In: Operations Management
What is a comprehensive look at the blending of theory and practice in Education which include Ethics, Integrity, and Fairness into the blending of theory and practice? Please provide reference source with answer.
Below is a complete list of the Educational Leadership Constituent Council (ELCC):
Educational Leadership Constituent Council (ELCC) Standards
· Educational Vision – An educational leader who guides, facilitates, and supports the success of all learners by developing, articulating, implementing, and evaluating an educational vision that is shared and supported by the greater school community.
· School Culture – An educational leader who guides, facilitates, and supports the success of all learners by advocating, nurturing, and sustain a school culture that is shared and supported by the greater school community.
· Management – An educational leader who guides, facilitates, and supports the success of all learners by managing operations and resources to provide a safe, efficient, and effective learning environment.
· Communication and Collaboration with Communities – An educational leader who guides, facilitates, and supports the success of learners by practicing open, two-way communication and using collaborative strategies that respond to diverse community interests and needs. Acting with Honesty, Fairness, and Professional Ethics – An educational leader who guides, facilitates, and supports the success of all learners by personally demonstrating and promoting honesty, fairness, and professional ethics.
· The Political, Social, Legal, Economic, and Cultural Environments – An educational leader who guides, facilitates, and supports the success of all learners by understanding, responding to, and influencing larger political, social, legal, economic, and cultural environments and by recommending and implementing policy that guides district operations.
· Internship Practicum (Field Experience) of Standards-based Work in Real Settings – An educational leader synthesizes and applies the knowledge and practice to develop the skills identified in Standards 1-6 through substantial, sustained, standards-based work that is planned and guided cooperatively by the institution and school district personnel (or university, college, or business personnel as appropriate).
Subject is Education
The purpose of the Conceptual Framework (CF) as it relates to is to provide a foundation and organizational system through accomplishment of the primary objective,
Standard 1: Human Capital Management Educational leaders use their role as human capital manager to drive improvements in building leader effectiveness and student achievement.
Standard 2: Instructional Leadership Educational leaders are acutely focused on effective teaching and learning, possess a deep and comprehensive understanding of best instructional practices, and continuously promote activities that contribute to the academic success of all students.
Standard 3: Personal Behavior Educational leaders model personal behavior that sets the tone for all student and adult relationships.
Standard 4: Building Relationships Educational leaders build relationships to ensure that all key stakeholders work effectively with each other to achieve transformative results.
Standard 5: Culture of Achievement Educational leaders develop an encompassing culture of achievement aligned to the institution’s vision of success for every student.
Standard 6: Organizational, Operational, and Resource Management Educational leaders’ leverage organizational, operational, and resource management skills to support improvement and achieve desired educational outcomes.
In today’s higher education landscape, the academic focus is no
longer just on theoretical knowledge. More and more programmes are
offering more opportunities for students to ‘learn through doing’,
or in other words, engage in practical learning.Blending theory
with practice is immensely beneficial, giving students a deeper
understanding of a subject matter while cementing their
understanding through hands-on activities.
Students were surveyed to determine overall effectiveness in
relation to student engagement and excitement. Over 350 students
were surveyed from eight courses: four “blended” courses with
online philosophy lectures and four control courses with philosophy
faculty. With the online method, a significantly higher proportion
of the students (79%) reported an increase in confidence in
navigating ethical dilemmas compared the students in the control
group (61%). Over 90% of the students reported that they could
identify, analyze, and handle an ethical situations regardless of
approach. A greater percentage of the students with the “blended”
method were interested in having ethics incorporated into other
engineering classes (87%) compared to the previous method (67%).
These results support our hypothesis that a “blended” method is as
effective in getting students to engage with and be interested in
ethics as the “joint-venture” approach, while allowing for the
possibility of easier scaling of the model without the requirement
of philosophy faculty to lead each in-class discussion.
Just as plagiarism, cheating, and other ethical breaches are
important concerns
in the on-ground classroom, academic integrity must be fostered and
encouraged
in the classroom. Student success and achievement of learning
outcomes
depends not only on enforcing policies to eliminate cheating and
plagiarism, but
also on creating a culture where students understand and endorse
the importance
of ethical academic practices. Leaders in the move to the hybrid
and blended format
must be sure to set standards for students that are clear, suited
to the online mode
and available technology, and in alignment with their own
institution’s academic
standards and policies.After deciding which approach will best
allow you to implement your institution’s standards of academic
integrity in your hybrid and blended classrooms, consider some of
the following instructional design
techniques to further encourage academic integrity:
• Make your institution’s policies on plagiarism, cheating, and
academic integrity easily available and
highlighted within the online classroom.
• Use prominent areas within the online classroom to discuss and
actively engage students in a culture
of academic integrity.
• Implement educational technologies which check for plagiarism and
the misuse of paraphrasing and
citation, such as Safe Assign or TurnItIn.
• Encourage instructors to create custom exams and assessments,
rather than relying on test banks,
which are often easily found on the internet.
• When possible, use short answer, essay assignments, or insist
that students show their work for any
quantitative assignments.
In all fairness, the benefits of striking a balance between
theoretical and practical knowledge are endless. Blending
theoretical and practical wisdom should be seen as producing
bookworms who possesses adequate industrial exposure in addition to
being street smart.
By applying knowledge through engaging in real-world projects,
students don’t just improve their learning but also boost their
employability.In today’s competitive workplace, students are
looking for academic programmes in which they earn much more than a
degree.They also want to develop skills increasingly sought by
employers, such as analytical skills, critical thinking skills,
innovative thinking, and collaborative thinking.These skills are
best developed through real working world scenarios, which is where
the university comes in.Higher education providers are offering
industry-linked projects, internships, field work and more as part
of the course structure, so students have valuable work experience
that makes them more attractive to employers.The merging of theory
and practice is being seen across the board in higher education,
meaning it’s gaining traction across all kinds of academic
programmes and departments.But experiential learning looks
different depending on the department. While for business students,
it means workshops or internships, those in the Sciences benefit
from early exposure to lab settings where they can learn through
hands-on research.Business is an applied discipline. Unlike Physics
and Chemistry, there are often multiple answers to the same
question — say pricing a new offering — depending on scope, scale,
short-term versus longer-term perspectives, tangible products
versus experiential services in developed versus emerging market
contexts. These decisions require debate, tradeoffs, experiential
learning. They also require a modicum of maturity and on-the-job
experience so learning is based on the ability to ask the right
questions to contribute to the dialogue — not on note taking and
rote learning. The ISB’s post-experience programmes ensure that
students come with adequate experience. Additionally, we recruit to
build experiential diversity from across multiple industries. We do
provide deferred admission to exceptional students without
experience in our Young Leaders’ Programme but ask them to work for
at least two years before joining ISB. We are also trying to
increase the experiential components in our programmes, subject to
constraints imposed by our one-year term structure.
In short, what is missing in the majority of management sessions and institutes is a perfect blend of theory and practice. Our job as instructors is to dissect the theoretical underpinnings and convert them into practical terms. If management skills are taught theoretically without any industry exposure and insights, then students may not be able to apply them in their day-to-day operations in future.
Reference:http://www.businessworld.in/article/Blending-Theory-With-Practice/21-11-2017-132359/