In: Operations Management
Company chosen: Microsoft Corporation
1. What the company is doing in that
area?
Microsoft Corporation, leading developer of
personal-computer software systems and applications. The company
also publishes books and multimedia titles, produces its own line
of hybrid tablet computers, offers e-mail services, and sells
electronic game systems, computer peripherals (input/output
devices), and portable media players. It has sales offices
throughout the world. In addition to its main research and
development centre at its corporate headquarters in Redmond,
Washington, U.S., Microsoft operates research labs in Cambridge,
England (1997); Beijing, China (1998); Sadashivnagar, Bangalore,
India (2005); Santa Barbara, California (2005); Cambridge,
Massachusetts (2008); New York, New York (2012); and Montreal,
Canada (2015).
1975 | Microsoft founded |
Jan. 1, 1979 | Microsoft moves from Albuquerque, New Mexico to Bellevue, Washington |
June 25, 1981 | Microsoft incorporates |
Aug. 12, 1981 | IBM introduces its personal computer with Microsoft’s 16-bit operating system, MS-DOS 1.0 |
Feb. 26, 1986 | Microsoft moves to corporate campus in Redmond, Washington |
March 13, 1986 | Microsoft stock goes public |
Aug. 1, 1989 | Microsoft introduces earliest version of Office suite of productivity applications |
May 22, 1990 | Microsoft launches Windows 3.0 |
Aug. 24, 1995 | Microsoft launches Windows 95 |
Dec. 7, 1995 | Bill Gates outlines Microsoft’s commitment to supporting and enhancing the Internet |
June 25, 1998 | Microsoft launches Windows 98 |
Jan. 13, 2000 | Steve Ballmer named president and chief executive officer for Microsoft |
Feb. 17, 2000 | Microsoft launches Windows 2000 |
June 22, 2000 | Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer outline Microsoft’s .NET strategy for Web services |
May 31, 2001 | Microsoft launches Office XP |
Oct. 25, 2001 | Microsoft launches Windows XP |
Nov. 15, 2001 | Microsoft launches Xbox |
Jan. 15, 2002 | Bill Gates outlines Microsoft’s commitment to Trustworthy Computing |
April 24, 2003 | Microsoft launches Windows Server 2003 |
Oct. 21, 2003 | Microsoft launches Microsoft Office System |
July 20, 2004 | Microsoft announces plans to return up to $75 billion to shareholders in dividends and stock buybacks |
Nov. 22, 2005 | Microsoft launches Xbox 360 |
July 20, 2006 | Microsoft announces a new US$20 billion tender offer and authorizes an additional share-repurchase program of up to $20 billion over five years |
Jan. 30, 2007 | Microsoft launches Windows Vista and the 2007 Microsoft Office System to consumers worldwide |
Feb. 27, 2008 | Microsoft launches Windows Server 2008, SQL Server 2008 and Visual Studio 2008 |
June 27, 2008 | Bill Gates transitions from his day-to-day role at Microsoft to spend more time on his work at The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation |
June 3, 2009 | Microsoft launches Bing decision engine |
Oct. 22, 2009 | Microsoft launches Windows 7; opens first physical store in Scottsdale, Arizona |
June 15, 2010 | Microsoft launches general availability of Office 2010 |
Nov. 10, 2010 | Microsoft launches Windows Phone 7 |
Nov. 17, 2010 | Microsoft announces availability of Microsoft Lync |
June 28, 2011 | Microsoft launches Office 365 |
Oct. 13, 2011 | Microsoft closes its acquisition of Skype |
June 25, 2012 | Microsoft acquires Yammer |
Sept. 4, 2012 | Microsoft launches Windows Server 2012 |
Sept. 12, 2012 | Microsoft launches Visual Studio 2012 |
Oct. 18, 2012 | Microsoft employee giving tops US$1 billion |
Oct. 23, 2012 | Microsoft introduces new entertainment experience from Xbox |
Oct. 26, 2012 | Microsoft launches Windows 8 and Microsoft Surface |
Jan. 29, 2013 | Microsoft launches Office 2013, expands Office 365 |
Feb. 18, 2013 | Microsoft launches Outlook.com |
May 21, 2013 | Microsoft unveils Xbox One |
July 11, 2013 | “Microsoft One” reorganization realigns company to enable innovation at great speed, efficiency |
Sept. 3, 2013 | Microsoft announces decision to acquire Nokia’s devices and services business, license Nokia’s patents and mapping services |
Oct. 17, 2013 | Microsoft launches Windows 8.1 |
Oct. 22, 2013 | Microsoft launches Surface 2 and Surface Pro 2 |
Nov. 22, 2013 | Microsoft launches Xbox One |
Feb. 4, 2014 | Satya Nadella named chief executive officer for Microsoft |
March 27, 2014 | Microsoft launches Office for iPad |
April 25, 2014 | Microsoft completes acquisition of Nokia Devices and Services business |
June 20, 2014 | Microsoft launches Surface Pro 3 |
Sept. 15, 2014 | Minecraft to join Microsoft announcement |
Nov. 6, 2014 | Microsoft announces Office apps for Android tablets |
May 5, 2015 | Microsoft releases Surface 3 |
July 29, 2015 | Microsoft launches Windows 10 |
Sept. 22, 2015 | Microsoft launches Office 2016 |
Oct. 6, 2015 | Microsoft announces Surface Book, Surface Pro 4, Microsoft Band 2, Lumia 950 and Lumia 95 XL |
Oct. 26, 2015 | Microsoft opens flagship store in New York City |
Nov. 12, 2015 | Microsoft opens flagship store in Sydney, Australia |
Jan. 19, 2016 | Microsoft Philanthropies announces $1B in donations putting Microsoft Cloud to work for the public good |
June 1, 2016 | Microsoft launches SQL Server 2016 |
July 6, 2016 | Microsoft introduces Microsoft Dynamics 365 |
Sept. 29, 2016 | Microsoft announces formation of new AI and Research Group |
Oct. 18, 2016 | Microsoft researchers achieve human parity in conversational speech recognition |
Oct. 26, 2016 | Microsoft introduces Surface Studio, Surface Dial, new Surface Book and Windows 10 Creators Update |
Dec. 8, 2016 | Microsoft completes acquisition of LinkedIn |
March 7, 2017 | Microsoft releases Visual Studio 2017 |
March 17, 2017 | Microsoft Teams rolls out to Office 365 customers worldwide |
May 2, 2017 | Microsoft introduces new technology for education, including Windows 10 S, new Surface Laptop and Microsoft Teams for classrooms |
May 23, 2017 | Microsoft announces Windows 10 China Government Edition and the new Surface Pro |
June 14, 2017 | Surface Laptop and new Surface Pro available in 25 markets worldwide |
Sept. 21, 2017 | Microsoft, Facebook and Telxius complete “Marea,” the highest-capacity subsea cable to cross the Atlantic Ocean |
Oct. 17, 2017 | Windows 10 Fall Creators Update and Mixed Reality Headsets become available; Surface Book 2 announced |
Nov. 6, 2017 | Microsoft launches Xbox One X |
Nov. 28, 2017 | Microsoft announces major Redmond campus renovation |
Dec. 5, 2017 | Microsoft breaks ground on new sustainable Silicon Valley campus |
Feb. 22, 2018 | Microsoft opens new campus in Dublin, Ireland |
May 15, 2018 | Microsoft announces Surface Hub 2 |
May 16, 2018 | Microsoft unveils Xbox Adaptive Controller |
Aug. 2, 2018 | Surface Go becomes available |
Oct. 26, 2018 | Microsoft completes GitHub acquisition |
Jan. 16, 2019 | Microsoft announces $500 million commitment to advance affordable housing in Puget Sound region |
Feb. 24, 2019 | Microsoft introduces HoloLens 2 |
July 11, 2019 | Microsoft opens flagship store in London |
Oct. 2, 2019 | Microsoft announces five Surface products for late 2019, plus two new dual-screen devices, Surface Neo and Surface Duo, coming in late 2020 |
Dec. 12, 2019 | Microsoft announces Xbox Series X, coming in late 2020 |
This is the list of important things done by microsoft.
2. How and why the technology is
disruptive?
What Is Disruptive Technology?
Disruptive technology is an innovation that significantly alters the way that consumers, industries, or businesses operate. A disruptive technology sweeps away the systems or habits it replaces because it has attributes that are recognizably superior.
Recent disruptive technology examples include e-commerce, online news sites, ride-sharing apps, and GPS systems.
In their own times, the automobile, electricity service, and television were disruptive technologies.
Market Disruption Definition
Disruptive Technology Explained
Clayton Christensen popularized the idea of disruptive technologies in The Innovator's Dilemma, published in 1997. It has since become a buzzword in startup businesses that seek to create a product with mass appeal.
Even a startup with limited resources can aim at technology disruption by inventing an entirely new way of getting something done. Established companies tend to focus on what they do best and pursue incremental improvements rather than revolutionary changes. They cater to their largest and most demanding customers.
This provides an opening for disruptive businesses to target overlooked customer segments and gain an industry presence. Established companies often lack the flexibility to adapt quickly to new threats. That allows disruptors to move upstream over time and cannibalize more customer segments.
Disruptive technologies are difficult to prepare for because they can appear suddenly.
The Potential of Disruptive Technology
Risk-taking companies may recognize the potential of disruptive technology in their own operations and target new markets that can incorporate it into their business processes. These are the "innovators" of the technology adoption lifecycle. Other companies may take a more risk-averse position and adopt an innovation only after seeing how it performs for others.
Companies that fail to account for the effects of disruptive technology may find themselves losing market share to competitors that have discovered ways to integrate the technology.
Blockchain as an Example of Disruptive Technology
Blockchain, the technology behind Bitcoin, is a decentralized distributed ledger that records transactions between two parties. It moves transactions from a centralized server-based system to a transparent cryptographic network. The technology uses peer-to-peer consensus to record and verify transactions, removing the need for manual verification.
The automobile, electricity service, and television all were disruptive technologies in their own times.
Blockchain technology has enormous implications for financial institutions such as banks and stock brokerages. For example, a brokerage firm could execute peer-to-peer trade confirmations on the blockchain, removing the need for custodians and clearinghouses, which will reduce financial intermediary costs and dramatically expedite transaction times.
Investing in Disruptive Technology
Investing in companies that create or adopt disruptive technologies carries significant risk. Many products considered disruptive take years to be adopted by consumers or businesses, or are not adopted at all. The Segway electric vehicle was once touted as a disruptive technology until it wasn't.
Investors can gain exposure to disruptive technology by investing in exchange-traded funds (ETFs) such as the ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF (DTEC). This fund invests in a variety of innovative areas such as the internet of things, cloud computing, fintech, robotics, and artificial intelligence.
3. What technologies did it replace or improve
upon
Software as a Service
The name of Microsoft’s “Business Division” may sound unhelpfully generic, but it refers to the part of the operations that’s responsible for creating the stupendously profitable Office. The suite started as an adjunct, a method for showcasing Microsoft’s revolutionary operating system. But since Office’s 1990 debut, the applications that comprise it have become just about mandatory for anyone wanting to conduct business. Over a billion people now use Office, to the point where Word and Excel are practically synonymous with word processing and spreadsheets, respectively. Multiply that user base by $140 per license for the stripped-down Home & Student version of Office, a product whose marginal cost is close to zero, and it’s easy to see why Microsoft does everything in its power to maintain Office’s profitability (and why competitors from OpenOffice to Google Docs want nothing more than to chip away at Office’s 90% market share.)
The Business Division’s only serious competitor for dominance at Microsoft is the company’s Windows Division, whose latest contribution to the marketplace is Windows 8. Coincidentally, Windows’ share of the worldwide operating system market is as large as Office’s share of productivity suites is – right around 90%. Almost half of those users use Windows 7, and about a third are one generation behind at Windows XP. Windows 8 retails for $120, with marginal costs comparable to if not considerably less than those for Office.
The Bottom Line
All-in-one entertainment systems (Xbox One) and free audio- and video-conferencing around the world (Skype) may be exciting, the kind of things that make life in the 21st century more enjoyable, but their impact on Microsoft’s income are minimal. Instead, the company’s secret to staggering riches lies in the daily business of allowing users to create and manipulate documents; and providing the software that performs a computer’s most important function – permitting data to make it from your computer’s hardware components to its display. It isn’t alluring, but it pays the bills ... to an extent few companies in history can match.
4. What is the competition it faces (company/technology)
Microsoft's Competitors
Microsoft Corporation’s (MSFT) primary competitors include some of the most prominent technology companies in the industry. The list includes well-known brands such as Apple (AAPL), Google (GOOG), SAP, IBM (IBM) and Oracle (ORCL), among others. Because Microsoft is a diversified corporation that offers many types of products and services, the company faces stiff competition in several key areas of the technology sector.1
Microsoft's Core Focus
Microsoft got its start by focusing on software, and although the company has branched out into other areas, it still has a strong emphasis in this field. Some of the most successful software corporations in the world, such as Oracle and the German firm SAP, compete directly with Microsoft for the lucrative business services market.23
The Windows operating system is perhaps the best-known Microsoft product. Though Windows dominates the OS field, the company competes with a number of smaller firms, such as Red Hat, that distribute open-sources operating systems such as Linux.145
Other Microsoft Products
Microsoft is also an important player in the hardware field. Its products includes tablets designed to compete with similar devices made by other companies, such as Apple. The company makes a variety of computer accessories as well, which brings it in direct competition with several firms that specialize in this area, such as Logitech.1
Microsoft is also a major force in online search with its Bing search engine. The main rival company here is Google, along with various other firms with smaller engines.6
Microsoft faces competitive pressures in all areas of its
operations. The pressure comes from a diverse mix of technology
companies, both large and small.
Microsoft's Comment on Competitors and Industry Peers
The Windows operating system faces competition from various software products and from alternative platforms and devices, mainly from Apple and Google. We believe Windows competes effectively by giving customers choice, value, flexibility, security, an easy-to-use interface, compatibility with a broad range of hardware and software applications, including those that enable productivity, and the largest support network for any operating system.
Competitors to the versions of Office included in D&C
Licensing include global application vendors such as Apple and
Google, numerous web-based competitors, and local application
developers in Asia and Europe. Apple distributes versions of its
pre-installed application software, such as email, note taking, and
calendar products, through its PCs, tablets, and phones. Google
provides a hosted messaging and productivity suite and distributes
its productivity services through the Android and Chrome operating
systems. Web-based offerings competing with individual applications
can also position themselves as alternatives to our products. We
believe our products compete effectively based on our strategy of
providing powerful, flexible, secure, and easy to use solutions
that work across a variety of devices.
Windows Phone operating system faces competition from iOS, Android,
and Blackberry operating systems. Windows Phone competes based on
differentiated user interface, personalized applications,
compatibility with Windows PCs and tablets, and other unique
capabilities.
Our Xbox Platform competes with console platforms from Sony and
Nintendo, both of which have a large, established base of
customers. The lifecycle for gaming and entertainment consoles
averages five to ten years. Nintendo released their latest
generation console in November 2012. Sony released their latest
generation console in November 2013.
We believe the success of gaming and entertainment consoles is
determined by the availability of games for the console, providing
exclusive game content that gamers seek, the computational power
and reliability of the console, and the ability to create new
experiences via online services, downloadable content, and
peripherals. In addition to Sony and Nintendo, we compete with
other providers of entertainment services through online
marketplaces. We believe the Xbox Platform is effectively
positioned against competitive products and services based on
significant innovation in hardware architecture, user interface,
developer tools, online gaming and entertainment services, and
continued strong exclusive content from our own game franchises as
well as other digital content offerings.
Surface devices face competition from computer, tablet, and other
hardware manufacturers, many of which are also current or potential
partners and customers.
Our phones face competition primarily from Samsung and Apple, as well as many other mobile device manufacturers. We believe our phones will compete by being tailored for virtually every demographic and geography worldwide, offering unique industrial design and imaging technologies at high and low ranges of price points, and by incorporating Microsoft’s digital work and digital life experiences.
We face competition for our Resale products and services from
various online marketplaces, including those operated by Amazon,
Apple, and Google.
Our search and display advertising business competes with Google
and a wide array of websites, social platforms like Facebook, and
portals like Yahoo! that provide content and online offerings to
end users. Our success depends on our ability to attract new users,
understand intent, and match intent with relevant content and
advertiser offerings. We believe we can attract new users by
continuing to offer new and compelling products and services. We
differentiate our offerings by providing a broad selection of
content that helps users make faster, informed decisions, and take
action more quickly by providing relevant search results, expanded
search services, and deeply-integrated social recommendations.
Competitors to Office 365 Consumer are the same as those discussed
above for Office Consumer.
Competitors to Studios are the same as those discussed above for
our Xbox gaming and entertainment business, as well as game studios
like Electronic Arts and Activision Blizzard.
Our server operating system products face competition from a wide variety of server operating systems and applications offered by companies with a range of market approaches. Vertically integrated computer manufacturers such as Hewlett-Packard, IBM, and Oracle offer their own versions of the Unix operating system preinstalled on server hardware. Nearly all computer manufacturers offer server hardware for the Linux operating system and many contribute to Linux operating system development. The competitive position of Linux has also benefited from the large number of compatible applications now produced by many commercial and non-commercial software developers. A number of companies, such as Red Hat, supply versions of Linux.
We compete to provide enterprise-wide computing solutions and point solutions with numerous commercial software vendors that offer solutions and middleware technology platforms, software applications for connectivity (both Internet and intranet), security, hosting, database, and e-business servers. IBM and Oracle lead a group of companies focused on the Java Platform Enterprise Edition that compete with our enterprise-wide computing solutions. Commercial competitors for our server applications for PC-based distributed client/server environments include CA Technologies, IBM, and Oracle. Our web application platform software competes with open source software such as Apache, Linux, MySQL, and PHP. In middleware, we compete against Java middleware such as Geronimo, Wildfly, and Spring Framework.
Our system management solutions compete with server management
and server virtualization platform providers, such as BMC, CA
Technologies, Hewlett-Packard, IBM, and VMware. Our database,
business intelligence, and data warehousing solutions offerings
compete with products from IBM, Oracle, SAP, and other companies.
Our products for software developers compete against offerings from
Adobe, IBM, Oracle, other companies, and open-source projects,
including Eclipse (sponsored by CA Technologies, IBM, Oracle, and
SAP), PHP, and Ruby on Rails, among others.
Our embedded systems compete in a highly fragmented environment in
which key competitors include IBM, Intel, and versions of
embeddable Linux from commercial
Linux vendors such as Metrowerks and MontaVista Software.
We believe our server products provide customers with advantages in
performance, total costs of ownership, and productivity by
delivering superior applications, development tools, compatibility
with a broad base of hardware and software applications, security,
and manageability.
Competitors to Windows Commercial are the same as those discussed
above for Windows in the D&C Licensing segment.
Office Commercial revenue growth depends on our ability to add value to the core product set and to continue to expand our product offerings in other areas such as content management, enterprise search, collaboration, unified communications, and business intelligence. Competitors to Office Commercial includes software application vendors such as Adobe Systems, Apple, Cisco Systems, Google, IBM, Oracle, SAP, and numerous web-based competitors as well as local application developers in Asia and Europe. Cisco Systems is using its position in enterprise communications equipment to grow its unified communications business. Google provides a hosted messaging and productivity suite. Web-based offerings competing with individual applications can also position themselves as alternatives to our products. We believe our products compete effectively based on our strategy of providing powerful, flexible, secure, easy to use solutions that work well with technologies our customers already have and are available on a device or via the cloud.
Skype competes with a variety of instant messaging, voice, and
video communication providers, ranging from start-ups to
established enterprises.
Our Microsoft Dynamics products compete with vendors such as Oracle
and SAP in the market for large organizations and divisions of
global enterprises. In the market focused on providing solutions
for small and mid-sized businesses, our Microsoft Dynamics products
compete with vendors such as Infor, The Sage Group, and NetSuite.
Salesforce.com’s cloud CRM offerings compete directly with
Microsoft Dynamics CRM on-premises offerings.
The Enterprise Services business competes with a wide range of
companies that provide strategy and business planning, application
development, and infrastructure services, including multinational
consulting firms and small niche businesses focused on specific
technologies.
Competitors to Office 365 Commercial are the same as those
discussed above for Office Commercial.
Microsoft Dynamics CRM’s online offerings primarily compete with
Salesforce.com’s on-demand CRM offerings.
Microsoft Azure faces diverse competition from companies such as
Amazon, Google, IBM, Oracle, Salesforce.com, VMware, and other open
source offerings.