Question

please write two paragraph for each question

1)Give examples of where acting on observational epidemiological evidence has benefited public health and where it has harmed public health.

2) Explain how you would go about assessing whether an intervention is generalizable from one context to another

Answer 1

Answer:-01 Epidemiology is that the study of disease in populations. Veterinarians et al. involved within the drugs and public health professions use epidemiological methods for disease surveillance, outbreak investigation, and observational studies to identify risk factors of zoonosis in both human and animal populations.
Knowledge of these risk factors is used to direct further research investigation and to implement disease control measures. the use of hazard analysis critical control point (HACCP) systems depends greatly on information produced by epidemiological studies.
Epidemiological methods are used for disease surveillance to idwhich problems  are the important.
Epidemiological studies also used to identify risk factors which may represent critical control points within the food production system.
Answer:-02
Epidemiologydefines generalizability as “unbiased inferences regarding a target population (beyond the themes within the study).” A goal of public health research is to use study findings to an external population, and thus the facility to effectively evaluate ...
Generalizability is portrayed by the importance of an examination's outcomes when applied to a much bigger populace. The Word reference of The study of disease transmission (J.M. Last et al., fourth ed., 2001) characterizes generalizability as "fair inductions with reference to an objective populace (past the themes within the investigation)."
An objective of general wellbeing research is to use study discoveries to an outer populace, and therefore the capacity to viably assess generalizability is urgent to the present present reality use of results. Current depictions of generalizability neglect to satisfactorily aid this assessment; thusly, an option theoretical system is proposed.
can be surveyed utilizing seven key determinants that provides a more deliberate assessment of this concept than are often refined by utilizing broadly known definitions.
Results
Generalizability as a develop in course books is examined, a bit like the arrangement of our determinants hooked in to these builds. The seven key determinants are:
(I) populace definition,
(ii) meaning of result,
(iii) enrollment of subjects,
(iv) incorporation and avoidance standards
, (v) information assortment,
(vi) subject maintenance, and
(vii) length of development.
The fundamental examination plans within the study of disease transmission (ecologic, case–control, companion, and randomized clinical preliminary) are utilized to point out the utilization of the determinants. Moreover, cardiovascular breakdown examines utilizing each quite epidemiologic investigation configuration are audited for utilization of the determinants. Concerns with reference to the generalizability of the outcomes from all investigations are examined inside and out, utilizing the seven key determinants. Qualities and constraints of the generalizability of the discoveries from these examinations are analyzed in synopsis tables.
End
Generalizability normally relates just to the surface legitimacy of an examination, yet the key determinants incorporate components of inner legitimacy. This extra data loans solidarity to the capacity to assess an examination's outcomes. here and now and end of the day answers for getting and introducing generalizable data on cardiovascular breakdown patients are introduced. These arrangements are often utilized to furnish clinicians and disease transmission specialists with more delegate data on cardiovascular breakdown populaces. This survey can fill in as a model for the conversation of the determinants of generalizability in other ongoing illness examines.