Currently, taking pictures or any type of video recording in the United States Supreme Court is...

Currently, taking pictures or any type of video recording in the United States Supreme Court is not allowed. Discuss your thoughts and perspectives about allowing cameras in the United States Supreme Court during their hearings. What are the pros and cons about allowing cameras in the Court? Do you support putting cameras in the Court? Why or why not?

Expert Solution

It is a fact that digital media has become a huge part of our lives. People are constantly updated about current happenings, news and other events by looking at articles, pictures and videos on the internet. It helps them stay connected and up to date about everything that is happening around them.

However, the Supreme Court system in the United States prohibits people from taking pictures and videos inside the premises of the Court. Although people nowadays are so habituated to having access to pictures and videos of hot news and news in general, Supreme Court hearings are one of the very few events that the public cannot get a first hand view of. Whenever a sensational hearing is scheduled to take place, or a high profile case in involved, people's curiosity is at peaks to know the details, inside facts and the overall judgement.

In my opinion they expect to know all this information because they are used to being fed such details about other types news, for example - Road accidents, Celebrity updates etc. It is not new for a person these days to receive notifications about each and every event that is currently in the news - be it hard news or soft news. It becomes a topic of discussion and people like to stay updated about happenings like Supreme Court hearings due to various reasons such as personal interest, to make general conversations about it, to have an opinion about it etc. Therefore it is only the curiosity of people to feel like wanting to know the visual experience and the inside story of what happens during a Supreme Court hearing.

With regards to cameras being allowed inside the Supreme Court has clear disadvantages and advantages. Firstly, it is an extreme serious issue that is going on inside the premises and it is wrong to sensationalise news like that. There is always a risk of media distorting the news to gain public following. If the distorted news spreads, there will be a lot of rumour surrounding the issue, which in most cases is absolutely unnecessary and can be easily avoided. Therefore, for this reason it is not that big of an issue for the Supreme Court to not have cameras.

On the other hand, assuming that there is access for the public to stay updated On Supreme Court hearings, an advantage can be that people can get transparency of news given that they don't fall prey to the news channels and other people trying to sensationalise the news. Another advantage can be that genuinely interested people who like to follow what is happening will have a source to do so and it may help them in gaining perspective about the situation.

To conclude, there are pros and cons to allowing cameras inside Supreme Court. However, it is always better for a system like that to maintain their protocol and rules and not alter or break them just for public interest.

Hayet Jeridi answered 2 hours ago

United States v. Bailey United States Supreme Court 444 U.S. 394 (1980)

n Jacobson v. Massachusetts (1905), the United States Supreme Court upheld the right of states to...

n Jacobson v. Massachusetts (1905), the United States Supreme Court upheld the right of states to enact compulsory vaccination laws—one of the most challenging constitutional dimensions of public health. It also provided the terms for what would eventually become a core question of public health ethics. This case has become the precedent for many cases that have challenged vaccination laws. Both majority and dissenting opinions in numerous decisions have cited this case in reference to states’ authority to constrain individual...

In Dred Scott v. Stanford, the United States Supreme Court held that slaves were not entitled...

In Dred Scott v. Stanford, the United States Supreme Court held that slaves were not entitled to file suit in federal courts because they were not citizens. Select one: True False

Under its power of judicial review, the United States Supreme Court may declare which of the...

Under its power of judicial review, the United States Supreme Court may declare which of the following unconstitutional?: A lower court decision. An action by the executive branch of government. A law passed by a legislative body. All of the above.

Can Employers legally eliminate birth control from healthcare coverage? The Supreme Court of the United States...

Can Employers legally eliminate birth control from healthcare coverage? The Supreme Court of the United States is taking up this issue this session, and it will be among the first-ever cases heard remotely due to the current pandemic. What is the issue presented to the Supreme Court in this matter? What rule will the court need to apply to decide it? What are the best arguments of each side? Which do you find most persuasive, and why? Do you expect...

View this article/video about a 2015 Supreme Court decision against a major clothing brand and retailer....

View this article/video about a 2015 Supreme Court decision against a major clothing brand and retailer. SCOTUS Rules in Favor of Muslim Woman in Suit Against Abercrombie and Fitch As a manager, how would you maintain consistent standards, while also accommodating religious differences?

AMERICAN GOVERNMENT Currently, the Supreme Court does not allow cameras in their courtroom. They do release...

AMERICAN GOVERNMENT Currently, the Supreme Court does not allow cameras in their courtroom. They do release audio of oral arguments, as well as printed transcripts, and all court proceedings are open to the public. Should the Supreme Court add cameras into the courtroom? Do you think Supreme Court justices should have term limits? Currently, they are appointed for life. Do you have a favorite Supreme Court case? If so, why?

Dear Supreme Court, I am in prison. I was convicted of high treason against the United...

Dear Supreme Court, I am in prison. I was convicted of high treason against the United States for transmitting documents to WikiLeaks that prove the National Security Agency was tracking and reading all of my email, because I once commented to a friend that somebody should really build a big bomb and blow up the NSA Headquarters in Fort Meade, Maryland. It was clearly not a serious suggestion, but an expression of irritation. If they can spy on me, without...

In June 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that states can force large online retailers to...

In June 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that states can force large online retailers to collect sales tax from customers, even if the retailer does not have a physical presence in that state. Do you think sales tax should be collected on Internet purchases? Why or why not? What are the positive and negative implications of collecting sales tax on Internet purchases?

Supreme Court justices are elected for “life” and some states follow the same procedure. How should...

Supreme Court justices are elected for “life” and some states follow the same procedure. How should judges be selected? What are the advantages and disadvantages of the federal appointment process? What are the pros and cons of judges being elected by the people? What are the benefits of the mixture of both selection processes? Doesn’t the process of appointing judges rather than electing them allow judges to do what is right instead of what is popular? Would the outcome of...

Question