AMERICAN GOVERNMENT Currently, the Supreme Court does not allow cameras in their courtroom. They do release...

AMERICAN GOVERNMENT

Currently, the Supreme Court does not allow cameras in their courtroom. They do release audio of oral arguments, as well as printed transcripts, and all court proceedings are open to the public. Should the Supreme Court add cameras into the courtroom?

Do you think Supreme Court justices should have term limits? Currently, they are appointed for life.

Do you have a favorite Supreme Court case? If so, why?

Expert Solution

Answer. Supreme courty should allow camera's in the supreme court and release those videos for educational and informational purposes . This will help those law students very much who sometimes are unable to visit the courtroom and learn the ways to create arguments and for full transperency to the public. Sometimes many of the audiences and defendents or suspects think that the judge is biased and he or she is giving a biased judgement in the courtroom if there are video evidences available the defendents can use them in a better way to review the case and to see if the judgement was biased or not and can appeal again if they feel so and maybe the faith people have lost on the judicial system will be restored with this process.

Answer. Long terms should have led to bribe issues and political confirmation process and the court goes out of the touch of people . There should be term limits or some fluctuations in the environments where the judges work . When a judge is placed on a particular place for a long time he or she gets known in that place and he or she has some political relations over there after some time which in return helps the political leaders to escape from charges. I m not American so i can't tell you about the cases i don't follow them .

If you need any further information let me know and i will edit the answer ASAP . please leave a upvote . thanks :)

Rahul Sunny answered 2 years ago

Analyse the Supreme Court’s rulings in the Gratz and Grutter cases. Why does the court allow...

Analyse the Supreme Court’s rulings in the Gratz and Grutter cases. Why does the court allow race to be used in one case anc not the other? how is the court using Scrutiny?

In what ways was the U.S Supreme Court a party to the repression of African American...

In what ways was the U.S Supreme Court a party to the repression of African American lives and politics in the 1870s, 80s, and 90s? 400 words

How did the Supreme Court use judicial review to change American society?

explain how to understand what the Supreme Court does and how to understand the cases it...

explain how to understand what the Supreme Court does and how to understand the cases it hears in America. Please be comprehensive about the whole process.

Do you agree with the supreme court that the Anti-Terrorism Act of 1996 was a violation...

Do you agree with the supreme court that the Anti-Terrorism Act of 1996 was a violation of constitutional rights? Why or why not?

how do the Supreme Court holdings in Gitlow and Palko establish the need for incorporation?

Do you think the Supreme Court is a de facto law maker, and do you think...

Do you think the Supreme Court is a de facto law maker, and do you think there is a difference between the role of the Judiciary set forth in the Constitution and that stated in Marbury v. Madison? Are the Constitution and Marbury consistent with each other?

What does the Olmstead Supreme Court Decision say about segregation of people with disabilities?

Looking at the amendments and Supreme Court decisions, how close does the Constitution come to meeting...

Looking at the amendments and Supreme Court decisions, how close does the Constitution come to meeting the benchmarks today? Examine each benchmark and three examples of each. Has the Constitution become a more democratic? What work needs to be done to meet these benchmarks?

Do you agree with the argument of the appellate buyer or the argument of the state supreme court? Why?

A seller agreed to give a buyer the first right to purchase the remainder of her property if she chose to sell it. When the seller died, the buyer filed suit against the estate, seeking the option to purchase. The two parties entered into a settlement agreement that was disapproved by the probate court. After the probate court's disapproval, the parties continued to attempt to negotiate a sale. They then entered into a second settlement agreement that was never signed....

Question