Question

In: Economics

Dear Supreme Court, I am in prison. I was convicted of high treason against the United...

Dear Supreme Court,

I am in prison. I was convicted of high treason against the United States for transmitting documents to WikiLeaks that prove the National Security Agency was tracking and reading all of my email, because I once commented to a friend that somebody should really build a big bomb and blow up the NSA Headquarters in Fort Meade, Maryland. It was clearly not a serious suggestion, but an expression of irritation. If they can spy on me, without a warrant or even probable cause, then why can I not do the same? They are a public agency, paid for by tax dollars, and the American People have a right to know what they are doing. I argue that my conviction is a direct violation of my First Amendment right to free speech, and the spirit of my First Amendment right to peaceably assemble, as the crux of this conviction was my communication of this evidence with both specific individuals, and the public in general. Please agree to hear my case. The truth will set me free!

Should writ of certiorari be granted?

Solutions

Expert Solution

Yes, of course the the writ of Certiorari would be definitely granted, because he only commented to his/her friend that somebody should really build a bomb and blow up the NSA Headquarters in fort Meade. He was not quiet sure about the fact whether the bomb is really made or not. Moreover it is not proved that he was involved in this act if this incident could be happen in reality. He may be listen this from anybody randomly. Certiorari futher says if they can spy him why he has not right to sy them. Of course its its duty of every citizen to protect his nation from each and every way..it is one of the fundamental duty of every citizen to watch wether the citizens are performing their duties or not but there are condititions, if Certiorari wants to spy them he must use the legal way for his act. The way he begave is ileegal the court will punish him for this act or impose fine on him. Every American has right to act against those who will not perform their duties or fundamental duties according to US Constitution, either it will be government employee or layman of nation.Certiorari has right to free speech and he has aright to peaceably assemble, to express himself, as he actually wants to see whether the employees are performing their dutes or not and he does not want to harm the public in any way. The supreme court will definitely hear to his case and his writ would be granted.

Hope you got your answer if you need some more information about your question feel free to ask...thank you


Related Solutions

United States v. Bailey United States Supreme Court 444 U.S. 394 (1980)
United States v. Bailey United States Supreme Court 444 U.S. 394 (1980)
ou are a Justice of the NSW Supreme Court. How will the High Court’s decision in...
ou are a Justice of the NSW Supreme Court. How will the High Court’s decision in Ermogenous v Greek Orthodox Community affect your future decisions regarding intention and the presumptions regarding social/domestic and commercial agreements?
View this article/video about a 2015 Supreme Court decision against a major clothing brand and retailer....
View this article/video about a 2015 Supreme Court decision against a major clothing brand and retailer.           SCOTUS Rules in Favor of Muslim Woman in Suit Against Abercrombie and Fitch As a manager, how would you maintain consistent standards, while also accommodating religious differences?
In Dred Scott v. Stanford, the United States Supreme Court held that slaves were not entitled...
In Dred Scott v. Stanford, the United States Supreme Court held that slaves were not entitled to file suit in federal courts because they were not citizens. Select one: True False
Under its power of judicial review, the United States Supreme Court may declare which of the...
Under its power of judicial review, the United States Supreme Court may declare which of the following unconstitutional?: A lower court decision. An action by the executive branch of government. A law passed by a legislative body. All of the above.
n Jacobson v. Massachusetts (1905), the United States Supreme Court upheld the right of states to...
n Jacobson v. Massachusetts (1905), the United States Supreme Court upheld the right of states to enact compulsory vaccination laws—one of the most challenging constitutional dimensions of public health. It also provided the terms for what would eventually become a core question of public health ethics. This case has become the precedent for many cases that have challenged vaccination laws. Both majority and dissenting opinions in numerous decisions have cited this case in reference to states’ authority to constrain individual...
Can Employers legally eliminate birth control from healthcare coverage? The Supreme Court of the United States...
Can Employers legally eliminate birth control from healthcare coverage? The Supreme Court of the United States is taking up this issue this session, and it will be among the first-ever cases heard remotely due to the current pandemic.   What is the issue presented to the Supreme Court in this matter? What rule will the court need to apply to decide it? What are the best arguments of each side? Which do you find most persuasive, and why? Do you expect...
Please read the article, Money Unlimited, regarding the U.S. Supreme Court case, Citizens United v. Federal...
Please read the article, Money Unlimited, regarding the U.S. Supreme Court case, Citizens United v. Federal Elections Committee. Please write a short paragraph on your impressions of the case by March 1, 2019. Money Unlimited How Chief Justice John Roberts orchestrated the Citizens United decision. By Jeffrey Toobin (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. By having the case reargued, Roberts put the liberals in a box and transformed the decision’s impact on political campaigns. Illustration by Barry...
In re Bass Supreme Court of North Carolina, 738 S.E.2d 173 (2013). I need a little...
In re Bass Supreme Court of North Carolina, 738 S.E.2d 173 (2013). I need a little help getting started in the right direction
Topic: "Discrimination against women and minorities in the labor market". I am looking for the economic...
Topic: "Discrimination against women and minorities in the labor market". I am looking for the economic impact of this issue on the labor market and the economy. The paper needs to be 6-8 pages.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT