Question

In: Biology

what are the strongest argument for and against changing babies genetics ( designer babies)

what are the strongest argument for and against changing babies genetics ( designer babies)

Solutions

Expert Solution

The process of creating a designer baby is often questioned because of it’s shaky moral platform. Though there are certainly some positive things that can be obtained from the use of genetic engineering used on unborn babies, but it is often wondered if parents will have the right reasons to genetically modify their baby, or if reasoning will become more superficial.

Here are some of the arguments against the genetic engineering of babies:

i. If the process is not done carefully, the embryo could be accidentally terminated.

ii. Furthermore, the technology used is not 100% safe yet. It is only in the experimental stages at this point.

iii. Parents may use this technology for superficial purposes; such as purposely seeking out a blonde haired, blue eyed baby for appearance concerns only.

iv. Could create a gap in society. “Designer” babies would most likely be better looking, smarter, etc. This could create “classes” between designer and non designer babies.

v. Because the technology is so new, it is unknown whether genetically modifying the babies will effect the gene pool. This could cause difficulties later on throughout the baby’s family tree.

vi. A baby cannot consent to having it’s body altered; therefore some do not believe it’s right as parents do not own their children.

vii. Genes often have more than one use. For example, a gene that controls intelligence could also control anger management. You could end up with a genius, but very angry, child.

viii. Geneticists are not perfect people and cannot 100% properly evaluate every gene. It is more than likely mistakes will be made.

ix. Individuality will be slighted. Because most people will seek out good-looking, intelligent babies with other optimum characteristics, everyone will be relatively similar.

x. The procedure is not cheap, and not everyone would be able to afford it. This could create prejudice between Designer and non designer children. This could cause the non-designer children to miss opportunities because jobs among other things are more likely to take the optimum candidate for something.

xi. The ability to change as humans will falter.

Although there are many questions of if genetically modifying babies is ethical and for the moral reason, there are many positives to this type of treatment:

i. Installs a better understanding of genetics for genealogists and biologists.

ii. Increases human life span up to 30 years.

iii. Prevents genetic diseases such as down syndrome, Alzheimer’s, Huntington’s Disease, Spinal Muscular Atrophy, and many others.

iv. Reduces risk of inherited medical conditions such as obesity, anemia, diabetes, cancer, and many more.

v. Keeps up with modern technologies.

vi. Enhancement of children.

vii. Allows parents to give their child a healthy life.

viii. Genetically engineering babies is an option, not a requirement for all parents. For those that disagree with it, they don’t have to engineer their child.

ix. Children are already engineered by parents in many ways. Prenatal supplements, education, religion, and morals are all ways parents control their child.

x. Taking folate during pregnancy reduces risk of a child developing autism. This is an example of medically altering a child and it is considered ethically acceptable.

xi. Eliminates mitochondrial disorders.

xii. Parents set their own limits for genetically engineering their baby.

xiii. Government does not have the right to control means of reproduction.

xiv. Some environmental factors are inevitable so preventative measures should be taken as well.

xv. Allows prospective parents to give their child genes that they do not carry.

xvi. With all scientific and technological advancements there is ethical disparagement, the ethical view points should not cease the advancement of technology.

xvii. Although not all the kinks in this newly developing technology are fixed, with more clinical trials and experimentation, it has the potential to be a very promising.


Related Solutions

What is Callahan’s strongest argument against allowing the legalization of euthanasia? Evaluate that argument.
What is Callahan’s strongest argument against allowing the legalization of euthanasia? Evaluate that argument.
what are your thoughts on the idea of " designer babies " ? ( please use...
what are your thoughts on the idea of " designer babies " ? ( please use citations id like to see )
Present what you regard as the strongest argument for ethical relativism.
Present what you regard as the strongest argument for ethical relativism.
what's an argument against relying too heavily on Hadith? What is a Quranic based argument in...
what's an argument against relying too heavily on Hadith? What is a Quranic based argument in favor of Hadith? i picked the wrong subject so the right one is socialogy
what argument could some lodge against the RIMS strategy
what argument could some lodge against the RIMS strategy
What is the rationale choice-based explanation of terrorism? Provide one argument FOR and AGAINST it then...
What is the rationale choice-based explanation of terrorism? Provide one argument FOR and AGAINST it then offer your own view.
What are the major arguments for and against privatizing public services? One argument that is used...
What are the major arguments for and against privatizing public services? One argument that is used by both sides of the debate is that private firms can lower labor costs. Why is this seen as some as either a good or bad impact of privatization? How has the privatization of such services as fire-fighting and 911 worked out?
The Dictator Game The strongest experimental evidence against the idea that people are only interested in...
The Dictator Game The strongest experimental evidence against the idea that people are only interested in what they can get for themselves comes from the dictator game. The Rules: In the game, two people interact anonymously. One of them is randomly designated as the “dictator.” It is his job to split an amount of money that is put up for that purpose by the researcher running the game. A typical amount is $10. The defining feature of the game is...
Present an argument for and against the social benefits and costs of insurance.
Present an argument for and against the social benefits and costs of insurance.
Define what the multiplier is AND explain how and why it works. Explain two argument against...
Define what the multiplier is AND explain how and why it works. Explain two argument against Robert Gordon’s claim that wage stagnation is due to the exhaustion of technological progress.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT