In: Accounting
Vertical Analysis of Income Statement
For 20Y2, Tri-Comic Company initiated a sales promotion campaign that included the expenditure of an additional $12,000 for advertising. At the end of the year, Lumi Neer, the president, is presented with the following condensed comparative income statement:
Tri-Comic Company
Comparative Income Statement
For the Years Ended December 31, 20Y2 and 20Y1
20Y2 20Y1
Sales $440,000 $378,000
Cost of goods sold 228,800 215,460
Gross profit $211,200 $162,540
Selling expenses $83,600 $68,040
Administrative expenses 44,000 45,360
Total operating expenses $127,600 $113,400
Income from operations $83,600 $49,140
Other income 17,600 22,680
Income before income tax $101,200 $71,820
Income tax expense 39,600 30,240
Net income $61,600 $41,580
Required:
1. Prepare a comparative income statement for the two-year period, presenting an analysis of each item in relationship to sales for each of the years. Enter percentages as whole numbers. Enter all amounts as positive numbers.
Tri-Comic Company
Comparative Income Statement
For the Years Ended December 31, 20Y2 and 20Y1
20Y2 Amount 20Y2 Percent 20Y1 Amount 20Y1 Percent
Sales $440,000 % $378,000 %
Cost of goods sold 228,800 % 215,460 %
Gross profit $211,200 % $162,540 %
Selling expenses 83,600 % 68,040 %
Administrative expenses 44,000 % 45,360 %
Total operating expenses $127,600 % $113,400 %
Income from operations $83,600 % $49,140 %
Other income 17,600 % 22,680 %
Income before income tax $101,200 % $71,820 %
Income tax expense 39,600 % 30,240 %
Net income $61,600 % $41,580 %
2. The vertical analysis indicates that the costs other than selling expenses (cost of goods sold and administrative expenses) as a percentage of sales. As a result, net income as a percentage of sales . The sales promotion campaign appears to have been . While selling expenses as a percent of sales slightly, the cost was more than made up for by sales.
Amount 20Y2 | Percent | Amount 20Y1 | Percent | ||
Sales | 440000 | 100% | 378000 | 100% | |
Cost of goods sold | 228800 | 52% | 215460 | 57% | |
Gross profit | 211200 | 48% | 162540 | 43% | |
Selling expenses | 83600 | 19% | 68040 | 18% | |
Administrative expenses | 44000 | 10% | 45360 | 12% | |
Total operating expenses | 127600 | 29% | 113400 | 30% | |
Income from operations | 83600 | 19% | 49140 | 13% | |
Other income | 17600 | 4% | 22680 | 6% | |
Income before income tax | 101200 | 23% | 71820 | 19% | |
Income tax expense | 39600 | 9% | 30240 | 8% | |
Net income | 61600 | 14% | 41580 | 11% | |
2 | |||||
The vertical analysis indicates that the costs other than selling expenses (cost of goods sold and administrative expenses) improved as a percentage of sales | |||||
As a result, net income as a percentage of sales increased. The sales promotion campaign appears to have been successful. | |||||
While selling expenses as a percent of sales increased slightly, the increased cost was more than made up for by increased sales. | |||||