Question

what's an argument against relying too heavily on Hadith? What is a Quranic based argument in favor of Hadith?

i picked the wrong subject so the right one is socialogy

Answer 1

Hadith are assortments of reports of the sunnah of the Islamic prophet Muhammad — for example his words, activities, and the quiet endorsement of on any matter. At the end of the day, something that is credited to Muhammad yet isn't found in the Quran. Criticism of hadith takes a few structures Among the researchers who accept that even sahih hadith experience the ill effects of defilement or who proposed impediments on use of hadith incorporate early Muslims Al-Nazzam, Ibn Sa'd, Al-Nawawi Ibn Hajar, later reformers Syed Ahmed Khan, Muhammad Iqbal; and researchers from the West the significant reasons for corruption of even the ṣaḥīḥ hadith of Bukhari and Muslim are:

• Political conflicts
• Partisan prejudice
• The longing to decipher the basic importance, as opposed to the first words verbatim.

Different reactions made of hadith include:

That whatever the rationale, there are unquestionable logical inconsistencies in hadith, which means some sahih hadith must not be right.

That hadith is a significant wellspring of the Islamic law that include the respect, property and lives of Muslims, and that in spite of the fact that sahih hadith are characterized as "valid"— evaluated above Hasan (great) and daif (power less) hadith—this class of hadith don't give "sureness of information" required for lawmaking. Mutawatir hadith (which means reports from "countless storytellers whose understanding upon an untruth is unfathomable") do meet that basis, however, their outrageous shortage confines their utilization being developed of Islamic law.

2. Following the hadith isn't expressly referenced in the Quran; be that as it may, it contains numerous sections with respect to dutifulness to the Messenger. Since what the Messenger says, does, and endorses of with respect to issues of religion is Sunnah, in light of the fact that complying with the Prophet is mandatory, at that point following the Sunnah is required (as a rule). Since Sunnah is gathered and is known to us through what we find in sound hadith, at that point following the hadith is, as a rule, required too. The Hadith is our solitary access to the Prophet's Sunnah, in this manner, we should tail it. The hadith is a working Quran. It’s a small clarification of the Quran. They go connected at the hip.

The Quran probably won't have legitimately utilized the word "hadith". Yet, it plainly advises the Muslim confidence to rehearse the religion by following the lessons of the prophet. The lessons of the prophet are the hadith.

Muslims can't rehearse the religion without the hadith. At the point when one understands this, it becomes justifiable that a hadith can be completely authentic and sound however it basically doesn't speak to the sunnah or acknowledged practice. It might essentially allude to an erratic occasion. In this way you can build up that something is obviously allowable, however, doesn't really speak to the sunnah position i.e. the built-up training of the Prophet Muhammad, harmony arrive, and those nearest to him.