In: Nursing
What is Callahan’s strongest argument against allowing the legalization of euthanasia? Evaluate that argument.
1) ans)Callahan argues against this view on three grounds: that euthanasia and assisted suicide are evil, or more accurately, “morally mistaken”; that while physical pain and psychological suffering in the terminally ill are to be alleviated, assisted dying is not the way to do it; and that allowing physician-assisted suicide will risk wider killing based on “private standards of a life worth living”—the slippery slope argument. These are among the most prominent arguments in the case against legalization of assisted dying.
There are many powerful arguments for and against euthanasia.
People with different beliefs may agree with many of these arguments. For example, an atheist
may recognise that there are dangers in allowing euthanasia (the slippery slope argument), but they might argue that an individual's right to direct their own life outweighs other good arguments.
Many religious believers are likely to have great sympathy with arguments that a person should not have to live in agony, but for them, the idea that life is sacred
may outweigh other arguments, however good.
Arguments for euthanasia
Some arguments in favour of euthanasia include:
Human beings should have the right to be able to decide when and how they die (self-determination).
Euthanasia enables a person to die with dignity and in control of their situation.
Death is a private matter and the state should not interfere with the individual's right to die.
It is expensive to keep people alive when there is no cure for their illness. Euthanasia would release precious resources to treat people who could live.
Family and friends would be spared the pain of seeing their loved one suffer a long-drawn-out death.
Society permits animals to be put down as an act of kindness when they are suffering; the same treatment should be available to humans.
Arguments against euthanasia
Some non-religious arguments against euthanasia include:
euthanasia would weaken society's respect for the value and importance of human life
proper palliative care is available which reduces or removes the need for people to be in pain
it would lead to worse care for the terminally ill
it would put too much power in the hands of doctors, and damage the trust between patient and doctor
some people may feel pressured to request euthanasia by family, friends or doctors, when it isn't what they really want
it would undermine the commitment of doctors and nurses to save lives
it would discourage the search for new cures and treatments for the terminally ill
some people unexpectedly recover
some people may change their mind about euthanasia and be unable to tell anyone
voluntary euthanasia could be the first step on a slippery slope that leads to involuntary euthanasia, where those who are undesirable or seen as a problem could be killed
Please Rate the answer ? thank you