Question

In: Economics

Five mutually exclusive cost alternatives that have infinite lives are under consideration for decreasing the fruit-bruising...

Five mutually exclusive cost alternatives that have infinite lives are under consideration for decreasing the fruit-bruising rates of a thin skin-fruit grading and packing operation (peaches, pears, apricots, etc.). The initial costs and cash flows of each alternative are available. If the MARR is 15% per year, the one alternative to select is:

Alternative A B C D E
Initial cost, $ −15,000 −12,000 −9,000 −14,000 −11,000
Cash flow,
$ per year
−300 −900 −1400 −700 −1000

A

B

D

E

Solutions

Expert Solution

Present Worth method is being used to select the best alternative.

Alternative A -

Initial cost = $ -15,000

Cash flow per year = $ -300

MARR = 15%

Useful life = Infinity

Calculate the present worth of Alternative A -

PW = Initial cost + cash flow (P/A, i, n)

PW = -15,000 - 300(P/A, 15%, )

PW = -15,000 - (300 * (1/0.15))

PW = -15,000 - 1,999.98

PW = -16,999.98

The Present Worth of Alternative A is $ -16,999.98

Alternative B -

Initial cost = $ -12,000

Cash flow per year = $ -900

MARR = 15%

Useful life = Infinity

Calculate the present worth of Alternative B -

PW = Initial cost + cash flow (P/A, i, n)

PW = -12,000 - 900(P/A, 15%, )

PW = -12,000 - (900 * (1/0.15))

PW = -12,000 - 5,999.94

PW = -17,999.94

The Present Worth of Alternative B is $ -17,999.94

Alternative C -

Initial cost = $ -9,000

Cash flow per year = $ -1,400

MARR = 15%

Useful life = Infinity

Calculate the present worth of Alternative C -

PW = Initial cost + cash flow (P/A, i, n)

PW = -9,000 - 1,400(P/A, 15%, )

PW = -9,000 - (1,400 * (1/0.15))

PW = -9,000 - 9,333.24

PW = -18,333.24

The Present Worth of Alternative C is $ -18,333.24

Alternative D -

Initial cost = $ -14,000

Cash flow per year = $ -700

MARR = 15%

Useful life = Infinity

Calculate the present worth of Alternative D -

PW = Initial cost + cash flow (P/A, i, n)

PW = -14,000 - 700(P/A, 15%, )

PW = -14,000 - (700 * (1/0.15))

PW = -14,000 - 4,666.62

PW = -18,666.62

The Present Worth of Alternative D is $ -18,666.62

Alternative E -

Initial cost = $ -11,000

Cash flow per year = $ -1,000

MARR = 15%

Useful life = Infinity

Calculate the present worth of Alternative E -

PW = Initial cost + cash flow (P/A, i, n)

PW = -11,000 - 1000(P/A, 15%, )

PW = -11,000 - (1000 * (1/0.15))

PW = -11,000 - 6,666.6

PW = -17,666.6

The Present Worth of Alternative E is $ -17,666.6

The present worth of Alternative A is numerically higher.

So, based on present worth analysis, Alternative A should be selected.


Related Solutions

Two mutually exclusive alternatives of A and B have both useful lives of 6 years. For...
Two mutually exclusive alternatives of A and B have both useful lives of 6 years. For Alternative A there is an initial cost of $7,200, and the annual benefits, which is $2,100 for the first year and it increases by $120 each year for the next 5 years. For Alternative B, there is an initial cost of $3000 and the annual benefits, which is $1200 for the first year, and it increases by $100 each year for the next 5...
Two mutually exclusive alternatives are bring considered: A and B. Both alternatives cost $1,200 at the...
Two mutually exclusive alternatives are bring considered: A and B. Both alternatives cost $1,200 at the present. However, the pattern of revenue from them is different. Alternative A has the potential to bring more revenues later in the project life. The expected revenues of alternative A are: $350, $500, and $850 by the ends of years one to three, respectively. Alternative B promises more immediate cash inflow which is expected to diminish with time: $750, $300, and $100 by the...
Two mutually exclusive alternatives are bring considered: A and B. Both alternatives cost $1,200 at the...
Two mutually exclusive alternatives are bring considered: A and B. Both alternatives cost $1,200 at the present. However, the pattern of revenue from them is different. Alternative A has the potential to bring more revenues later in the project life. The expected revenues of alternative A are: $350, $500, and $850 by the ends of years one to three, respectively. Alternative B promises more immediate cash inflow which is expected to diminish with time: $750, $300, and $100 by the...
Two mutually exclusive proposals, each with a life of 5 years, are under consideration. MARR is...
Two mutually exclusive proposals, each with a life of 5 years, are under consideration. MARR is 12%. Each proposal has the following cash flow profile: EOY NCF(A) NCF(B) 0 -$30,000 -$42,000 1 $9,300 $12,625 2 $9,300 $12,625 3 $9,300 $12,625 4 $9,300 $12,625 5 $9,300 $12,625 Determine which alternative the decsion maker should select using the internal rate of return method. Note: Need to use uncremental IRR analysis to calculate exact IRR Please give the written answer, not the excel...
A manufacturing company is considering two mutually exclusive alternatives. Alternatives                            &nb
A manufacturing company is considering two mutually exclusive alternatives. Alternatives                                    Alt. A         Alt. B Initial cost              $ 42,500    $ 70,000 Annual costs O & M                      $ 6,000       $ 4,000 Annual savings       $ 18,500   $ 20,000 Residual value         $ 12,000   $ 25,000 Shelf life                   3 years   6 years What would be the "advantage" in annual terms of Alternative B versus Alternative A at 15% interest? Select one: a. $ 3020 b. $ 3500 c. $ 7436 d. Alternative B does...
Simson Berhad has three mutually exclusive projects under consideration. The expected cash flows are given in...
Simson Berhad has three mutually exclusive projects under consideration. The expected cash flows are given in the following table. The minimum required rate of return on any project chosen by Simson bhd is 10.5%. Project A Project B Project C Initial Investment RM 484m 682m 467m Years Cash Flows RM in million 1 128 150 95 2 241 265 239 3 115 246 216 4 105 227 96 5 95 94 53 6 15 26 12 Environment restoration cost 50...
Simson Berhad has three mutually exclusive projects under consideration. The expected cash flows are given in...
Simson Berhad has three mutually exclusive projects under consideration. The expected cash flows are given in the following table. The minimum required rate of return on any project chosen by Simson bhd is 10.5%. Project A Project B Project C Initial Investment RM 484m 682m 467m Years Cash Flows RM in million 1 128 150 95 2 241 265 239 3 115 246 216 4 105 227 96 5 95 94 53 6 15 26 12 Environment restoration cost 50...
The following 3 mutually exclusive projects are under consideration. Use Incremental IRR to determine which project...
The following 3 mutually exclusive projects are under consideration. Use Incremental IRR to determine which project should be undertaken if MARR = 18%. year Proj. A Projc. B Proj. C 0 $-500,000 $-350,000 $-700,000 1 $200,000 $100,000 $300,000 2 $200,000 $150,000 $300,000 3 $250,000 $200,000 $300,000 4 $250,000 $250,000 $300,000
Two alternatives are under consideration. The first alternative will cost $100,000, require $20,000 in maintenance and...
Two alternatives are under consideration. The first alternative will cost $100,000, require $20,000 in maintenance and operation costs each year, and a life cycle of 4 years. The second alternative will cost $300,000, require $5,000 in maintenance and operation costs each year and a life of 6 years. Neither option will have a salvage value. In order to compute the present worth or future worth, how many years of each alternative should I use to accurately compare the two alternatives.
A firm is considering two mutually exclusive investment alternatives, both of which cost $5,000. The firm's...
A firm is considering two mutually exclusive investment alternatives, both of which cost $5,000. The firm's expected rate of return is 12 percent. The cash flows associated with each investment are: Year Investment A Investment B 1 $ 2000 $ 1000 2 $1500 $ 1500 3 $1500 $ 2000 4 $1000 $3000 For each alternative calculate the payback period, the net present value, and the profitably index. Which alternative (if any) should be selected?
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT