wrigley thinking his son wasn't ready yet to take over and saying, " 'I just wish he was a little bit older.' "

Mr. Wrigley's father "had no doubt that he was going to be the next leader," says Richard Smucker, co-chief executive of jam maker J.M. Smucker and a Wrigley director. He just "leaned over backward a little bit not to express that" so people wouldn't think of his son as "the fair-haired boy." Mr. Smucker knows the issue of family business dynasties well, also being the great-grandson of a company founder. "Any family member has to work harder," he says.

The younger Mr. Wrigley was working in Europe in January 1999 when his father slipped on ice at the family estate in Wisconsin and broke his hip. Since his father was going through a divorce with his third wife at the time, Bill Jr. stepped in to take care of him, helping him run meetings from his home. What seemed a mild injury grew serious as his frail condition magnified other health problems. Nevertheless, the elder Wrigley insisted on running the annual shareholder meeting that March.

His condition took a turn for the worse. Bill Jr. sent the company jet to fetch his dad's doctor, who was away in Arizona. It was the first time anyone had dispatched the plane without his father's permission. "Don't worry," Bill Jr. told his father as he sat on his hospital bed. "I'm going to take care of everything." He says his father told him that he loved him.

By the next morning, the elder Mr. Wrigley had slipped into a coma. Terrified, Bill Jr. led the annual meeting for the first time. Days later, Wrigley's board named him acting president. He went to the hospital to tell his father, who was unresponsive in the coma. Mr. Wrigley died the next day, of complications from pneumonia. "Once he knew that I was going to run the company, I think he said, 'OK, now it's time for me to go,' " Bill Jr. says.

Ten days later, William Wrigley Jr. became the fourth chief executive of the company, following his father, grandfather and great- grandfather. Wall Street immediately questioned whether he had enough experience. Although the company had been largely successful during his father's tenure, when Bill Jr. took over, its U.S. gum sales had been flat for about five years.

Sorting through his father's office, Mr. Wrigley was shocked to find in his in-box a question on what color to make the carpet on the 12th floor. "I don't want to make this decision," Mr. Wrigley recalls thinking. "And I don't want anyone who reports to me to make this decision." He turned his father's office into a conference space.

He started making other changes. Some were little, like lifting the ban on using voice-mail during business hours and loosening the dress code from coats and ties to "business-appropriate" attire.

Other changes were bigger, like creating the company's first-ever strategic plan, and hiring top managers from Gillette Co. and Procter & Gamble Co., breaking a tradition of promoting from within. He also ordered the new packaging and recipes for Doublemint and other standards that his father had rejected.

Sitting in a church before a friend's wedding, Mr. Wrigley scrawled on a card: "Wrigley brands woven into the fabric of everyday life around the world." He says he intentionally left out "gum" so the statement would stay relevant as the company expanded into candy. Today, his scribbling has become the company's vision statement.

Mr. Wrigley says he isn't trying to change Wrigley's values -- or its emphasis on chewing gum, a retail standard in the checkout line. Gum accounts for 90% of Wrigley's sales. "We see great growth in chewing gum," Mr. Wrigley says. "But then it was also just logical to say 'Well, what else is up at the front end there? Who else are we competing with? And why can't we do some of that too?' "

When Mr. Wrigley took over, there was "an unleashing of a lot of energy," says Mr. Petrovich, who also worked for his father. But some employees bristled at the changes in style. Managers fumbled over the new dress code, some not exactly sure what kind of shoes were allowed. A company-described "breakthrough" training session, that emphasized stretching and drinking water, was dismissed by some employees as a new-age fad, executives say. In a meeting shortly after Mr. Wrigley took over, someone mentioned a new initiative he knew nothing about. The people "looked at me like I was on the moon," he recalls, "because in the past, anything that happened, the CEO knew about."

He sent workers an email that said, "If we never make mistakes, then we are most likely not being very innovative and not taking enough risks." He made his own mistakes. He thought gum could be a vehicle for medicine, so Wrigley invested more than $10 million to start a health-care division that launched Surpass, a chewing gum infused with antacid. Wrigley couldn't persuade stores to stock it at the checkout counter, and finally pulled it off the market in 2003.

What might have been his biggest gamble never materialized. In 2002, he says he got a message to call Richard Lenny, Hershey's CEO. Mr. Lenny said the trust that controls Hershey wanted to sell the candy maker. Would Wrigley consider a bid? Wrigley hadn't bought a company in half a century and didn't even carry debt on its balance sheet at the time. "Absolutely," Mr. Wrigley said.

Board members weren't so sure about a deal that huge. Mr. Bernick says he thought Mr. Wrigley should "hit singles" instead of swinging for homers. His father "wouldn't have done that deal," Mr. Smucker says. Mr. Wrigley eventually convinced the board, and Wrigley beat Nestle SA and Cadbury Schweppes PLC with its $12.5 billion bid. But the Hershey trust got cold feet amid community and political pressure and called off the sale at the last minute.

Getting so close to a big deal made Mr. Wrigley more determined to move into candy. He told workers to internally start calling the company the Wrigley Confectionery Co. In 2004, Wrigley expanded into lollipops and chewy candy by buying assets from the Joyco arm of Agrolimen, a Spanish food conglomerate. Later that year, Wrigley paid $1.48 billion for Altoids, Life Savers and other candy brands from Kraft Foods.

Wrigley is looking at more acquisitions and, at its new research center, scientists are searching for the next big candy. New products now account for 17% of sales, up from less than 6% during the late 1990s. Executives won't be specific about what is in the works, but "chocolate is within our playing field," says Surinder Kumar, Wrigley's chief innovation officer.

Some analysts say Wrigley may have overpaid for Kraft's brands and that weak sales of Altoids aren't a good sign. Mr. Wrigley says sales are within expectations. And some of Wrigley's new products haven't panned out. In addition to closing its health-care division, the company has pulled back on breath-freshening strips amid strong competition from Pfizer Inc.'s Listerine brand.

In his office, Mr. Wrigley keeps a picture of his father huddled with his dogs. In some ways, he says, it was better that his father wasn't there when he took over the company. "Maybe the silver lining in the whole thing is that maybe he realized it would have been difficult to coexist with different styles in the business," Mr. Wrigley says. His father's passing "was a graceful exit, although, to put it mildly, hugely unfortunate to lose your father at 66," he says.

He wishes his father were alive to see how he's made Wrigley grow. "My only regret is that I don't have my father side by side, or even off relaxing or retiring on some island, to be able to share it with."

While Mr. Wrigley says he never felt overt pressure from his dad to take over the business, "you kind of know there's a legacy there. You know your family's been in this business since 1891, and there's been a sequence of generations running the company." Mr. Wrigley says he "tried to push that into the background and leave options open to me in terms of what I might be interested in doing . . . .And at the end of the day, the reason I did come back to the business is because it was just darn interesting."

He isn't insisting that his children follow his career path. "You get so much influence from your parents," he says. "The important thing is for us to kind of get out of the way and make sure that we don't try and force them into doing something we wanted to do."

Questions:

1) What changes did he make after assuming leadership?

2) What were the challenges he faced as the new leader?

express the importance of public servants and community service. It can draw from both personal experience and the impact on the community as a whole.

In approximately 500 words, describe an example of your leadership.

A maladaptive patterns of substance use leading to dysfunction or distress. There will be more than one right answer.

Was required for a Substance Use Disorder in DSM-IV but is no longer required by DSM-5

Has to also include either withdrawal tolerance to be considered a Substance Use Disorder

Can involve almost any drug

Is the DSM-5 definition of a Substance Use Disorder

short answer :

List two of the six traits that Max Weber used to describe bureaucratic social organizations and give an explanation of your two choices.

What is the "McDonaldization" of society? List two of the four principles that define this organizational pattern and briefly describe them.

What does it mean to say that rationality may be irrational? How might Weber respond to this question?

What is The Chinese Room thought experiment?

Discuss the positives changes that occurred following the abolition of Slavery and during

the early stages of Reconstruction. Speak specifically to political and economic advances.

What are 2 distinct styles of early language learning? What accounts for toddler's language style?

How is violence against the LGB community tied to the construction of gender? must be 300 words