Question

In: Accounting

FIFO Method, Two-Department Analysis Muskoge Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product that...

FIFO Method, Two-Department Analysis

Muskoge Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product that is processed in two departments: Molding and Assembly. In the Molding Department, direct materials are added at the beginning of the process; in the Assembly Department, additional direct materials are added at the end of the process. In both departments, conversion costs are incurred uniformly throughout the process. As work is completed, it is transferred out. The following table summarizes the production activity and costs for February:

Molding Assembly
Beginning inventories:
  Physical units 10,000   8,000  
  Costs:
    Transferred in —   $45,300  
    Direct materials $22,000   —  
    Conversion costs $13,800   $16,900  
Current production:
  Units started 25,000   ?  
  Units transferred out 30,000   35,000  
  Costs:
    Transferred in —   ?  
    Direct materials $56,750   $40,250  
    Conversion costs $106,500   $143,000  
  Percentage of completion:
    Beginning inventory 40% 50%
    Ending inventory 80   50  

Required:

1. Using the FIFO method, prepare the following for the Molding Department:

a. A physical flow schedule

Muskoge Company
Molding Department
Physical Flow Schedule
Units to account for:
Units, beginning work in process
Units started in February (transferred in)
Total units to account for
Units accounted for:
Units completed and transferred out:
Started and completed
From beginning work in process
Units, ending work in process
Total units accounted for

Feedback

b. An equivalent units calculation

Total Equivalent Units
Direct Materials
Conversion Costs

c. Calculation of unit costs. Round your answer to the nearest cent.
$ per unit

d. Cost of ending work in process and cost of goods transferred out.

Cost of ending work in process: $
Cost of goods transferred out: $

e. A cost reconciliation.

Costs to account for:
Beginning work in process $
Costs incurred
Total costs to account for $
Costs accounted for:
Transferred out $
Ending work in process
Total costs accounted for $

Feedback

2. Prepare journal entries that show the flow of manufacturing costs for the Molding Department. (a) Materials are added at the beginning of the process, (b) conversion costs are recorded, and (c) units are transferred to the Assembly Department.

(a) Work in Process-Molding
Materials Inventory
(b) Work in Process-Molding
Conversion Costs-Control
(c) Work in Process-Assembly
Work in Process-Molding

Feedback

3. Repeat Requirements 1 and 2 for the Assembly Department.

a. A physical flow schedule

Muskoge Company
Assembly Department
Physical Flow Schedule
Units to account for:
Units, beginning work in process
Units started in February (transferred in)
Total units to account for
Units accounted for:
Units completed and transferred out:
Started and completed
From beginning work in process
Units, ending work in process
Total units accounted for

Feedback

b. An equivalent units calculation

Total Equivalent Units
Direct Materials
Conversion Costs
Transferred In

c. Calculation of unit costs. If required, round your intermediate computations and final answer to four decimal places and use the rounded answer in subsequent computations.
$ per unit

d. Compute the following. For interim computations, carry amounts out to four decimal places. Round your final answers to the nearest dollar.

Cost of ending work in process: $
Cost of goods transferred out: $

e. A cost reconciliation. When necessary, round equivalent cost per unit to four decimal places, and round all other amounts to the nearest dollar.

Costs to account for:
Beginning work in process $
Costs incurred
Total costs to account for $
Costs accounted for:
Transferred out $
Ending work in process
Total costs accounted for $

Note: Cost reconciliation totals differ by $1 due to rounding error.

Feedback

Prepare journal entries that show the flow of manufacturing costs for the Assembly Department. (a) Materials are added at the end of the process, (b) conversion costs are recorded, and (c) the units are transferred to Finished Goods.

(a) Work in Process-Assembly
Materials Inventory
(b) Work in Process-Assembly
Conversion Costs-Control
(c) Finished Goods
Work in Process-Assembly

Correct

Solutions

Expert Solution

a. A physical flow schedule:
Muskoge Company
Molding Department
Physical Flow Schedule
Units to account for:
Units in beginning work in process 10,000
Units transferred in February (transferred in) 25,000
Total units to account for 35,000
Units accounted for:
Units completed and transferred out
Started and completed 20,000
From beginning work in process 10,000
Units, ending work in process 5,000
Total units accounted for 35,000

b. An equivalent units calculation

Total Equivalent Units
Direct Materials 25,000
Conversion Costs 30,0000

W.N

Equivalent units
Physical units Material Conversion
% completion Units % completion Units
Beginning work in process 10,000 0 0 60% 6,000
Units started and completed 20,000 100% 20,000 100% 20,000
Units transferred out 30,000
Ending work in process 5,000 100% 5,000 80% 4,000
Total 35,000 25,000 30,000
C. Cost per equivalent units:
Material cost per unit = $56,250 / 25,000 = $2.25
Conversion cost per unit = $106,500 / 30,000 = $3.55
d.
Cost of ending work in process:
Direct material (5,000*2.25) $ 11,250
Conversion cost (4,000*3.55) $ 14,200
$ 25,450
Cost of goods transferred out:
Beginning work in process:
Beginning balance $ 35,800
Further cost incurred $ 21,300
Total cost of beginning work in process $ 57,100
Started and completed:
Direct material (20000*2.25) $    45,000
Conversion cost (20000*3.55) $    71,000
Total cost of units started and completed $ 116,000
Total cost of goods transferred out $ 173,100
e. Cost reconciliation:
Cost to account for:
Beginning work in process $    35,800
Cost incurred $ 162,750
Total cost to account for $ 198,550
Cost accounted for:
Transferred out $ 173,100
Ending work in process $    25,450
Total cost accounted for $ 198,550

Related Solutions

FIFO Method, Two-Department Analysis Muskoge Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product that...
FIFO Method, Two-Department Analysis Muskoge Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product that is processed in two departments: Molding and Assembly. In the Molding Department, direct materials are added at the beginning of the process; in the Assembly Department, additional direct materials are added at the end of the process. In both departments, conversion costs are incurred uniformly throughout the process. As work is completed, it is transferred out. The following table summarizes the production activity and...
Muskoge Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product that is processed in two...
Muskoge Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product that is processed in two departments: Molding and Assembly. In the Molding Department, direct materials are added at the beginning of the process; in the Assembly Department, additional direct materials are added at the end of the processes. In both departments, conversion costs are incurred uniformly throughout the process. As work is completed, it is transferred out. The following table summarizes the production activity and costs for February: Molding...
Muskoge Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product that is processed in two...
Muskoge Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product that is processed in two departments: Molding and Assembly. In the Molding Department, direct materials are added at the beginning of the process; in the Assembly Department, additional direct materials are added at the end of the process. In both departments, conversion costs are incurred uniformly throughout the process. As work is completed, it is transferred out. The following table summarizes the production activity and costs for February: Beginning...
Muskoge Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product that is processed in two...
Muskoge Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product that is processed in two departments: Molding and Assembly. In the Molding Department, direct materials are added at the beginning of the process; in the Assembly Department, additional direct materials are added at the end of the process. In both departments, conversion costs are incurred uniformly throughout the process. As work is completed, it is transferred out. The following table summarizes the production activity and costs for February: Beginning...
Weighted Average Method, Journal Entries Muskoge Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product...
Weighted Average Method, Journal Entries Muskoge Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product that is processed in two departments: Molding and Assembly. In the Molding Department, direct materials are added at the beginning of the process; in the Assembly Department, additional direct materials are added at the end of the process. In both departments, conversion costs are incurred uniformly throughout the process. As work is completed, it is transferred out. The following table summarizes the production activity...
FIFO Method, Two-Department Analysis Healthway uses a process-costing system to compute the unit costs of the...
FIFO Method, Two-Department Analysis Healthway uses a process-costing system to compute the unit costs of the minerals that it produces. It has three departments: Mixing, Tableting, and Bottling. In Mixing, at the beginning of the process all materials are added and the ingredients for the minerals are measured, sifted, and blended together. The mix is transferred out in gallon containers. The Tableting Department takes the powdered mix and places it in capsules. One gallon of powdered mix converts to 1,600...
FIFO Method, Two-Department Analysis Healthway uses a process-costing system to compute the unit costs of the...
FIFO Method, Two-Department Analysis Healthway uses a process-costing system to compute the unit costs of the minerals that it produces. It has three departments: Mixing, Tableting, and Bottling. In Mixing, at the beginning of the process all materials are added and the ingredients for the minerals are measured, sifted, and blended together. The mix is transferred out in gallon containers. The Tableting Department takes the powdered mix and places it in capsules. One gallon of powdered mix converts to 1,600...
Pureform, Inc., uses the FIFO method in its process costing system. It manufactures a product that...
Pureform, Inc., uses the FIFO method in its process costing system. It manufactures a product that passes through two departments. Data for a recent month for the first department follow: Units Materials Labor Overhead Work in process inventory, beginning 68,000 $ 68,700 $ 22,800 $ 32,900 Units started in process 649,000 Units transferred out 670,000 Work in process inventory, ending 47,000 Cost added during the month $ 804,750 $ 239,590 $ 409,825 The beginning work in process inventory was 80%...
Pureform, Inc., uses the FIFO method in its process costing system. It manufactures a product that...
Pureform, Inc., uses the FIFO method in its process costing system. It manufactures a product that passes through two departments. Data for a recent month for the first department follow: Units Materials Labor Overhead Work in process inventory, beginning 79,000 $ 75,100 $ 36,400 $ 49,100 Units started in process 751,000 Units transferred out 800,000 Work in process inventory, ending 30,000 Cost added during the month $ 1,557,385 $ 612,440 $ 688,995 The beginning work in process inventory was 70%...
Pureform, Inc., uses the FIFO method in its process costing system. It manufactures a product that...
Pureform, Inc., uses the FIFO method in its process costing system. It manufactures a product that passes through two departments. Data for a recent month for the first department follow: Units Materials Labor Overhead Work in process inventory, beginning 5,000 $ 4,320 $ 1,040 $ 1,790 Units started in process 45,000 Units transferred out 42,000 Work in process inventory, ending 8,000 Cost added during the month $ 52,800 $ 21,500 $ 32,250 The beginning work in process inventory was 80%...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT