Questions:

1.After viewing the film, “Obedience” by Stanley Milgram, which two experimental conditions (different variables changed such as proximity of authority figure, closeness of victim, etc.) of the experiment did you have a strong personal reaction to?

List and describe the two experimental conditions of the experiment AND your personal reactions.
Be specific in your answer by describing the experimental condition portrayed in the film and your personal reaction (such as fear, surprise, anger, shock, wonder, etc.)
A.First experimental condition and personal reaction (10 points):
B.Second experimental condition and personal reaction (10 points):

2.Describe an event when an authority figure was able to convince you (or someone you know or heard of) to do something you (they) did not want to do, either intentionally or unintentionally?
NOTE: This event can range from being a simple thing like obeying a teacher in school or a parent at home to a more complex event like obeying an authority figure in order to protect someone else or yourself. Or it could be something in-between.

If so, then why did you (they) personally compromise your (their) own beliefs in order to submit to the will of said authority figure?

Discuss how Milgram’s research and theory explains your event.

3. What historical and/or current events mirror Milgram’s findings on obedience?
What links do you see between one historical and/or current event?
What similarities to the findings do you see?
Describe in detail the similarities you have found between the two.
Discuss how this event relates to Milgram’s research and theory

Suppose gene therapy can extend a person’s life to over 150 years; would this be a good thing? Please explain why or why not.

Sectionalism. in at least 400 words.

NOTE: HISTORY 011: Pol&Soc Hist  

: in no less than 300 words, evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of your writing/reading skills, your ability to make an argument, and your ethical values. I also want you to think about what excites you about ethics, and what you wish you did better when it comes to academic work. Take some time to make honest goals for your improvement this semester, and for the course in general. Please discuss some, but not necessarily all, of the following: 1) How did you come to have the values you have? Where did you learn them? How strongly do you hold these ideas? 2) What is one value you hope will not change over your lifetime? Why? 3) How do you expect to change in this course? 4) What have you been told about your ability to make an argument in writing? 5) What activities did you find effective for improving your writing or reading skills? Why? 6) What kind of reading/writing do you enjoy and do well? Why do you think you are successful? 7) What kind of reading/writing do you dislike? Why do you think you are unsuccessful? 8) How might the material covered in this class help your educational or career goals? 9) Set some personal goals and objectives for improving your philosophical skills this semester. Be as specific as possible.

in 6 or more sentences answer this question. How do sociologist explain why there is poverty in the U.S.?

in 6 or more sentences answer the following question.   What do Functional, Conflict, and Symbolic Interactionion theorist say about organizations?

In 6 or more sentences answer the following question. Durkheim's study of suicide: explain the three types and discuss where school shooters fit into his analysis?​

: After reading the assigned text, sit at the steps of your building/house for 20 minutes and observe what you see. Practice writing ethnographic field notes in your field notebook. What have you observed? Did you notice anything you have never noticed before? Response: Write a 250 - 400 word response in the discussion board. Summarize key points in the reading. Share your experiences of sitting on your steps.

At what point does an antisocial act become a crime? Should people be allowed to sue others for making unflattering, but true, statements about him or her? Why? Why not?

On the first page of the Sulkin reading, explain what the legitimacy of democracies depends upon. From that same page, explain how the election process should work in legitimizing democracies.

https://brightspace.mclennan.edu/content/enforced/14536-GOVT_2305_07_2018FA/Sulkin,%20Promises%20Made%20and%20Promises%20Kept.pdf?_&d2lSessionVal=kDmKGAPRczjarpWJECFMAhlox

Choose one of the developmental biological, psychoanalytical, cognitive, or social learning theories, and describe how it might influence the planning and delivery of lesson instruction.

Government Question

Explain the viewpoint that Edelman and Glastris have concerning the “vote at home” option and how it improves voter turnout. What information do they provide to support their belief that,” Vote at home clearly seems to have pushed young people and infrequent voters into the electorate…”?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/letting-people-vote-at-home-increases-voter-turnout-heres-proof/2018/01/26/d637b9d2-017a-11e8-bb03-722769454f82_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.05474fdc1e63

One page APA paper

Please answer the following questions

Does AA work because it's a form of CBT? Most people think of AA as a spiritual process with its main emphasis....