Question

In: Finance

Radstone, Inc Part 1- Static Theory An enduring controversy within financial theory concerns the effect of...

Radstone, Inc

Part 1- Static Theory

An enduring controversy within financial theory concerns the effect of financial leverage on the value and stock price of a company. Can a company affect its overall value by selecting an optimal financing mix (debt and equity)? The firm’s mix of debt and equity financing is called its capital structure. The essentials of the capital structure and the effect of financial policies on the value of the firm were pioneering work of Noble recipients Modigliani and Miller in 1958 and 1963.1

The essential question is: Does debt financing create value? If so, how? If not, then why do so many financial mangers try to find the combination of securities that has greatest overall effect on the market value of the firm?

This short case presents a simple model of Modigliani-Miller theorem to highlight the advantage of debt financing and whether there is an optimal capital structure that maximizes the value of the firm. However, it ignores other market imperfections such as bankruptcy and agency problems among security holders that would affect the value of the firm.

Radstone, Inc., a prominent stone fabrication firm was formed 5 years ago to exploit a new continuous fabrication process. Radstone's founders, Jim Rad and Mick Rad, had been employed in the research department of a major integrated-stone fabrication company, but when that company decided against using the new process, they decided to strike out on their own. One advantage of the new process was that it required relatively little capital in comparison with the typical fabrication company, so they have been able to avoid issuing debt financing, and thus they own all of the shares. However, the company has now reached the stage where outside capital is necessary if the firm is to achieve its growth targets. Therefore, they have decided to leverage the company with swapping some of their shares with new debt.

Currently the company has value of $5 million with outstanding shares of 100,000. The company generates $1,538,461.5 in earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) in perpetuity. The corporate tax rate is 35 percent and all earnings are paid as dividends. The company is considering the effect of $2 million and $2.5 million debt –equity swap on its cost of capital and its value. The cost of debt is 10 percent and the cost of capital is currently 20 percent. Any investment in net working capital and capital expenditure is equal to its depreciation allowances. The corporate tax rate is 35 percent.

Table 1

Current

Debt

Debt

Capital Structure

Book Value of Debt              

$-

$2,000,000

$2,500,000

Book Value of Equity             

$5,000,000

$3,000,000

$2,500,000

V=D+E

$5,000,000

$5,000,000

$5,000,000

Market Value of Debt             

$2,000,000

$2,500,000

Market Value of Equity        

V=D+E

Pretax Cost of Debt                  

10.00%

10.00%

10.00%

After-Tax Cost of Debt (tax rate 35%)

6.50%

6.50%

6.50%

Market Value Weights of

Debt  

Equity

Cost of Equity       

20.00%

Weighted-Average Cost of Capital     

20.00%

EBIT                          

$ 1,538,461.50

$   1,538,461.50

$    1,538,461.50

Taxes (@ 35%)     

Net Income

+ Depreciation

-change in NWC

-Capital exp.

Free Cash Flow    

Value of Firm (FCF/WACC)     

Solutions

Expert Solution

Situation 1- cost of equity remains constant
Current Capital Structure Debt 1 Debt 2
Book Value of Debt               $0 $2,000,000 $2,500,000
Book Value of Equity              $5,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,500,000
V=D+E (BV) $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $5,000,000
Pretax Cost of Debt                   10.00% 10.00% 10.00%
After-Tax Cost of Debt (tax rate 35%) 6.50% 6.50% 6.50%
Book Value Weights of
Debt   0.00% 40.00% 50.00%
Equity 100.00% 60.00% 50.00%
Cost of Equity 20.00% 20.00% 20.00%
Weighted-Average Cost of Capital (WACC) 20.00% 14.60% 13.25%
EBIT                           $1,538,462 $1,538,462 $1,538,462
Interest expense $0 $200,000 $250,000
EBT $1,538,462 $1,338,462 $1,288,462
Taxes (@ 35%)      $538,462 $468,462 $450,962
Net Income $1,000,000 $1,070,000 $1,087,500
EBIT * (1- tax rate@35%) $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000
+ Depreciation - change in NWC - Capital exp. $0 $0 $0
Free Cash Flow to Firm (FCFF) $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000
Value of Firm (FCFF/WACC)      $5,000,000 $6,849,315 $7,547,170
Market Value of Debt              $0 $2,000,000 $2,500,000
Market Value of Equity         $5,000,000 $4,849,315 $5,047,170
V=D+E (MV) $5,000,000 $6,849,315 $7,547,170

FCFF = earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) x (1 - tax rate) + depreciation - long-term investments - investments in working capital
Here, Depreciation + (change in NWC + Capital exp.)
We need either cost of equity or market value of equity to calculate the other value. Since MV of equity is not given, it can be calculated as MV of firm - MV of debt
Cost of equity is assumed to constant. In this situation, the lower cost of debt and tax shield lower the WACC. Hence, even for stable FCFF, the MV of firm increases. This assumption is based on the fact stated in the case that 'ignore the market imperfections such as bankruptcy and agency problems among security holders that would affect the value of the firm.' This indirectly implies that the additional leverage is not seen as a cause of concern by the equity holders and their stated return on equity is constant.
Alternatively, if the additional leverage is a concern for equity holders, we can calculate Cost of equity = net income/ BV of equity. This is because all earnings are paid as dividend. Hence, this is the rate equity holders expect. Also, as per this table, no growth is expected in the earnings. Hence, the MV of firm can be calculated as a perpetuity of FCFF/ WACC. This is a modification of the Gordon Growth model. This gives us situation 2
As seen from situation 1, the FCFF increases with leverage. Since the cost of equity is not increasing with additional leverage, the MV of firm and MV of equity is increasing. However, this is not seen in practice where bankruptcy risk and additional leverage increase the cost of equity and WACC. In situation 2, the MV of firm and MV of equity is decreasing with additional leverage. This is because all the benefit generated from leverage and tax shield is already factored in the cost of equity

Situation 2- cost of equity changes with additional leverage
Current Capital Structure Debt 1 Debt 2
Book Value of Debt               $0 $2,000,000 $2,500,000
Book Value of Equity              $5,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,500,000
V=D+E (BV) $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $5,000,000
Pretax Cost of Debt                   10.00% 10.00% 10.00%
After-Tax Cost of Debt (tax rate 35%) 6.50% 6.50% 6.50%
Book Value Weights of
Debt   0.00% 40.00% 50.00%
Equity 100.00% 60.00% 50.00%
Cost of Equity (=net income/ BV of equity) 20.00% 35.67% 43.50%
Weighted-Average Cost of Capital (WACC) 20.00% 24.00% 25.00%
EBIT                           $1,538,462 $1,538,462 $1,538,462
Interest expense $0 $200,000 $250,000
EBT $1,538,462 $1,338,462 $1,288,462
Taxes (@ 35%)      $538,462 $468,462 $450,962
Net Income $1,000,000 $1,070,000 $1,087,500
EBIT * (1- tax rate@35%) $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000
+ Depreciation - change in NWC - Capital exp. $0 $0 $0
Free Cash Flow to Firm (FCFF) $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000
Value of Firm (FCFF/WACC)      $5,000,000 $4,166,667 $4,000,000
Market Value of Debt              $0 $2,000,000 $2,500,000
Market Value of Equity         $5,000,000 $2,166,667 $1,500,000
V=D+E (MV) $5,000,000 $4,166,667 $4,000,000

Related Solutions

What incentive mechanisms are in part responsible for the financial crisis of 2008? Within investment banks?...
What incentive mechanisms are in part responsible for the financial crisis of 2008? Within investment banks? Within lenders? Within government (sponsored) agencies? Historical actions by the government with respect to the financial sector?
Assignment 8: Concerns Around Telehealth Part 1: Reflect on the scenario. You are a registered nurse...
Assignment 8: Concerns Around Telehealth Part 1: Reflect on the scenario. You are a registered nurse who works with wound care patients. J. S. is a 34 year-old woman who had a mastectomy six weeks ago. She developed a staph infection and the surgical site was debrided as part of the treatment. You now care for J. S. at her home and photograph her wound. The photos are sent to the multidisciplinary care team at the wound center. The team...
Part 1. Using the financial data presented below (in alphabetical order) for Amos Moving Services, Inc.,...
Part 1. Using the financial data presented below (in alphabetical order) for Amos Moving Services, Inc., develop a set of financial statements (Income Statement, Retained Earnings Statement, and Balance Sheet) for the year ending December 31, 2017. You must prepare these in accordance with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission approved “Generally Accepted Accounting Principles” (GAAP). Account Description Balance Accounts payable $1,200 Accounts receivable 10,340 Buildings 157,630 Capital stock 25,000 Cash 32,320 Dividends 16,570 Fees earned 84,350 Land 47,000...
1. Describe attribution theory. In your opinion, does attribution theory play a part in how you...
1. Describe attribution theory. In your opinion, does attribution theory play a part in how you would trust your superior in the workplace? Explain
1. Within the financial statements how will management use the financial statements to mitigate their risk...
1. Within the financial statements how will management use the financial statements to mitigate their risk as it pertains to their current liabilities? Who else will be focused on them and why? 2. What are contingent liabilities and why is management and others concerned about them?
1) Discuss the “hegemonic stability” theory and its practices (in case of) within the international relations...
1) Discuss the “hegemonic stability” theory and its practices (in case of) within the international relations system. 2)Discuss the arguments of Robert Cox regarding the international relations system. Do you agree with him? Why/why not? 3) Do we witness a struggle currently for the hegemony within international relations system? Write the facts-samples to prove your argument
1. Why are the notes to the financial statements an integral part of the financial statements?...
1. Why are the notes to the financial statements an integral part of the financial statements? Provide an example of what might be in the notes. 2. What is included in the summary of significant accounting policies disclosure? Provide an example of what might be included. 3. How does the role of the FASB differ from that of the Securities and Exchange Commission with regard to the establishment of accounting standards?
1. Why are the notes to the financial statements an integral part of the financial statements?...
1. Why are the notes to the financial statements an integral part of the financial statements? Provide an example of what might be in the notes. 2. What is included in the summary of significant accounting policies disclosure? Provide an example of what might be included. 3. How does the role of the FASB differ from that of the Securities and Exchange Commission with regard to the establishment of accounting standards?
1. What is the interest parity theory? Explain what would be the short run effect on...
1. What is the interest parity theory? Explain what would be the short run effect on the won/dollar exchange rate if the interest rate increased in the U.S but remained unchanged in Korea. 2. How does the asset approach explain the overshooting in nominal exchange rates that is often observed in foreign exchange markets today? 3. Let us assume the home central bank increases the money supply permanently. What will happen to nominal exchange rates both in the short run...
Part A – Consumer Theory 1) Imagine a hospital who is a consumer of medical masks...
Part A – Consumer Theory 1) Imagine a hospital who is a consumer of medical masks (x) and ventilators (y). The hospital administrator in charge of purchasing these has the following utility function: U (x,y) = x2 + y e. What is the Marshallian Demand function for ventilators? f. What is the Hicksian Demand function for medical masks? g. What is the Hicksian Demand function for ventilators? h. Economically, how are the Marshallian and Hicksian demand functions different? i. What...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT