Question

In: Accounting

FIFO Method, Two-Department Analysis Muskoge Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product that...

FIFO Method, Two-Department Analysis

Muskoge Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product that is processed in two departments: Molding and Assembly. In the Molding Department, direct materials are added at the beginning of the process; in the Assembly Department, additional direct materials are added at the end of the process. In both departments, conversion costs are incurred uniformly throughout the process. As work is completed, it is transferred out. The following table summarizes the production activity and costs for February:

Molding Assembly
Beginning inventories:
  Physical units 10,000   8,000  
  Costs:
    Transferred in —   $45,200  
    Direct materials $22,000   —  
    Conversion costs $13,800   $16,800  
Current production:
  Units started 25,000   ?  
  Units transferred out 30,000   35,000  
  Costs:
    Transferred in —   ?  
    Direct materials $56,250   $39,550  
    Conversion costs $103,500   $136,500  
  Percentage of completion:
    Beginning inventory 40% 50%
    Ending inventory 80  

50  

Compute the following. For interim computations, carry amounts out to four decimal places. Round your final answers to the nearest dollar.

Cost of ending work in process: $__
Cost of goods transferred out: __

A cost reconciliation. When necessary, round equivalent cost per unit to four decimal places, and round all other amounts to the nearest dollar.

Costs to account for:
Beginning work in process $__
Costs incurred __
Total costs to account for $__
Costs accounted for:
Transferred out $__
Ending work in process __
Total costs accounted for $__

Note: Cost reconciliation totals differ by $1 due to rounding error.

Prepare journal entries that show the flow of manufacturing costs for the Assembly Department. (a) Materials are added at the end of the process, (b) conversion costs are recorded, and (c) the units are transferred to Finished Goods.

(a) Work in Process-Assembly
Materials Inventory
(b) Work in Process-Assembly
Conversion Costs-Control
(c) Finished Goods
Work in Process-Assembly

Solutions

Expert Solution

Total costs accounted for:

Cost of units started and completed................................................(27,000 × $11.0133)$297,359*

Cost of units in beginning work in process:..................................................

Prior-period costs62,000..................................

Current cost to finish units:.......................

Direct materials (8,000 × $1.13)9,040....................

Conversion costs (4,000 × $4.20)16,800

Total costs of goods transferred out...................$385,199

Costs in ending work in process:Conversion (1,500 × $4.20)..............................$6,300

Transferred in (3,000 × $5.6833)......................17,050*

Total costs in ending work in process.................23,350

Total costs accounted for.....................................$408,549

*Rounded.

Costs to account for:Beginning work in process...................................$62,000

Costs incurred........

Journal entries:

Work in Process—Assembly..........39,550

Materials Inventory.....................39,550

Conversion Costs—Control......136,500*

Finished Goods................................385,287

Work in Process—Assembly....385,287

*Conversion costs are not broken into direct labor and overheadcomponents


Related Solutions

FIFO Method, Two-Department Analysis Muskoge Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product that...
FIFO Method, Two-Department Analysis Muskoge Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product that is processed in two departments: Molding and Assembly. In the Molding Department, direct materials are added at the beginning of the process; in the Assembly Department, additional direct materials are added at the end of the process. In both departments, conversion costs are incurred uniformly throughout the process. As work is completed, it is transferred out. The following table summarizes the production activity and...
Muskoge Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product that is processed in two...
Muskoge Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product that is processed in two departments: Molding and Assembly. In the Molding Department, direct materials are added at the beginning of the process; in the Assembly Department, additional direct materials are added at the end of the processes. In both departments, conversion costs are incurred uniformly throughout the process. As work is completed, it is transferred out. The following table summarizes the production activity and costs for February: Molding...
Muskoge Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product that is processed in two...
Muskoge Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product that is processed in two departments: Molding and Assembly. In the Molding Department, direct materials are added at the beginning of the process; in the Assembly Department, additional direct materials are added at the end of the process. In both departments, conversion costs are incurred uniformly throughout the process. As work is completed, it is transferred out. The following table summarizes the production activity and costs for February: Beginning...
Muskoge Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product that is processed in two...
Muskoge Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product that is processed in two departments: Molding and Assembly. In the Molding Department, direct materials are added at the beginning of the process; in the Assembly Department, additional direct materials are added at the end of the process. In both departments, conversion costs are incurred uniformly throughout the process. As work is completed, it is transferred out. The following table summarizes the production activity and costs for February: Beginning...
Weighted Average Method, Journal Entries Muskoge Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product...
Weighted Average Method, Journal Entries Muskoge Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product that is processed in two departments: Molding and Assembly. In the Molding Department, direct materials are added at the beginning of the process; in the Assembly Department, additional direct materials are added at the end of the process. In both departments, conversion costs are incurred uniformly throughout the process. As work is completed, it is transferred out. The following table summarizes the production activity...
FIFO Method, Two-Department Analysis Healthway uses a process-costing system to compute the unit costs of the...
FIFO Method, Two-Department Analysis Healthway uses a process-costing system to compute the unit costs of the minerals that it produces. It has three departments: Mixing, Tableting, and Bottling. In Mixing, at the beginning of the process all materials are added and the ingredients for the minerals are measured, sifted, and blended together. The mix is transferred out in gallon containers. The Tableting Department takes the powdered mix and places it in capsules. One gallon of powdered mix converts to 1,600...
FIFO Method, Two-Department Analysis Healthway uses a process-costing system to compute the unit costs of the...
FIFO Method, Two-Department Analysis Healthway uses a process-costing system to compute the unit costs of the minerals that it produces. It has three departments: Mixing, Tableting, and Bottling. In Mixing, at the beginning of the process all materials are added and the ingredients for the minerals are measured, sifted, and blended together. The mix is transferred out in gallon containers. The Tableting Department takes the powdered mix and places it in capsules. One gallon of powdered mix converts to 1,600...
Pureform, Inc., uses the FIFO method in its process costing system. It manufactures a product that...
Pureform, Inc., uses the FIFO method in its process costing system. It manufactures a product that passes through two departments. Data for a recent month for the first department follow: Units Materials Labor Overhead Work in process inventory, beginning 68,000 $ 68,700 $ 22,800 $ 32,900 Units started in process 649,000 Units transferred out 670,000 Work in process inventory, ending 47,000 Cost added during the month $ 804,750 $ 239,590 $ 409,825 The beginning work in process inventory was 80%...
Pureform, Inc., uses the FIFO method in its process costing system. It manufactures a product that...
Pureform, Inc., uses the FIFO method in its process costing system. It manufactures a product that passes through two departments. Data for a recent month for the first department follow: Units Materials Labor Overhead Work in process inventory, beginning 79,000 $ 75,100 $ 36,400 $ 49,100 Units started in process 751,000 Units transferred out 800,000 Work in process inventory, ending 30,000 Cost added during the month $ 1,557,385 $ 612,440 $ 688,995 The beginning work in process inventory was 70%...
Pureform, Inc., uses the FIFO method in its process costing system. It manufactures a product that...
Pureform, Inc., uses the FIFO method in its process costing system. It manufactures a product that passes through two departments. Data for a recent month for the first department follow: Units Materials Labor Overhead Work in process inventory, beginning 5,000 $ 4,320 $ 1,040 $ 1,790 Units started in process 45,000 Units transferred out 42,000 Work in process inventory, ending 8,000 Cost added during the month $ 52,800 $ 21,500 $ 32,250 The beginning work in process inventory was 80%...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT