Please, write about if you agree or disagree with Fromm's position and why Love and Human Existence.

Thank you so much.

Q # 1: Define what a Psychostimulant is and how it can alter mental activity?

Q # 2: What are the similarities and differences between Ephadra, Amphetamines, and Racemic?

Q # 3: What is the difference between methylphenidate and Amphetamine?

Q # 4: What are Cathinones and how are they different from Amphetamines?

Q # 5: What is a clandestine and why are they important to study within the field of drugs and behavior?

Q # 6: Compare and contrast the differences in drug route exposure/usage of the variations of Cocaine?

Q # 7: Describe the pro's and con's of Sigmund Freud's advocacy program for "Uber Coca"?

Q # 8: What is methlyecgonine and how does it impact drug users that abuse cocaine?

Q # 9: Explain the danger of reward outcomes for a person who engages in poly-drug use?

Q # 10: Explain the importance of understanding the mechanism of the Cocaine- and Amphetamine-regulated transcript (CART) within the synaptic communication of neurons?

Define and describe the major literary forms (genres) contained in the New Testament.

Discuss a situation where you used critical thinking that worked for you. (250)

You are free to create your own question and response. Following the format of questions 1-5 above, you are to design a question regarding the role of “social media” (Facebook, Twitter, Snapchat, Instagram, etc.) in socialization [For example, you could study the postings of an “Instagram Influencer” and how their postings encourage (socialize) their followers into a certain way of thinking, acting, or feeling]. Then you are to answer the question you created. Remember the focus is to be on the role of social media in socialization. [Your grade is based on the quality of the question created and the response]

Writing Project #1

Select a claim about any topic of your choice and provide three reasons for that claim. After presenting your argument in a narrative way, reconstruct it at the end of your work by clearly indicating its premises and conclusion with numbers and a conclusion indicator.

The conditions for receiving points for this work are as follows:

1. The Writing Project has a main claim about a topic of the student’s choice and provides three reasons for that claim.
2. The Writing Project presents the argument in a narrative way and this narrative presentation of the argument has premises and conclusion indicators.
3. The Writing Project has a complete and concise reconstruction of the argument at the end.
4. The Writing Project’s reconstruction of the argument identifies its premises and conclusion and lists them in logical order as instructed.
5. The Writing Project meets all conditions concerning editing, style, format, length, and originality.

If these conditions are met, you will earn up to 25 points.

For details on the grading policies, please check the Rubric for this assignment as well as Writing Projects in GUIDES TO WRITING, "Content" under the MATERIALS menu. All assignments will be evaluated within a week after the submission deadline. Do your own writing. Plagiarism is a very serious offense. Assignments that do not meet this condition will earn 0 point with no possibility of re-submission.

INSTRUCTOR'S SHORT SAMPLE (Students' narratives should be longer)

My conclusion is that capital punishment is wrong because of the following reasons. First reason: everybody involved in it suffers and nothing good is achieved. The guilty person suffers, his or her family suffers, the executioner suffers , and many others suffer too. Second reason, it presupposes that people who commit a serious crime could not be rehabilitated. That's a determinist view that is not supported by science. All of us have done at point something bad and then regret it and improve our lives through education and training.  Third reason, capital punishment amounts to cruel punishment. Although these fall short of providing a knock-down argument against capital punishment, they strongly suggest that it is wrong.

ARGUMENT RECONSTRUCTION

P1. Everybody involved in capital punished suffers.

P2. Nothing good is achieved with it.

P3. It presupposes that determinism is true

P4. Determinism is not true: people can improve

C1, Therefore, capital punishment is wrong.

Develop an analysis of one person’s experience or ‘case’ under COVID 19 (fictional or from your experience).Using an intersectional lens discuss how this person experiences the challenges of the pandemic based on the intersection of gender with different structures in their lives (i.e. race, class, sexuality, nationality, age, ability, etc.) In your discussion, be sure to identify their gender (male/female/non-binary, cis or trans, etc.) and discuss how their relative privilege or disadvantage in society differently impacts their life chances under the pandemic. (i.e. think about those who might not be able to leave their home and have limited funds such as single mothers, elderly, folks with disabilities, and many who are or are also immune-compromised, have recently lost their job, or are without shelter). Often, analyses of gender neglect other social structures. Discuss the limits of an analysis of gender that does not give attention to the other social structures impacting this person’s lived experience.

Apply psychodynamic theory to such delinquent acts as shoplifting and breaking and entering a house.

3) What does Elijah Anderson argue in the Code of the Street?

Investigating Fair-Mindedness in Critical Thinking
Discussion Questions
A) What steps can you take to become a more fair-minded thinker? Give an example of a time when you were not fair-minded in your thinking.
B) Why do Paul and Elder (2012) argue for intellectual standards in critical reasoning? Which of these standards is most difficult for you? Why?

Requirements for Discussion Boards

Utilize and interface with the required readings to analyze and engage the discussion board questions.

Your initial post should be roughly 200 words (plus or minus 10%). Each subsequent post should be 100 words (plus or minus 10%).

Include one or two scholarly sources that are not part of the required or recommended reading for the HUM101 course. The CSU-Global Library is a good place to find these sources.

Format your discussion, including all in-text citations and references, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA.

Each discussion board post (including follow-up posts) should include scholarly citations and references.

cons of the rational choice theory

A 300 word report on Marbury v Madison and why it was important historically.

avid Berkowitz was known as the “Son of Sam”. He was a serial killer in the NYC area during the span of 1976-1977. Prior to his apprehension, the media coverage of the events were at a fever pitch. The newspapers, to some degree, sensationalized the events and aided in spreading a panic across the city. People were scared, curfews were observed and it made a significant social impact. This week, we’ll explore the effect of serial killers on society and on criminological policy. Address the following prompts:

•   What are the Son of Sam Laws and how did this case influence them? (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Son_of_Sam_law)
•   In your opinion, what kind of social and psychological pressure/effects did these crimes have on the surrounding area? http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/07/nyregion/07sam.html?rref=collection/ti&_r=0)
•   What is “Rational Hedonism”? How does this contradict the actions of a serial killer? (http://www.rationalhedonism.org/ethics.html)
•   We know that formal and informal social controls keep society in check. For serial killers, do these “work”? Why/Why not?

what should a teacher done in the first day and week of the school? why its important

Based on Chapter 6, Reading 18 (Page 233) of book Family in Transition by Skolnick & Skolnick

Q. Discuss some of the challenges that blended families and stepfamilies face.

The book is available for free at https://1drv.ms/b/s!Aq4Y5j0NgDNugSM0_lnXdbap4wwn