United States v. Bailey United States Supreme Court 444 U.S. 394 (1980)

United States v. Bailey

United States Supreme Court
444 U.S. 394 (1980)

Solutions

Expert Solution

Issue: in a case of involving escape from federal custody did the district court err by disallowing consideration of defendants asserted defence of evidence of druess and necessity which was in the form of of various conditions and events at the federal jail ? Conclusion: according to the supreme court of the United States the trival court was correct in demanding that respondent prisioners show some evidence that they attempted to Surender or engaged in equivalent conduct once they had freed themselves from the conditions they described .when respondents failed to provide such evidence the trial court correctly ruled that respondents had failed as a matter of law to present evidence sufficient to support the defences of necessity or duress because they had not turned themselves in after they had escaped the allegedly coercive conditions .the court reversed the judgement of the court of appeals

ekkarill92 answered 1 year ago

Next > < Previous

Related Solutions

In Dred Scott v. Stanford, the United States Supreme Court held that slaves were not entitled...

In Dred Scott v. Stanford, the United States Supreme Court held that slaves were not entitled to file suit in federal courts because they were not citizens. Select one: True False

Please read the article, Money Unlimited, regarding the U.S. Supreme Court case, Citizens United v. Federal...

Please read the article, Money Unlimited, regarding the U.S. Supreme Court case, Citizens United v. Federal Elections Committee. Please write a short paragraph on your impressions of the case by March 1, 2019. Money Unlimited How Chief Justice John Roberts orchestrated the Citizens United decision. By Jeffrey Toobin (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. By having the case reargued, Roberts put the liberals in a box and transformed the decision’s impact on political campaigns. Illustration by Barry...

In Griswold v. Connecticut, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that “specific guarantees in the Bill of...

In Griswold v. Connecticut, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that “specific guarantees in the Bill of Rights have penumbras, formed by emanations from those guarantees that help give them life and substance.” 1. Discuss the meaning and implications of Griswold’s penumbras and emanations 2. Describe the legal basis for an unenumerated right that might be located within these purported constitutional regions.

In Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005), the U.S. Supreme Court decided...

In Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005), the U.S. Supreme Court decided a case in which landowners challenged the power of a city in Connecticut to take their property for redevelopment. The redevelopment plan did not contemplate that all of the land would be open to the public. Parts would be privately developed. The plaintiffs alleged that the taking was unconstitutional because it was not for a public purpose. The Supreme Court rejected this claim. Use...

14 ) In U.S. Term Limits v Thornton, the Supreme Court ruled that the age, residency,...

14 ) In U.S. Term Limits v Thornton, the Supreme Court ruled that the age, residency, and citizenship requirements set forth in the Constitution were a complete statement of Congressional eligibility standards and that the only way to add any eligibility requirements would be through a constitutional amendment. True or False 15) Each state is given a number of Electoral College votes equal to its combined number of seats in the U.S. House of Representatives and the Senate. True or...

Based on Court Case United States v. Bestfoods 113F.3d 572 (1998) United States v. Bestfoods 113...

Based on Court Case United States v. Bestfoods 113F.3d 572 (1998) United States v. Bestfoods 113 F.3d 572 (1998) SOUTER, JUSTICE The United States brought this action under §107(a)(2) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) against, among others, respondent CPC International, Inc., the parent corporation of the defunct Ott Chemical Co. (Ott II), for the costs of cleaning up industrial waste generated by Ott II’s chemical plant. Section 107(a)(2) authorizes suits against, among others,...

Under its power of judicial review, the United States Supreme Court may declare which of the...

Under its power of judicial review, the United States Supreme Court may declare which of the following unconstitutional?: A lower court decision. An action by the executive branch of government. A law passed by a legislative body. All of the above.

In June 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that states can force large online retailers to...

In June 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that states can force large online retailers to collect sales tax from customers, even if the retailer does not have a physical presence in that state. Do you think sales tax should be collected on Internet purchases? Why or why not? What are the positive and negative implications of collecting sales tax on Internet purchases?

brief case of united states v. liebo, united states court of appeals, eight circuit, 1991,923 F.2d...

brief case of united states v. liebo, united states court of appeals, eight circuit, 1991,923 F.2d 1308

CASE: HAROLD DAVIS and ENID DAVIS, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee UNITED STATES COURT...

CASE: HAROLD DAVIS and ENID DAVIS, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT 861 F.2d 558 November 14, 1988 Plaintiff-appellants Harold and Enid Davis claimed charitable deductions under IRC section 170 for funds they sent to their two sons for their support while they served as full-time unpaid missionaries for the Church of Jesus Christ of LatterDay-Saints at the New York City Mission and at the New Zealand/Cook Islands Mission. These...

Subjects