In: Economics
Two mutually exclusive alternatives are bring considered: A and B. Both alternatives cost $1,200 at the present. However, the pattern of revenue from them is different. Alternative A has the potential to bring more revenues later in the project life. The expected revenues of alternative A are: $350, $500, and $850 by the ends of years one to three, respectively. Alternative B promises more immediate cash inflow which is expected to diminish with time: $750, $300, and $100 by the ends of years one to three, respectively. Use MARR=8%.
a) Calculate the Internal Rate of Return of each alternative.
b) Which alternatives are feasible?
c) Calculate the Net Present Worth of each alternative and compare them.
Solution :-
(a) :-
Two mutually exclusive alternatives are bring considered: A and B.
Both alternatives cost = $1,200
The expected revenues of alternative A are = $350, $500, and $850 by the ends of years one to three, respectively.
Alternative B promises more immediate cash inflow which is expected to diminish with time = $750, $300, and $100 by the ends of years one to three, respectively.
MARR = 8%
* Calculating the Internal Rate of Return of each alternative.
IRR is computed using excel IRR function as follows :-
Alternative A | Alternative B | |||
Year | cash flow($) | Year | cash flow ($) | |
0 | -1200 | 0 | -1200 | |
1 | 350 | 1 | 750 | |
2 | 500 | 2 | 300 | |
3 | 850 | 3 | 100 | |
IRR = | 16.78% | IRR = | -2.91% |
(b) :-
As we calculated the Internal Rate of Return of each alternative A and B.
Alternative A has positive IRR that is higher than MRR.
So, Alternative A is feasible and alternative B is not.
(c) :-
Calculating the Net Present Worth of each alternative and comparing them.
Net present worth of,
Alternative A ($) = -1200 + 350 x P/F( 8%, 1) + 500 x P/F ( 8%, 2) + 850 x P/F ( 8%, 3)
= -1200 + 350 x 0.9259 + 500 x 0.8573 + 850 x 0.7938
= -1200 + 324.07 + 428.65 + 674.73
= -1200 + 1427.45
= 227.45
Net present worth of,
Alternative B ($) = -1200 + 750 x P/F( 8%, 1) + 300 x P/F ( 8%, 2) + 100 x P/F ( 8%, 3)
= -1200 + 750 x 0.9259 + 300 x 0.8573 + 100 x 0.7938
= -1200 + 694.43 + 257.19 + 79.38
= -1200 + 1031
= -169
Alternative A has positive net present worth and alternative B has negative net present worth.
So, Alternative A is acceptable.