Question

What is your idea of a healthy community? Provide specific examples. What do healthy communities have in common? How would you provide care for a community if your idea of a healthy community does not match your community's definition of a healthy community?

Answer 1

What is your idea of a healthy community? Provide specific examples.

While nearby government strategies can assume advancing the wellbeing of networks, neighborhood government can't make more advantageous networks alone. It requires the joined exertion of everybody, including neighborhood organizations, volunteers, associations, schools, wellbeing specialists and wellbeing administrations to make a sound network.

Being physically dynamic is fundamental to great wellbeing. Empowering and giving chances to to take part in physical action are imperative components of a sound network. To me a solid network has the chance to acquire appropriate human services benefits, the chance to get a decent training, the chance to play, the chance to be social, the chance to be mentally fortified, the chance to be physically dynamic, and the chance to be protected while you exploit all these different openings. What's more, these open doors must be for everybody.

For huge numbers to take an interest is underestimated. We don't feel as though having experienced numerous boundaries to our own wellbeing interests. That is the place program organizers and network pioneers that, similar to ourself, may not be by and by acquainted with obstructions but rather have such a great amount to offer to the soundness of a network, must be instructed as far as making their chances accessible to everybody.

What do healthy communities have in common?

Lower smoking rates

More exercise

Lower rates of stoutness

More elevated amounts of create utilization

Less instances of diabetes

Lower circulatory strain and cholesterol

Less instances of sadness

How would you provide care for a community if your idea of a healthy community does not match your community's definition of a healthy community?

Mounting proof proposes physical and psychological wellness issues identify with the fabricated condition, including human changed places, for example, homes, schools, work environments, parks, mechanical regions, ranches, streets and roadways. The general wellbeing significance of the manufactured condition requires examination. Primer research exhibits the medical advantages of feasible networks. Notwithstanding, the effect of interceding and directing elements inside the fabricated condition on wellbeing must be investigated further. Given the unpredictability of the fabricated condition, understanding its impact on human wellbeing requires a network based, multilevel, interdisciplinary research approach.

Mounting proof proposes that there are social, wellbeing, and financial outcomes to confined and inactive ways of life. Tragically they develop of the urban condition advances detachment. Higher rates of TV seeing, expanded PC use, worry about wrongdoing, little contact with neighbors and geographic disengagement have made networks that are not interconnected. This disconnection may bring about an absence of interpersonal organizations and lessened social capital, which can add to corpulence, cardiovascular illness, psychological well-being issues, and expanded rates of mortality. Individuals who live in such separated networks are frequently unfit to impact changes or manage emergencies or general wellbeing challenges. Studies recommend that a decrease in youth and immature weight, for instance, through different mediation and anticipation programs, would yield long haul monetary advantages.

In examining the consequence of the assembled condition on general wellbeing, look into demonstrates that the weight of sickness is more prominent among minorities and lowincome networks. Lower financial status networks generally have constrained access to quality lodging stock and live in neighborhoods that don't encourage open air exercises or give numerous sound nourishment alternatives. Disparities in development and upkeep of lowincome lodging, particularly for Blacks, more established people, people with handicaps, and foreigners, have brought about deficient lodging, low quality lodging, stuffing, and more elevated amounts of populace thickness and wellbeing problems.16,36 Consequently, these networks may encounter more prominent rates of respiratory malady, formative issue, heftiness, unending diseases, and dysfunctional behavior.