How does or does not milgram study reflect ethics in research? How was it or was it not ethical at that time? Give clear examples from the text and research. Do you feel that a study like this should have been allowed? Why/why not

Today, more than ever, parents are encouraged to talk to their teens about drugs. During this talk with your child, you want to present several facts. What facts about smoking, alcohol use, and marijuana use do you present to your child? Remembering that "...most adolescents think they are exceptions," and learning of generational forgetting, what approach do you use to discourage your child from using these substances?

How does America compare to other industrialized nations when it comes to gender equality? Provide examples of social policies that are intended to promote an environment of gender equality in the workplace, home, and social world in the United States or elsewhere.  Be sure to reference all sources

What stands out to when creating excellent communication and why does clear, concise, and complete communication help to facilitate learning and advance conversations in the forum?

1. Briefly discuss dreams and REM vs. NREM sleep.

According to natural law theory, actions are right just because they are natural and wrong just because they are unnatural. The theory has a number of attractions. By grounding morality in human nature, the theory promises to explain both how morality could be objective and why morality applies only to human beings. The theory could also help us to understand the origins of morality and how we can come to have moral knowledge. If, through science, we come to understand our nature and its origin, then according to natural law theory, we will know everything we need to know about morality. If natural law theory is to be plausible, its defenders must specify exactly what sense of “human nature” is supposed to be morally relevant. On one understanding, human nature consists of whatever is innately human. Others take human nature to be whatever all or most humans have in common. Still others understand human nature to consist of whatever we were “designed” by nature to do. The problem for natural law theory is that none of these understandings of human nature seems to provide a sufficient basis for morality. Whether an action or character trait is morally good does not seem to depend on whether it is innate or acquired. The percentage of people who have a given trait does not seem particularly morally relevant, either—even if almost everyone were cruel, this would still not make cruelty morally admirable. Furthermore, on either of the two most common ways of understanding natural purposes, whether an action enables us to fulfill a natural purpose doesn’t seem to tell us whether that act is morally permissible or not. The term human nature can be understood in many ways. Even if we settle on one definition of human nature, however, it is far from obvious that everything natural is morally good, or vice versa. Given that natural laws merely tell us how things will behave whereas the function of moral laws is to tell us how we should behave, it should come as no surprise that nature does not tell us everything we’d like to know about morality.

"Suppose that 'human nature' consists of the set of innate characteristics that all (or most) humans share. Understood in this way, what does human nature tell us about morality? Is it always immoral to behave contrary to human nature?" Write 200 words.

6-10 sentences and please include any references if used.

What would Travis Hirschi say about using incarceration as a form of punishment? Based on his control theory, would he be for or against incarceration? Support your position.

Discuss why participants milgram study obeyed the researcher. What concepts or theories would explain this? Discuss what you feel are the best psychological explanations for why "we/anyone” conform/obey in the real world.

In contrast to what we were taught about the use of technology and early childhood, your teen seems to find encouragement to use technology from all sides. What are the pros/advantages and cons/risks of allowing your teen access to technology and the internet? How will you monitor or limit your teen's use

Explain why philosophy of science postulates that a model “is a simplified representation of a theory”

Besides the influences of cartoon and movie characters, how might observational learning impact what a child chooses to eat?

On the subject of the eating habits of teenagers and adults? Can you think of a food product or products that these age groups might be influenced to try or like as the result of influential figures (i.e. celebrities or professional athletes, etc.)

List at least three concerns/consequences for an adult who was sexually abused as a child.