Can Artificial Intelligence therapy robots reduce ADHD symptoms?

We have all heard about MIT professor Dr. Rosalind Picard's pioneering work on artificial intelligence and autistic kids, but no one has applied her research to kids with ADHD. Can AI robots play the role of therapy dogs and reduce the symptoms of ADHD? Or is this project a waste of time and that is why no one has looked into this so far?

Please cite your sources and give credit to people if you use articles from the New York Times or from a science journal, etc.

Discuss the limitations / critiques against S-D logic and their relevance in today’s markets. Do you think S-D logic can be universally applied to today’s markets? Why or Why not?

IN YOUR OWN TERMS:

Based on the principles laid out Try to briefly describe a social issue, like public transportation or immigration, discrimination in the workplace or the cost of college, in a way that takes into consideration both the order and conflict views.

In a chemical reaction, exactly 2 mol of substance A react to produce exactly 3 mol of substance B.

2A->3B

How many molecules of substance B are produced when 29.7g of substance A reacts? The molar mass of substance A is 28.8 g/mol.

Step 1: Convert the mass of A to moles.

Step 2: Convert the number of moles of A to the number of moles of B.

Step 3: Convert the number of moles of B to molecules of B.

Gasoline stations located in close geographic proximity (e.g., across the street from one another) often charge different prices for the same octane gasoline. Does this reality undermine the logic of competition, the market process, and the law of one price? If your answer is “yes”, explain why using economic reasoning. If your answer is “no”, provide three economic reasons why we might observe such price differentials.

Q14. A student carries a reaction that becomes more and more acidic as it proceeds due to the formation of H3O+. The latter is detrimental to her reaction as it lowers the pH. She, therefore, chooses to run the reaction in a solution that will prevent this. Which of the following should she pick?

A. A mixture of 0.5 M NaOH and 0.5 M HCl

B. A mixture of 0.5 M HCl and 0.5 M NaCl

C. A mixture of 0.5 M H2CO3 and 0.5 M NH4Cl

D. A mixture of 0.5 M H2CO3 and 0.5 M NaHCO3

E. None of the above

The correct answer is D, I just want to know the reason why. Thumb up guaranteed if the explanation is adequate.

When clients have a history of criminal activity, in many circumstances counselors and therapists are bound to keep that history confidential. A client who reveals to a licensed psychologist that she robbed a liquor store last week, for example, probably has a right to have that information kept confidential unless she injured a child or elder or otherwise acted in ways that come under the mandated reporting laws. How do you feel about keeping such information confidential?

How would you explain the relationship between one's culture and one's identity? What does it mean/look like to have a “Christian” identity?

In this question, you are going to implement a human vs. human version of Notakto.

Notakto is a tic-tac-toe variant. It is played across three 3 x 3 boards: Board A, board B and board C. When you start the game you should output the boards as follows.

A B C
0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2
3 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 5
6 7 8 6 7 8 6 7 8
Player 1:
There are two players: Player 1 and player 2. Player 1 always starts. Both players play the same piece: X. E.g., let player 1 choose location 6 on board A, i.e., the user will enter A6. The output of the program should be as follows (bold font represents user input).

A B C
0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2
3 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 5
6 7 8 6 7 8 6 7 8
Player 1: A6
A B C
0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2
3 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 5
X 7 8 6 7 8 6 7 8
Player 2:
Each player takes turn placing an X on the board in a vacant space (a space not already occupied by an X).

A B C
0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2
3 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 5
6 7 8 6 7 8 6 7 8
Player 1: A6
A B C
0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2
3 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 5
X 7 8 6 7 8 6 7 8
Player 2: A7
A B C
0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2
3 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 5
X X 8 6 7 8 6 7 8
Player 1:
If a board has three X in a row, column, or diagonal, the board is dead and it cannot be played anymore. It should not be displayed anymore. E.g., in the following, board A becomes dead and is not displayed anymore.

A B C
0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2
3 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 5
6 7 8 6 7 8 6 7 8
Player 1: A6
A B C
0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2
3 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 5
X 7 8 6 7 8 6 7 8
Player 2: A7
A B C
0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2
3 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 5
X X 8 6 7 8 6 7 8
Player 1: A8
B C
0 1 2 0 1 2
3 4 5 3 4 5
6 7 8 6 7 8
Player 2:
The game ends when all the boards contain three X in a row, column, or diagonal, at which point the player to have made the last move loses the game. Unlike tic-tac-toe, there will always be a player who wins any game of Notakto.

A B C
0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2
3 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 5
6 7 8 6 7 8 6 7 8
Player 1: A6
A B C
0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2
3 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 5
X 7 8 6 7 8 6 7 8
Player 2: A7
A B C
0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2
3 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 5
X X 8 6 7 8 6 7 8
Player 1: A8
B C
0 1 2 0 1 2
3 4 5 3 4 5
6 7 8 6 7 8
Player 2: B0
B C
X 1 2 0 1 2
3 4 5 3 4 5
6 7 8 6 7 8
Player 1: B4
B C
X 1 2 0 1 2
3 X 5 3 4 5
6 7 8 6 7 8
Player 2: C0
B C
X 1 2 X 1 2
3 X 5 3 4 5
6 7 8 6 7 8
Player 1: C4
B C
X 1 2 X 1 2
3 X 5 3 X 5
6 7 8 6 7 8
Player 2: C8
B
X 1 2
3 X 5
6 7 8
Player 1: B8
Player 2 wins game
Note that you should check for legal moves. If the users enters something illegal you should prompt them again. Let's play a new game to illustrate this.

A B C
0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2
3 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 5
6 7 8 6 7 8 6 7 8
Player 1: C0
A B C
0 1 2 0 1 2 X 1 2
3 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 5
6 7 8 6 7 8 6 7 8
Player 2: B9
Invalid move, please input again
Player 2: fds
Invalid move, please input again
Player 2: C0
Invalid move, please input again
Player 2: C6
A B C
0 1 2 0 1 2 X 1 2
3 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 5
6 7 8 6 7 8 X 7 8
Player 1: C6
Invalid move, please input again
Player 1: C3
A B
0 1 2 0 1 2
3 4 5 3 4 5
6 7 8 6 7 8
Player 2: C2
Invalid move, please input again
Player 2:
Implement the game and try to pass all test cases. The list of test cases is not complete. We may add more test cases when marking after the deadline.

Yo

I want the answer in python

A possible break in the Keynesian transmission mechanism

In Brown-Peterson Task lab, Do you or anyone you know like to study with the television or the radio on? Now that you have done this experiment, what do you think about this practice? Explain Discussion Question 1. Other than the explanation given in the question, what else could have explained the data?

What experience have you had with the legal system? Do not wish to infringe on anyone’s privacy. Did you hire a lawyer? What would your recommendations to others be, based on your experience?

During in class we did a simulation of the effect of natural selection in a population. After eliminating the individuals that died of, because of predation or disease, we calculated the frequencies of p and q. Then the number of individuals was restored to the initial population number of 50. Why was this crucial in our simulation?

• Describe the selection process and stressors of police officers

Please Use your keyboard (Don't use handwriting)

ECOM201

I need new and unique answers, please. (Use your own words, don't copy and paste)

Virtual Team Successes and Stresses

A Case Study

8/8/2016

As widespread as diverse and dispersed teaming is these days, leading a virtual team can be a challenge. This case study offers ideas on making the best of diverse and dispersed team structures.

Virtual teaming, that is, working on teams whose members are not present in the same location, is a fact of our modern, globalized business world. Virtual (or diverse and dispersed) teams are prevalent not only in multinational companies with offices in different countries, but also in academic and non-governmental institutions with bases across the world. In such team structures, members often have to communicate and collaborate with others who could be thousands of miles and many time zones apart.

As widespread as diverse and dispersed teaming is these days, leading a virtual team can be a challenge. Team leaders need to not only account for practical matters such as scheduling across time zones, but also technical issues such as varying rates of connectivity and access to communication platforms. However, one of the biggest factors in creating successful collaboration among diverse and dispersed teams is culture – specifically, tailoring the team’s mission, plans and procedures to the preferences of the different cultures represented on the team.

The following is a case study provided by a Cultural Navigator subject matter expert in diverse and dispersed teaming:

“A virtual team leader named Rebecca, originally from the United States, recently led a virtual project team with members from Japan, Mexico, Germany, Korea and the US. Rebecca was focused on setting the team up for success, and although she deliberately used strategies and tools made available by her company, she learned some valuable lessons along the way.

“Before initiating the project with a kick-off meeting, Rebecca made sure that everyone filled out their Cultural Orientations Indicator (COI) assessment to get to know their own work-style preferences. She then invited all members into a team message board on the Cultural Navigator, and encouraged them to share their profiles to better understand each other’s work-style preferences.

“The team was not able to have a face-to-face kick-off meeting, so during their first virtual meeting, every team member took time to introduce him or herself. The members talked about the different preferences in their team using the non-judgmental vocabulary of the Cultural Orientations Approach. At the end of the call, the team agreed on some ground rules for their upcoming teleconference and then closed the call.

“As the project continued, the team leader noticed that key team members were regularly not sharing their sales pipelines during their calls as agreed upon. Rebecca used humor during their sessions to lighten the mood, thinking some of the team members were nervous. However, she noticed the same people began to skip the calls, and were reluctant to speak when they were in attendance.”

In the above case study, the team leader Rebecca had done her due diligence in preparing the team to accommodate different cultural preferences among its members. But then she hit a snag. What had she done wrong?

The subject matter expert offered this reading of the situation: “In retrospect, Rebecca realized that even though she had set ground rules, she could have had an individual talk with each member before finalizing the team structure and processes. Perhaps in those discussions she would have understood that Woo-jin, her Korean colleague, worked in a strict hierarchical office environment and had to clear most decisions with his direct supervisor before sending anything to her. Woo-jin had hoped his team leader realized he did not have this approval, however Rebecca was not aware of this.

Similarly, the Japanese team member named Kamiko was concerned about the strict data protection laws in Japan, so she did not feel comfortable sharing her sales pipeline information. Kamiko had tried to indirectly convey this limitation to Rebecca, who wasn’t able to understand this message.

As for Rebecca’s use of humor during teleconferences, she did not realize how many cultural references she was using in her jokes, which her colleagues from outside her own culture had little understanding of.”

In essence, while Rebecca began the team’s collaboration with most of the components necessary for success, throughout the project duration, she learned the hard way that cultural mishaps often stall even the best plan.

While cultural due diligence and careful preparation are necessary components of working with a virtual team, the team leader and members need to exercise cultural awareness and cultural competence all along the way.

Though there can be challenges to working in diverse and dispersed teams, they are a fact of modern work life. The good news is that, when managed well, virtual teams can be as effective and productive as their traditional equivalents.

Questions:

1. What did the team leader notice during the team meeting (calls) and what did she tried to do to enhance the situation?
2. What should Rebeca had to do for each virtual worker and why?
3. What were the special situations with the Korean and the Japanese workers?
4. What the virtual leaders and the virtual members need to exercise?
5. How can the virtual teams be as effective and productive as their traditional equivalents?