In: Accounting
IB Islamic Bank (IBIB) of Saudi Arabia entered into an Istisna' contract with the Government of Malaysia on 1st January 2014 for $100 million. IBIB is to construct a 4-storey-hospital to be completed and handed over to the Malaysia government on 31st December 2016.
IBIB and AZRB Corp
IBIB then entered into a parallel Istisna' contract with AZRB Corp for RM 80 million on 28th February 2014. The subcontract restricts any passing over to IBIB of any increase in costs up to an additional $20 million above the initial contract price. The agreement required billings by AZRB to IBIB at the end of each year to be paid promptly by IBIB on the 31st of January in the subsequent year. This was carried out as agreed.
During the second year the expected cost of the building went up by $30 million. However, in the third year the total cost was only $90 million and AZRB adjusted the final billing to reflect this.
The billings by AZRB to IBIB were as follows:
End of 2014 $30 million
End of 2015 $30 million
End of 2016 the balance
IBIB and the Malaysian Government
IBIB billed the Malaysian Government as follows:
Initial deposit 5%
End of Year 1 20%
End of Year 2 30%
End of Year 3 (when the building is handed over) 45%
The Malaysian government paid in the same year except for the last progress payment. Due to budgetary constraints, the Malaysia government could not pay IBIB the payment in Year 3. It requested IBIB to defer payment over another 3 years in equal instalments. IBIB then proposed a Murabaha contract to sell the remaining part of the building with a mark-up of 10% per annum over 3 years to the Malaysian government and it was duly agreed. This government paid IBIB the yearly instalments equally over the 3 years starting from 31st December 2017.
IBIB's policy
Istisna' contracts: percentage of completion method
Murabah: profits recognized in proportion to instalments received
Required:
a.
Year 2014
|
Dr ($) |
Cr ($) |
Istisna’ WIP |
30 million |
|
Istisna’ Account Payable (recognition of cost) |
|
30 million |
|
|
|
Cash |
5 million |
|
Istisna’ Billings (upon signing the contract) |
|
5 million |
|
|
|
Cash |
20 million |
|
Istisna’ Billings (receipts of billings) |
|
20 million |
|
|
|
Cost of Istisna’ Revenue |
30 million |
|
Istisna’ WIP |
7.5 million (30*[100-80]/80) |
|
Istisna’ Revenue (portion of revenue and profit recognized) |
|
37.5 million |
Year 2015
|
Dr ($) |
Cr ($) |
Istisna’ Account Payable |
30 million |
|
Cash (payment of outstanding cost - 2014) |
|
30 million |
|
|
|
Istisna’ WIP |
50 million |
|
Istisna’ Account Payable (recognition of cost) |
|
50 million |
|
|
|
Cash |
30 million |
|
Istisna’ Billings (receipts of billings) |
|
30 million |
|
|
|
Cost of Istisna’ Revenue |
30 million |
|
Istisna’ WIP |
|
7.5 million |
Istisna’ Revenue (portion of revenue and loss recognized) |
|
22.5 million |
Year 2016
|
Dr ($) |
Cr ($) |
Istisna’ Account Payable |
60 million |
|
Cash (payment of outstanding cost - 2015) |
|
60 million |
|
|
|
Istisna’ WIP |
10 million |
|
Istisna’ Account Payable (recognition of cost) |
|
10 million |
|
|
|
Cost of Istisna’ Revenue |
10 million |
|
Istisna’ WIP |
10 million (100-80-10) |
|
Istisna’ Revenue (portion of revenue and profit recognized) |
|
20 million |
b.
Cash Equivalent Value (CEV):
= 100 - (100 - 30 -50)
= 100 - 20
= 80
c.
Istisna’ WIP |
|||||
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
Year 2014 |
IAP |
30 million |
Year 2014 |
b/d |
37.5 million |
|
Istisna’ revenue |
7.5 million |
|
|
|
Year 2015 |
c/d |
37.5 million |
Year 2015 |
CEV |
80 million |
|
IAP |
50 million |
|
Istisna’ revenue |
7.5 million |
Year 2016 |
c/d |
80 million |
Year 2016 |
b/d |
100 million |
|
IAP |
10 million |
|
|
|
|
Istisna’ revenue |
10 million |
|
|
|
d.
Statement of Financial Position (extract) as at
|
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
Istisna’ WIP |
37.5 million |
80 million |
100 million |
100 million |
Less: Istisna’ billings |
25 million |
55 million |
100 million |
100 million |
Less: loss recognized |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Net Istisna’ WIP |
32 million |
25 million |
- |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Istisna’ account payable |
30 million |
50 million |
10 million |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Murabaha Financing |
- |
- |
58.5 million |
39 million |
Less: unearned income |
- |
- |
13.5 million |
9 million |
Net Murabaha financing |
- |
- |
45 million |
30 million |
Income Statement (extract) for the year ended
|
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
Istisna’ revenue |
37.5 million |
22.5 million |
20 million |
- |
Less: COIR |
30 million |
30 million |
10 million |
- |
|
7.5 million |
(7.5 million) |
10 million |
- |
Murabaha income |
- |
- |
- |
4.5 million |
Profit/(Loss) |
7.5 million |
(7.5 million) |
10 million |
4.5 million |
e.
Year 2016
|
Dr ($) |
Cr ($) |
Murabaha Financing |
58.5 million |
|
Istisna’ Billings |
|
45 million |
Unearned Murabaha Income (convert to Murabaha contract) |
|
13.5 million |
Year 2017
|
Dr ($) |
Cr ($) |
Istisna’ Account Payable |
10 million |
|
Cash |
|
10 million |
Year 2017, 2018, 2019
|
Dr ($) |
Cr ($) |
Cash |
19.5 million |
|
Murabaha Financing (receipts of Murabaha instalments) |
|
19.5 million |
|
|
|
Unearned Murabaha Income |
4.5 million (10%*45) |
|
Murabaha Income |
|
4.5 million |
f.
Bai Bithamam Ajil or BBA means a deferred payment sale. Using this contract, the Islamic bank may finance the customer who wishes to acquire a given asset but to defer the payment of the asset for a specific period or to pay by instalment. The assets that the customer wishes to purchase for example, are bought by the bank and sold to the customer at an agreed price. An agreed price will include the bank's mark-up profit. However, it has proven to be quite unsatisfactory to the customers and bankers. Customers are particularly unhappy when it comes to early redemption or in the event of default as BBA carries a higher financing balance as compared to the conventional housing loan.
Therefore, Istisna’ contract is more preferable to finance an unfinished house. According to Islamic perspective, Istisna’ is debt financing. For a buyer to buy a house is taking a risk in their financial process. Furthermore, they intend to buy houses under construction. The commission to manufacture contract is concluded through the offer and acceptance of the buyer and seller or manufacturer. Since the housings’ pricing is increasing every year. Buying a house under construction is a riskier to the customer and the contractor. Therefore, sales and purchase of non-existent or a house that is still under construction treated as gharar is revised under this contract.
Another Islamic contract that can be used to finance a house other than Murabaha where ultimate ownership is transferred to the customer is Musharakah Mutanaqisah (diminishing partnership). Musharakah Mutanaqisah or MM contract combines two basic Islamic concepts. First, the customer enters into a partnership (musharakah) under the concept of Shirkat al-milk (joint ownership) agreement with the bank. Secondly, the bank leases its share in the house ownership to the customer under the concept of Ijarah (leasing). Under the MM contract, the customer pays a down payment as his equity share while the remaining balance is paid off by the bank. The bank leases the house so acquired to the customer and the bank receives rental from the customer in return. The customer and bank co-own the property with an initial pre-determined share of ownership. For example, the client owns 20 percent while the bank owns 80 percent of the property. The customer will gradually redeem the equity share of the bank through the financing period until the full amount is paid. The MM contract ends when the property is 100 percent owned by the customer and the ownership title is transferred to the customer.
Refer answer details for question a, b, c, d, e and f