Question

In: Accounting

THE Company operates two departments, Department L and Department Q. THE Company uses a FIFO process...

THE Company operates two departments, Department L and
Department Q. THE Company uses a FIFO process costing
system. Department L reported the following inventory
information for June:

                                     % complete    % complete
                            units       DM          conversion 
work in process, June  1    14,000      24%           79%
work in process, June 30    18,000      65%           41%

The cost of beginning work in process and the costs added
during June in Department L were as follows:

                                   DM             Conversion
work in process, June 1         $ 36,804           $ 24,660
costs incurred during June       288,298            266,328

During June, Department L completed 53,000 units and
transferred them to Department Q.

The cost to complete the units in beginning work in
process was equal to:

Group of answer choices

$75,516

$70,774

$61,464

$73,738

$83,062

$79,936

Part B.) Department L's work in process inventory balance at June 30 was equal to:

Group of answer choices

$80,790

$94,842

$102,195

$105,552

$181,800

$192,708

$193,818

$196,281

Part C.) The cost of goods started and completed in June for Department L was equal to:

Group of answer choices

$434,300

$521,248

$393,900

$170,174

$436,800

$554,626

$381,657

$473,836

Solutions

Expert Solution

Question 1

Correct answer-------------$127,348

Question 2

Correct answer-------------$94,842

Question 3

Correct answer-------------$521,248

Working

STEP 1 (FIFO)
Reconciliation of Units
Units % already completed % completed this period
Material Conversion Material Conversion
Beginning WIP             14,000 24% 79% 76% 21%
Units introduced             57,000
Total units to be accounted for             71,000
Completed and Transferred unit             53,000 0% 0% 100% 100%
Ending WIP             18,000 0% 0% 65% 41%

.

STEP 2 (FIFO)
Equivalent Units
Total Units Material Conversion
Units Transferred: % completed this period Equivalent Units % completed this period Equivalent Units
From WIP             14,000 76%                   10,640 21%                          2,940
From units started/Introduced             39,000 100%                   39,000 100%                        39,000
Total             53,000                   49,640                        41,940
Total Units Material Conversion
Ending WIP % completed this period Equivalent Units % completed this period Equivalent Units
Total             18,000 65%                   11,700 41%                          7,380
Total EUP             71,000                   61,340                        49,320

.

STEP 3
Cost per Equivalent Units AND Cost to be accounted for
Material Conversion TOTAL
Cost incurred in Current Period $ 288,298 $ 266,328 $ 554,626
Total Equivalent Units                                              61,340                                                       49,320
Cost per Equivalent Units $ 4.70 $ 5.40 $ 10.10
Cost of Beginning WIP $ 36,804 $ 24,660 $ 61,464
Total cost to be accounted for $ 616,090

.

STEP 4
Cost report [Including Reconciliation]
Cost of Units Transferred               53,000.00 units
Equivalent Units [Step 2] Cost per Equivalent Units [Step 3] Cost of Units Transferred TOTAL
A From Beginning WIP:
Material                  10,640 $ 4.70 $ 50,008
Conversion                     2,940 $ 5.40 $ 15,876 $ 65,884
B From units started & completed
Material                  39,000 $ 4.70 $ 183,300
Conversion                  39,000 $ 5.40 $ 210,600 $ 393,900
C=A+B Total $ 459,784
D Cost of Beginning WIP $ 61,464
E=C+D Total Cost of Units transferred $           521,248.00
Cost of Ending WIP               18,000.00 units
Equivalent Units [Step 2] Cost per Equivalent Units [Step 3] Cost of Ending WIP TOTAL
F Material                  11,700 $ 4.70 $ 54,990
G Conversion                     7,380 $ 5.40 $ 39,852
H = F + G Total Cost of Ending WIP $ 94,842
I = E + H Total Cost accounted for $ 616,090
J Rounding Off Differences $ 0
K = I + J Total cost to be accounted for [equals to computed in STEP 3] $ 616,090

Related Solutions

THE Company operates two departments, Department L and Department Q. THE Company uses a FIFO process...
THE Company operates two departments, Department L and Department Q. THE Company uses a FIFO process costing system. Department L reported the following inventory information for June: % complete % complete units DM conversion work in process, June 1 18,000 28% 67% work in process, June 30 34,000 71% 57% The cost of beginning work in process and the costs added during June in Department L were as follows: DM Conversion work in process, June 1 $ 35,240 $ 45,792...
THE Company operates two departments, Department L and Department Q. THE Company uses a FIFO process...
THE Company operates two departments, Department L and Department Q. THE Company uses a FIFO process costing system. Department L reported the following inventory information for June: % complete % complete units DM conversion work in process, June 1 18,000 28% 67% work in process, June 30 34,000 71% 57% The cost of beginning work in process and the costs added during June in Department L were as follows: DM Conversion work in process, June 1 $ 35,240 $ 45,792...
THE Company operates two departments, Department L and Department Q. THE Company uses a FIFO process...
THE Company operates two departments, Department L and Department Q. THE Company uses a FIFO process costing system. Department L reported the following inventory information for June: % complete % complete units DM conversion work in process, June 1 18,000 28% 67% work in process, June 30 34,000 71% 57% The cost of beginning work in process and the costs added during June in Department L were as follows: DM Conversion work in process, June 1 $ 35,240 $ 45,792...
THE Company operates two departments, Department L and Department Q. THE Company uses a FIFO process...
THE Company operates two departments, Department L and Department Q. THE Company uses a FIFO process costing system. Department L reported the following inventory information for June: % complete % complete units DM conversion work in process, June 1 14,000 24% 79% work in process, June 30 18,000 65% 41% The cost of beginning work in process and the costs added during June in Department L were as follows: DM Conversion work in process, June 1 $ 36,804 $ 24,660...
THE Company operates two departments, Department L and Department Q. THE Company uses a FIFO process...
THE Company operates two departments, Department L and Department Q. THE Company uses a FIFO process costing system. Department L reported the following inventory information for June: % complete % complete units DM conversion work in process, June 1 18,000 28% 67% work in process, June 30 34,000 71% 57% The cost of beginning work in process and the costs added during June in Department L were as follows: DM Conversion work in process, June 1 $ 35,240 $ 45,792...
THE Company operates two departments, Department L and Department Q. THE Company uses a FIFO process...
THE Company operates two departments, Department L and Department Q. THE Company uses a FIFO process costing system. Department L reported the following inventory information for June: % complete % complete units DM conversion work in process, June 1 18,000 28% 67% work in process, June 30 34,000 71% 57% The cost of beginning work in process and the costs added during June in Department L were as follows: DM Conversion work in process, June 1 $ 35,240 $ 45,792...
THE Company operates a single processing department and uses a FIFO process costing system. The equivalent...
THE Company operates a single processing department and uses a FIFO process costing system. The equivalent units for August were calculated as 88,620 for direct materials and 73,910 for conversion. THE Company's work in process at August 1 was: % complete % complete units DM conversion work in process, Aug. 1 36,000 55% 26% The cost of beginning work in process and the costs added during August were as follows: DM Conversion work in process, Aug. 1 $ 44,310 $...
THE Company operates a single processing department and uses a FIFO process costing system. The equivalent...
THE Company operates a single processing department and uses a FIFO process costing system. The equivalent units for August were calculated as 88,620 for direct materials and 73,910 for conversion. THE Company's work in process at August 1 was: % complete % complete units DM conversion work in process, Aug. 1 36,000 59% 25% The cost of beginning work in process and the costs added during August were as follows: DM Conversion work in process, Aug. 1 $ 44,310 $...
FIFO Method, Two-Department Analysis Muskoge Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product that...
FIFO Method, Two-Department Analysis Muskoge Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product that is processed in two departments: Molding and Assembly. In the Molding Department, direct materials are added at the beginning of the process; in the Assembly Department, additional direct materials are added at the end of the process. In both departments, conversion costs are incurred uniformly throughout the process. As work is completed, it is transferred out. The following table summarizes the production activity and...
FIFO Method, Two-Department Analysis Muskoge Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product that...
FIFO Method, Two-Department Analysis Muskoge Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product that is processed in two departments: Molding and Assembly. In the Molding Department, direct materials are added at the beginning of the process; in the Assembly Department, additional direct materials are added at the end of the process. In both departments, conversion costs are incurred uniformly throughout the process. As work is completed, it is transferred out. The following table summarizes the production activity and...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT