Question

My introduction to taxation professor changed the grading scale without notifying us. The syllabus has not changed at all during or towards the end of the semester. We never knew that she changed the scale until our grades for the course were published. The syllabus states that an 87% to 89% is a B+ and that percentages that are .5% will be rounded up. My final percentage earned in the class was 86.74%, which qualifies for that round up. The professor said that yes, she did round up to an 87%, but she, "believes that an 80% to 89% is a B,"(Direct Quote) and gave me a B for my course grade. I attended every single one of her lectures and always participated. I would have remembered if she said there were changes made to the grading scale during our short, 5 week course. She did not mention changes were being made at all. I realize that there's not much a difference between a B and B+, but it affects one's GPA negatively if their average is high. What can I do? Do I talk to the department head or go to the dean with this issue? Is it still possible to get a B+? Also, is this an ethical thing for a professor to do? This has never happened in my entire educational career, and I have been a student for a long time. Please help. I am unsure what to do.

Also, please do not be biased and blame it on me for not achieving a better grade. I came here for help, not to be told I didn't try hard enough, which I did. I put in more work for that class than my other 2 summer classes combined Nobody received an A for the course out of 30 students. The professor was more than unwilling to answer questions the entire semester and was generally not available for assistance. Exams were full of mistakes, assignments and projects received zero feedback, unavailable during office hours, etc. I have about 16 other students who I've spoken with that can support my statements, who all say she was the worst professor at our university hands down.

Answer 1

A reviewing framework like the one we most usually use currently has too many rating levels for an excessive number of individual tasks and tests dependent on too expound a point structure to be viewed as basic. No big surprise understudies ask such huge numbers of inquiries about how they will be evaluated in a course thus frequently overlook the subtleties. Indeed, even educators get befuddled.

The schedule expresses that the rate between 87 to 89 will get a B+ and .5% will be adjusted. For this situation, accomplishing 86.74% would gather together to 87% as per the prospectus yet in genuine the understudy got under 87%, which is a reality.

It isn't moral to be changed evaluating arrangement of the test without the affirmation of understudies. It is anything but a matter of whether an understudy is there in B or B+ve. Everything about the assessment stamps and reviewing framework is to be conveyed to the understudies. On the off chance that there is any adjustment in the reviewing framework with the quick impact an understudy to be conveyed. I think this is a genuine issue to be known by the division head.