Question

1. A major topic in the foreign policy area today is how far the United States should intervene in humanitarian crises in other countries. Some people say the United States has a moral responsibility to intervene if there is a humanitarian crisis in another country or an issue like an oppressive dictator taking advantage of the people. Some people say the United States should worry about its own people, that we have people in our country who are suffering, and we should not intervene in a crisis in another country unless it directly impacts the United States in some way. Presidents and members of the United States Congress will give their opinions on this when they are running for election. What are your thoughts and fully explain your answer. at least 5-6 sentences

Answer 1

When every country decides to join the United Nations where United States is also an integral part it has to be understood that one of the main rule of United Nations is for the countries not to intervene in the sovereign affairs of the other Nations on the whole if you strictly follow the rule you are not allowed to intervene and that is the reason why you have to understand that it is better for United States not to intervene in such situation but when there is a humanitarian crisis it is always better to approach the United Nations rather than to that a detailed response from the United Nation member countries can be achieved and through mutual cooperation they can decide what is right and what is wrong and this is something highly required and directly interveningsolver in affairs of other states is not a good practice as it can hamper the international relations on the whole. Though there is a moral obligation it is important to maintain diplomacy in such instances rather than going for a military force so that the issue can be resolved in that way where it can also take a policies like accepting refugees etc