In what ways was the U.S Supreme Court a party to the repression of African American...

In what ways was the U.S Supreme Court a party to the repression of African American lives and politics in the 1870s, 80s, and 90s? 400 words

Expert Solution

Below is an absolutely accurate answer.

Ways was the U.S Supreme court in 70s ,80s and 90s were-

• Short-time period profits for AA during period - aftereffect of Republican gov.

• After ACW, South overwhelmed: structures, streets and railroads obliterated, peace now not reestablished, police and courtroom framework stalled, places of worship and college abandoned.

• Military triumph of North equals to limited cancelation in crushed South.

• Slavery turned into key piece of South - expulsion prompted exchange in Southern life!

-changes and laws have been surpassed to help social liberties-

• fourteenth Amendment (1868): gave AA citizenship + equal insurance below the law.

• fifteenth Amendment (1870): precluded forswearing of vote because of race.

• Civil Rights Act (1866): prohibited NAs however all exclusive races have been full residents, irrespective of whether beyond slaves.

• Military Reconstruction Act (1867): partitioned South into navy areas equal hooked up shows installation new country govs.

• In principle, AA had rights to gain ground

Thanks.

Hope you will appreciate it

Hayet Jeridi answered 1 year ago

According to the U.S. Supreme Court, what is not to be considered "community" under the current...

According to the U.S. Supreme Court, what is not to be considered "community" under the current test for determining if speech is obscene?

in what ways did the US Constitution betray the African and african american people in the...

in what ways did the US Constitution betray the African and african american people in the United States?

explain the diffrent ways the supreme court can be cheched if and when they abuse their...

explain the diffrent ways the supreme court can be cheched if and when they abuse their power?

What might distinguish how the U.S. Supreme Court found an act of Congress, which sought to...

What might distinguish how the U.S. Supreme Court found an act of Congress, which sought to prohibit possession of a gun within 1,000 feet of a school, to be an unconstitutional exercise of the interstate commerce clause, but the federal courts have repeatedly upheld the acts of Congress prohibiting discrimination in the area of civil rights, also based on the interstate commerce clause?

How did the Supreme Court use judicial review to change American society?

Identify and explain the steps of a Supreme Court case. Begin with how the Supreme Court...

Identify and explain the steps of a Supreme Court case. Begin with how the Supreme Court selects cases and then explain the actual steps of a Supreme Court hearing of a case. Lastly, explain the three types of opinions issued by the justices afterward.

In Griswold v. Connecticut, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that “specific guarantees in the Bill of...

In Griswold v. Connecticut, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that “specific guarantees in the Bill of Rights have penumbras, formed by emanations from those guarantees that help give them life and substance.” 1. Discuss the meaning and implications of Griswold’s penumbras and emanations 2. Describe the legal basis for an unenumerated right that might be located within these purported constitutional regions.

AMERICAN GOVERNMENT Currently, the Supreme Court does not allow cameras in their courtroom. They do release...

AMERICAN GOVERNMENT Currently, the Supreme Court does not allow cameras in their courtroom. They do release audio of oral arguments, as well as printed transcripts, and all court proceedings are open to the public. Should the Supreme Court add cameras into the courtroom? Do you think Supreme Court justices should have term limits? Currently, they are appointed for life. Do you have a favorite Supreme Court case? If so, why?

In Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005), the U.S. Supreme Court decided...

In Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005), the U.S. Supreme Court decided a case in which landowners challenged the power of a city in Connecticut to take their property for redevelopment. The redevelopment plan did not contemplate that all of the land would be open to the public. Parts would be privately developed. The plaintiffs alleged that the taking was unconstitutional because it was not for a public purpose. The Supreme Court rejected this claim. Use...

What is required to unseat a federal Supreme Court judge

Question