Question

In: Psychology

Explain Kholberg’s Sequence of Moral Reasoning Level 2.

Explain Kholberg’s Sequence of Moral Reasoning Level 2.

Solutions

Expert Solution

Hayet Jeridi answered 10 months ago
Next > < Previous

Related Solutions

Kohlberg’s second level of moral reasoning emphasizes Social contracts Social rules Universal ethical principles Rewards and...
Kohlberg’s second level of moral reasoning emphasizes Social contracts Social rules Universal ethical principles Rewards and punishment The type of moral reasoning that focuses on both social rules and the law is called Universal Conventional Postconventional Preconventional
Spiritual development may be viewed in terms of both moral reasoning / decision making and moral...
Spiritual development may be viewed in terms of both moral reasoning / decision making and moral emotions. Religious groups also often hold varied perspectives of emotional influence on moral decision making and religious practice ranging from a high emphasis on emotions and intuition to a de-emphasize or even rejection of emotions as valid. Discuss how various cognitive and physiological processes may affect morality as well as the role emotions play in morality and religious practice. Consider concepts of both positive...
Explain importance of gender in moral reasoning. Support your explanation with some modern times example(s).
Explain importance of gender in moral reasoning. Support your explanation with some modern times example(s).
Consider two types of consequentialist moral reasoning: utilitarianism and moral egoism. Consider also two types of...
Consider two types of consequentialist moral reasoning: utilitarianism and moral egoism. Consider also two types of non-consequentialist moral reasoning: virtue ethics and deontology. Which of these systems, if any, do you find most reasonable? Why?
How does moral reasoning fit into your religious or nonreligious theory?
How does moral reasoning fit into your religious or nonreligious theory?
Looking at moral reasoning in America, Carol Gilligan contends that the emphasis on autonomy and independence...
Looking at moral reasoning in America, Carol Gilligan contends that the emphasis on autonomy and independence is based on a masculine ideal, whereas a focus on social relationships, empathy, and interconnectedness lies at the heart of the feminist perspective. Please describe Gilligan’s case for gender bias in Kohlberg's theory of moral reasoning. How does she justify her argument? How does her theory of moral reasoning relate to Erikson’s ideas about the relationship between autonomy and intimacy?
Kohlberg's Three Levels of Morality This week’s lecture focused on moral development and ethical reasoning. As...
Kohlberg's Three Levels of Morality This week’s lecture focused on moral development and ethical reasoning. As part of your readings for the week, Kohlberg’s three levels of morality were discussed. How would you have answered Heinz’s dilemma? (See readings for the week for the full dilemma). Which of Kohlberg’s three levels of morality do you feel you are in? Do you feel you are in a different level of morality in different settings (i.e. work vs. personal life?) How has...
Kohlberg's Three Levels of Morality This week’s lecture focused on moral development and ethical reasoning. As...
Kohlberg's Three Levels of Morality This week’s lecture focused on moral development and ethical reasoning. As part of your readings for the week, Kohlberg’s three levels of morality were discussed. How would you have answered Heinz’s dilemma? (See readings for the week for the full dilemma). Which of Kohlberg’s three levels of morality do you feel you are in? Do you feel you are in a different level of morality in different settings (i.e. work vs. personal life?) How has...
[6 marks] A researcher was interested in finding out whether Moral Reasoning could be enhanced if...
[6 marks] A researcher was interested in finding out whether Moral Reasoning could be enhanced if students were taught using Moral Dilemmas. Subjects were given a Moral Reasoning Test before the treatment (using moral dilemmas) and after the treatment and the results are shown in Table 1 below. Table 1 : Mean Moral Reasoning Score Before and After Teaching Using Moral Dilemmas N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean Pretest 30 18.50 5.33 0.97 Posttest 30 23.86 4.75 0.87 Describe...
Apply the "three-legged stool" method of moral reasoning to the problem of the UNC Athletics scandal....
Apply the "three-legged stool" method of moral reasoning to the problem of the UNC Athletics scandal. What went wrong? Does the method of moral reasoning work? What are the key considerations here? Why could each of the three systems have a problem coming to the right answer if viewed individually? Does this problem go away if viewed collectively? (hint: think about the definitions under what circumstances will the "three-legged stool" method fail?)
ADVERTISEMENT
Subjects
ADVERTISEMENT
Latest Questions
ADVERTISEMENT