Question

Training professionals continue to debate whether the ISD model is flawed. Do you believe that ISD is a useful process? Why or why not? Are there certain situations when it is a more (or less) effective way to design training?

Answer 1

• The training design process is useful because it gives a systematic approach to training. Designing training unsystematically will reduce the benefits that can be achieved. For example, choosing a training method before determining training needs or ensuring employees’ readiness for training increases the risk that the method chosen will not be the most effective one for meeting training needs. Also, training may not even be necessary and may result in a waste of time and money. Employees may have the knowledge, skills, and behavior they need but simply not be motivated to use them.
• Regardless of the specific ISD approach used, the following assumptions should be considered:-
• Training design is effective only if it helps employees reach instructional or training goals and objectives.
• Measurable learning objectives should be identified before the training program begins
• Evaluation plays an important part in planning and choosing a training method, monitoring the training program, and suggesting changes to the training design process.