In Dred Scott v. Stanford, the United States Supreme Court held that slaves were not entitled...

In Dred Scott v. Stanford, the United States Supreme Court held that slaves were not entitled to file suit in federal courts because they were not citizens.

Select one:

True

False

Expert Solution

The given statement is true because the supreme court actually II ruled that the African Americans don't have the right to file petitions because they are actually not the citizens on the whole and that is the reason

(A) true is the answer to this question

Rahul Sunny answered 2 years ago

United States v. Bailey United States Supreme Court 444 U.S. 394 (1980)

n Jacobson v. Massachusetts (1905), the United States Supreme Court upheld the right of states to...

n Jacobson v. Massachusetts (1905), the United States Supreme Court upheld the right of states to enact compulsory vaccination laws—one of the most challenging constitutional dimensions of public health. It also provided the terms for what would eventually become a core question of public health ethics. This case has become the precedent for many cases that have challenged vaccination laws. Both majority and dissenting opinions in numerous decisions have cited this case in reference to states’ authority to constrain individual...

brief the court decision entitled United States v. Hamilton, 4th Ct. App. 2012

brief the court decision entitled United States v. Hamilton, __4th Ct. App. __ 2012

In University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. Nassar case, the Supreme Court held that the...

In University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. Nassar case, the Supreme Court held that the "___________" standard would apply in retaliation cases.

Based on Court Case United States v. Bestfoods 113F.3d 572 (1998) United States v. Bestfoods 113...

Based on Court Case United States v. Bestfoods 113F.3d 572 (1998) United States v. Bestfoods 113 F.3d 572 (1998) SOUTER, JUSTICE The United States brought this action under §107(a)(2) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) against, among others, respondent CPC International, Inc., the parent corporation of the defunct Ott Chemical Co. (Ott II), for the costs of cleaning up industrial waste generated by Ott II’s chemical plant. Section 107(a)(2) authorizes suits against, among others,...

Under its power of judicial review, the United States Supreme Court may declare which of the...

Under its power of judicial review, the United States Supreme Court may declare which of the following unconstitutional?: A lower court decision. An action by the executive branch of government. A law passed by a legislative body. All of the above.

brief case of united states v. liebo, united states court of appeals, eight circuit, 1991,923 F.2d...

brief case of united states v. liebo, united states court of appeals, eight circuit, 1991,923 F.2d 1308

Can Employers legally eliminate birth control from healthcare coverage? The Supreme Court of the United States...

Can Employers legally eliminate birth control from healthcare coverage? The Supreme Court of the United States is taking up this issue this session, and it will be among the first-ever cases heard remotely due to the current pandemic. What is the issue presented to the Supreme Court in this matter? What rule will the court need to apply to decide it? What are the best arguments of each side? Which do you find most persuasive, and why? Do you expect...

Please read the article, Money Unlimited, regarding the U.S. Supreme Court case, Citizens United v. Federal...

Please read the article, Money Unlimited, regarding the U.S. Supreme Court case, Citizens United v. Federal Elections Committee. Please write a short paragraph on your impressions of the case by March 1, 2019. Money Unlimited How Chief Justice John Roberts orchestrated the Citizens United decision. By Jeffrey Toobin (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. By having the case reargued, Roberts put the liberals in a box and transformed the decision’s impact on political campaigns. Illustration by Barry...

Review the LawNow article entitled: "The Supreme Court of Canada Protects the LITTLE GUY" by Barbara...

Review the LawNow article entitled: "The Supreme Court of Canada Protects the LITTLE GUY" by Barbara Billingsley. According to that article, what was the decision of the Supreme Court in Churchland v. Gore Mutual Insurance Co., 2003 ? Select one: a. The Court found that the action was brought in the wrong jurisdiction; accordingly the action was barred. b. The claim was barred by the limitation period set out in the fire insurance section of the British Columbia Insurance Act,...

Question