Question

In: Accounting

THE Company operates two departments, Department L and Department Q. THE Company uses a FIFO process...

THE Company operates two departments, Department L and
Department Q. THE Company uses a FIFO process costing
system. Department L reported the following inventory
information for June:

                                     % complete    % complete
                            units       DM          conversion 
work in process, June  1    14,000      24%           79%
work in process, June 30    18,000      65%           41%

The cost of beginning work in process and the costs added
during June in Department L were as follows:

                                   DM             Conversion
work in process, June 1         $ 36,804           $ 24,660
costs incurred during June       288,298            266,328

During June, Department L completed 53,000 units and
transferred them to Department Q.

Part A.) The cost to complete the units in beginning work in
process was equal to:

Group of answer choices

$75,516

$70,774

$61,464

$73,738

$83,062

$79,936

$65,884

$73,629

Part B.) Department L's work in process inventory balance at June 30 was equal to:

Group of answer choices

$80,790

$94,842

$102,195

$105,552

$181,800

$192,708

$193,818

$196,281

Part C.) The cost of goods started and completed in June for Department L was equal to:

Group of answer choices

$434,300

$521,248

$393,900

$170,174

$436,800

$554,626

$381,657

$473,836

Solutions

Expert Solution

UNITS TO ACCOUNT FOR:
Beginning Work in Process units 14,000
Add: Units Started in Process 57,000
Total Units to account for: 71,000
UNITS TO BE ACCOUNTED FOR:
Units completed from beginning WIP 14000
Units started and completed 39,000
Ending Work in Process 18,000
Total Units to be accounted for: 71,000
Equivalent Units:
UNITS Material Cost Conversion
% Completion Units % Completion Units
Units completed from Beg. 14000 76% 10,640 21% 2,940
Units started and completed 39000 100% 39,000 100% 39,000
Ending Work in Process 18000 65% 11,700 41% 7,380
Total Equivalent units 71000 61,340 49,320
TOTAL COST TO ACCOUNT FOR:
Material Conversion
Cost incurred 2,88,298 2,66,328
Total Cost to account for: 2,88,298 2,66,328
Equivalent Units 61,340 49,320
Cost per Equivalent unit 4.7 5.4
TOTAL COST ACCOUNTED FOR:
Units completed from Beg. Wip (14000 units)
Equivalent unit Cost per EU Total Cost
Cost of beginning WIP 61464
Material 10,640 4.7 50008
Conversion Cost 2,940 5.4 15876
Total cost to complete beginning WIP 127348
Cost to complete the beginning WIP (50008+15876): 65884
Units started and completed (39000 units)
Equivalent unit Cost per EU Total Cost
Material 39,000 4.7 183300
Conversion Cost 39,000 5.4 210600
Total cost of units started and complted 393900
Total cost of units transferred out 521248
Ending Work in process (18000 units)
Equivalent unit Cost per EU Total Cost
Material 11,700 4.7 54990
Conversison Cost 7,380 5.4 39852
Total cost of Ending Work in process: 94,842
Req A:
Answer is $ 65884
Part B:
Answer is $ 94,842
Part C:
Answer is $ 393900

Related Solutions

THE Company operates two departments, Department L and Department Q. THE Company uses a FIFO process...
THE Company operates two departments, Department L and Department Q. THE Company uses a FIFO process costing system. Department L reported the following inventory information for June: % complete % complete units DM conversion work in process, June 1 14,000 24% 79% work in process, June 30 18,000 65% 41% The cost of beginning work in process and the costs added during June in Department L were as follows: DM Conversion work in process, June 1 $ 36,804 $ 24,660...
THE Company operates two departments, Department L and Department Q. THE Company uses a FIFO process...
THE Company operates two departments, Department L and Department Q. THE Company uses a FIFO process costing system. Department L reported the following inventory information for June: % complete % complete units DM conversion work in process, June 1 18,000 28% 67% work in process, June 30 34,000 71% 57% The cost of beginning work in process and the costs added during June in Department L were as follows: DM Conversion work in process, June 1 $ 35,240 $ 45,792...
THE Company operates two departments, Department L and Department Q. THE Company uses a FIFO process...
THE Company operates two departments, Department L and Department Q. THE Company uses a FIFO process costing system. Department L reported the following inventory information for June: % complete % complete units DM conversion work in process, June 1 18,000 28% 67% work in process, June 30 34,000 71% 57% The cost of beginning work in process and the costs added during June in Department L were as follows: DM Conversion work in process, June 1 $ 35,240 $ 45,792...
THE Company operates two departments, Department L and Department Q. THE Company uses a FIFO process...
THE Company operates two departments, Department L and Department Q. THE Company uses a FIFO process costing system. Department L reported the following inventory information for June: % complete % complete units DM conversion work in process, June 1 18,000 28% 67% work in process, June 30 34,000 71% 57% The cost of beginning work in process and the costs added during June in Department L were as follows: DM Conversion work in process, June 1 $ 35,240 $ 45,792...
THE Company operates two departments, Department L and Department Q. THE Company uses a FIFO process...
THE Company operates two departments, Department L and Department Q. THE Company uses a FIFO process costing system. Department L reported the following inventory information for June: % complete % complete units DM conversion work in process, June 1 18,000 28% 67% work in process, June 30 34,000 71% 57% The cost of beginning work in process and the costs added during June in Department L were as follows: DM Conversion work in process, June 1 $ 35,240 $ 45,792...
THE Company operates two departments, Department L and Department Q. THE Company uses a FIFO process...
THE Company operates two departments, Department L and Department Q. THE Company uses a FIFO process costing system. Department L reported the following inventory information for June: % complete % complete units DM conversion work in process, June 1 18,000 28% 67% work in process, June 30 34,000 71% 57% The cost of beginning work in process and the costs added during June in Department L were as follows: DM Conversion work in process, June 1 $ 35,240 $ 45,792...
THE Company operates a single processing department and uses a FIFO process costing system. The equivalent...
THE Company operates a single processing department and uses a FIFO process costing system. The equivalent units for August were calculated as 88,620 for direct materials and 73,910 for conversion. THE Company's work in process at August 1 was: % complete % complete units DM conversion work in process, Aug. 1 36,000 55% 26% The cost of beginning work in process and the costs added during August were as follows: DM Conversion work in process, Aug. 1 $ 44,310 $...
THE Company operates a single processing department and uses a FIFO process costing system. The equivalent...
THE Company operates a single processing department and uses a FIFO process costing system. The equivalent units for August were calculated as 88,620 for direct materials and 73,910 for conversion. THE Company's work in process at August 1 was: % complete % complete units DM conversion work in process, Aug. 1 36,000 59% 25% The cost of beginning work in process and the costs added during August were as follows: DM Conversion work in process, Aug. 1 $ 44,310 $...
FIFO Method, Two-Department Analysis Muskoge Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product that...
FIFO Method, Two-Department Analysis Muskoge Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product that is processed in two departments: Molding and Assembly. In the Molding Department, direct materials are added at the beginning of the process; in the Assembly Department, additional direct materials are added at the end of the process. In both departments, conversion costs are incurred uniformly throughout the process. As work is completed, it is transferred out. The following table summarizes the production activity and...
FIFO Method, Two-Department Analysis Muskoge Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product that...
FIFO Method, Two-Department Analysis Muskoge Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product that is processed in two departments: Molding and Assembly. In the Molding Department, direct materials are added at the beginning of the process; in the Assembly Department, additional direct materials are added at the end of the process. In both departments, conversion costs are incurred uniformly throughout the process. As work is completed, it is transferred out. The following table summarizes the production activity and...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT