Question

In: Nursing

Consider two types of consequentialist moral reasoning: utilitarianism and moral egoism. Consider also two types of...

Consider two types of consequentialist moral reasoning: utilitarianism and moral egoism. Consider also two types of non-consequentialist moral reasoning: virtue ethics and deontology.

  • Which of these systems, if any, do you find most reasonable?
  • Why?

Solutions

Expert Solution

Consequentialist Moral reasoning

Consequentialism is the Ethical study of morals, duties and rights with an approach that focuses consequences of a particular action.

Utilitarianism and moral egoism are the two Consequentialist Moral reasoning.

Utilitarianism : It is a system of ethics based on the premise that something's value is measured by its usefulness.

Moral egoism: Egoism refers to the self -ism or selfishness, that individual behave in their own selfish way. Moral egoism also known as ethical egoism. It is the belief that the moral behaviour should be directed towards one's self interest only . Individual should act in his own desires and best interests.  

For example: An alcoholic act on his desire to drink ; Alcoholism cause many health problems that are not in one's best interests.

Non- Consequencialist moral reasoning:

Non - Consequentialist Moral reasoning is judging the value or moral of something , not based on its consequences, but based on its actions . Deontology and virtue ethics are two non - Consequentialist Moral reasoning.

Deontology : Normative ethical position that judges the morality of action based on the action's adherence to rules or obligations rather than either the inherent goodness or the consequences of those actions.

Virtue ethics: It is a moral theory, It emphasise on the development of virtuous character. It refers to the conformity of behaviour or thought with the strictures of morality.

Most reasonable system: In (my) Opinion, Non Consequentialist moral reasoning is most reasonable thinking system. Both Deontology and virtue ethics are not judging the things or activity based on the consequences, but on the conformity of the rules and regulations .

Utilitarianism is nof following the ethics every time as it just focus on the results . The result is justifying the ways and methods and it doesn't consider the right or wrong of actions performed. But Deontology always make sure that the method is correct or an action conform with rules and it is selecting only ethical ways to achieve an outcome. When you are conforming to rules and regulations, surely your result also will be good.  

For example: A nurse, who follows the rules and ' Rights' of medication  administration correctly , never fail in the procedure.  

Deontology as well as virtue ethics are morally in high standard, when comparing to Consequentialist moral reasoning; Utilitarianism and moral egoism.  


Related Solutions

Ethical Egoism and Utilitarianism are both consequentialist theories. As consequentialist theories, how are they similar? Also,...
Ethical Egoism and Utilitarianism are both consequentialist theories. As consequentialist theories, how are they similar? Also, what distinguishes them as distinct and different theories? Choose a or b to answer. Watch the film clip from Vertical Limit. How would a utilitarian evaluate Peter’s (Chris O’Donnell) decision to cut the rope? According to Thomson, what is morally required to someone to be justified in turning the trolley in order to kill only one person? Do you think you could meet this...
Describe the differences between ethical egoism, utilitarianism, and altruism. Give an example of each.
Describe the differences between ethical egoism, utilitarianism, and altruism. Give an example of each.
Briefly describe the basics of the following ethical theories: Egoism, Utilitarianism, and Kant’s Ethics.
Briefly describe the basics of the following ethical theories: Egoism, Utilitarianism, and Kant’s Ethics.
importance of Critical Examination of Utilitarianism as a Moral Principle.
importance of Critical Examination of Utilitarianism as a Moral Principle.
Utilitarianism offers a powerful and common sense consequentialist theory of ethics. Should we adopt it as...
Utilitarianism offers a powerful and common sense consequentialist theory of ethics. Should we adopt it as our theory of ethics? Base your answers on chapters 9 & 10 of Shafer-Landau.  
Which of these ethical theories: egoism, Utilitarianism, Kant and Deontology, First Formula of the Categorical imperative,...
Which of these ethical theories: egoism, Utilitarianism, Kant and Deontology, First Formula of the Categorical imperative, Second formula of the categorical imperative, or virtue ethics, would be most applicable in addressing accounting ethical dilemmas, why?
Give an example of a possible conflict between a consequentialist theory and a considered moral judgment....
Give an example of a possible conflict between a consequentialist theory and a considered moral judgment. (Show how these two may be inconsistent.) Think up an imaginary case and explain.
covers the moral theories of Mill’s utilitarianism, Kant’s deontology, and Aristotle’s virtue ethics. No other moral...
covers the moral theories of Mill’s utilitarianism, Kant’s deontology, and Aristotle’s virtue ethics. No other moral theories are permitted on this contains three moral dilemmas, each of which must be solved using a different moral theory. Be sure to cite your sources. Solve each of the following dilemmas using one of the following theories: Mill's utilitarianism, Kant's deontology, or Aristotle's virtue ethics. Explain the different aspects of the theory you are using, and clearly show how that theory prescribes a...
Compare and contrast the first two levels of Kohlberg’s stages of moral reasoning. How does a...
Compare and contrast the first two levels of Kohlberg’s stages of moral reasoning. How does a preschool child’s morality differ from that of a school-age child? What are two criticisms of Kohlberg’s theory? Do you think these criticisms are valid? Explain your thinking IN AROUND 200 WORDS PLEASE.
Spiritual development may be viewed in terms of both moral reasoning / decision making and moral...
Spiritual development may be viewed in terms of both moral reasoning / decision making and moral emotions. Religious groups also often hold varied perspectives of emotional influence on moral decision making and religious practice ranging from a high emphasis on emotions and intuition to a de-emphasize or even rejection of emotions as valid. Discuss how various cognitive and physiological processes may affect morality as well as the role emotions play in morality and religious practice. Consider concepts of both positive...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT