Suggest 3 ways to increase committee bonding and plan a pre-fest providing all the necessary details. Consider the committee is of around 125 people and the pre-fest will be hosted by the committee which will have contingents from different colleges from all over India. Take into concepts of event management.
In: Operations Management
What do cashier-less stores have to do with communication, the internet, intranet, and extranets? Please no plagiarism, post reference
In: Operations Management
The following data (read the data down first and then over to the right) represent the weekly accounts receivable balance (in $1000) of a hardware distributor over a 30-week period.
128.703 120.649 126.215 129.426 135.816 125.131 131.122 121.774 125.367 121.076 |
119.848 127.251 153.923 125.658 122.172 129.268 122.912 125.351 130.572 116.875 |
122.587 127.677 132.364 130.950 118.662 131.902 132.220 128.522 132.270 122.671 |
In: Operations Management
The monthly sales for Yazici Batteries, Inc., were as follows:
Month
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sept
Oct
Nov
Dec
Sales
21
21
15
12
11
16
16
18
22
21
20
24
This exercise contains only parts b and c.
b) The forecast for the next month (Jan) using the naive method =
nothing
sales (round your response to a whole number).
The forecast for the next period (Jan) using a 3-month moving average approach =
nothing
sales (round your response to two decimal places).
The forecast for the next period (Jan) using a 6-month weighted average with weights of
0.10,
0.10,
0.10,
0.20,
0.20,
and
0.30,
where the heaviest weights are applied to the most recent month =
nothing
sales (round your response to one decimal place).
Using exponential smoothing with
alphaα
=
0.35
and a September forecast of
20.00,
the forecast for the next period (Jan) =
nothing
sales (round your response to two decimal places).
Using a method of trend projection, the forecast for the next month (Jan) =
nothing
sales (round your response to two decimal places).
c) The method that can be used for making a forecast for the month of March is
▼
.
In: Operations Management
Case 11–3 Carmichael Corporation
Amanda Tellford, purchasing manager for Carmichael Corporation, became increasingly concerned about the purchase of MS-7, a special ingredient used in Stimgro, one of her company’s new products. It appeared that a major cost increase might threaten the product’s profit- ability, and Amanda was anxious to explore any alternatives that promised at least some cost relief.
CARMICHAEL CORPORATION
Carmichael Corporation was the U.S. subsidiary of Carmichael International, a UK-based producer of veterinary products and feed additives. Total U.S. sales were expected to be about $20 million with profits before taxes of about $1.2 million. Carmichael occupied a special niche in the market, offering small-volume specialty products that the bigger producers considered uneconomical. However, if sales of these products grew, the possibility existed that a larger producer might become interested. Carmichael had an exclusive distribution agreement with three distributors who covered all parts of the United States. Each distributor sold Carmichael products to feed stores, cooperatives,
and farm supply stores, which, in turn, sold to the farmer. For Stimgro the pricing structure through the distribution chain was approximately as follows:
(Stimgro) Carmichael ->$360 -> Distributor -> $520 -> Feed Store - >$780 - > Farmer
The Carmichael plant located in Chicago employed about 70 hourly rated people. The premises were leased and primary activities involved the mixing of ingredients and the bottling and packing of finished products. About half of the $8 million worth of ingredients was imported from the UK parent; the remainder and all packaging were purchased in the United States. The executive team consisted of Tim Paterson, president and treasurer; Charles Godfrey, sales manager; Amanda Tellford, manager of accounting and purchasing; and Andrew Hartwick, plant manager.
Carmichael Corporation concentrated on poultry medicines and feed additives. Three years earlier, Carmichael had introduced Stimgro, a feed additive for young turkeys, which had shown unusual promise in promoting rapid, healthy development in birds less than one month old. Shortly there
after, a competitor, Brisson, introduced a similar product. Because Brisson, like Carmichael, had its own exclusive distributors, Brisson’s entry into the market did not result in lower Stimgro sales for Carmichael. Small specialty producers like Carmichael and Brisson did not compete on price or manufacturing cost. Their big concern was finding new products to sell and making sufficient profit before the prod- uct was taken over by a larger company or lost its market appeal. Carmichael and Brisson had about equal shares in the Stimgro market with annual sales of about $1.4 million each.
Carmichael imported the two primary ingredients for Stimgro from its UK parent and mixed and packaged them in the Chicago plant. The manufacturing cost for Stimgro is shown in Exhibit 1. Carmichael’s selling price of Stimgro was $360 per kilogram. Amanda Tellford had tried to find a North American source for MS-7 over the past few years but had found that all potential sources, pharmaceutical, and specialty chemical firms had declined serious interest. They claimed the volume was far too low, and the price would have to be at least $800 per kilogram before they could be persuaded to manufacture MS-7.
Exhibit 1
(cost/kg)
MS-7 (500 grams) - $100
Other ingrediants (500 grams) - $48
Packaging – 4
Labor – 8
Overhead – 20
Total - $180
BRISSON
Brisson Corporation was a U.S.-owned manufacturer of products similar to those marketed by Carmichael. Brisson’s range of products was greater than Carmichael’s, and its annual sales volume was about $24 million. Brisson had originally obtained its MS-7 from a UK competitor of Carmichael International, but in the spring of the current year it had placed orders for equipment to manufacture its own MS-7. This action had surprised Amanda Tellford because, like Carmichael, Brisson had been relatively poorly prepared to take this step. For example, the North American market demand for MS-7 was limited to its use by Carmichael and Brisson. Although future growth might show a healthy increase, total current market demand certainly did not warrant the $1 million investment Brisson had to make.
Moreover, MS-7 was tricky to produce, requiring very careful temperature, pressure, and timing control. The main equipment item was a large glass-lined autoclave ingeniously instrumented and constructed to deal with the unusual demands of MS-7 production. The autoclave was normally a fairly general-purpose type of equipment in the chemical industry. However, the special conditions required for the manufacture of MS-7 made this reactor a special-purpose tool, certainly overdesigned and overengineered for the other uses to which Brisson might apply it. MS-7 manufacture was a batch production process, and the expected capacity of the equipment was about 40,000 kilograms per year based on two-shift operation.
In Amanda Tellford’s eyes, Brisson’s action affected her own purchases of MS-7, which up to this point had been at an advantageous transfer price from the UK parent. Although the exact impact was still not entirely clear, she expected at least a 40 percent increase in her laid-down cost. Amanda had no doubt that Brisson would aggressively seek customs protection from undervalued MS-7 imports and that at least a 20 percent duty would be applied on the American selling price.
Amanda Tellford, therefore, requested information from the parent company concerning manufacturing costs of MS-7. She added several other data from her own knowledge and prepared the following summary:
Summary of MS-7 cost and price data :
Minimum equipment outlay installed; $1 million
Delivery on equipment : 9–12 months
UK normal market price : $224/kg
Our laid-down current cost from Carmichael, UK : $200/kg
Carmichael (UK) out-of-pocket cost (material, labor, and variable overhead) : $160/kg
Estimated minimum laid-down cost in Chicago after Brisson starts production : $280/kg
Amanda Tellford went to see Charles Godfrey, Carmichael’s sales manager, to discuss possible sales requirements for the future. Charles said, “It’s really anybody’s guess. First, it depends on the popularity of turkeys. We are banking on continued growth there. Second, as soon as the feed compa- nies can develop a suitable substitute for our product, they will go for it. We appear to be very expensive on a weight basis, although research and actual results show we represent excellent value. It takes such tiny quantities of Stimgro to improve the overall quality of a mix that it is difficult to believe it could have any impact. More competition can enter this market any day. We are just not large enough in the U.S. market to have any strong promotional impact. Each of our product lines is specialized, of relatively small volume, in an area where the big firms choose not to operate. Should a larger firm enter this market, they could flat- ten us. Now you tell me how to turn this into a reasonable forecast.”
Amanda Tellford replied, “I’m glad that’s your problem and not mine, Charles. Anytime you feel you’re ready to put some figures down, please let me know, because it may become very important for us in the near future.”
In looking over past figures, Amanda estimated that the second half of this year’s requirements would total about 1,000 kilograms of MS-7. Amanda decided that she had better think out the effect that Brisson’s decision to make MS-7 might have on her future purchasing strategy.
Case 11-3: Carmichael Corporation
Discussion Questions:
Main Question:
In: Operations Management
In: Operations Management
MOST POPULAR : Business Analyst Interview Question:
1.Explain Traceability
2.Explain change Management
3.What is a change Request
4.How will you handle a change request?
In: Operations Management
EXPLAIN THE ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF EMPLOYING HOME COUNTRY, HOST COUNTRY, AND THIRD COUNTRY MANAGERS.
In: Operations Management
A system has five workstations (A, B, C, D, and E) connected in sequence, with process times of 5, 10, 4, 9, and 8 seconds per unit each, respectively. Each workstation contains a single machine.
1. which workstation is the bottleneck of the system:
a. Workstation A
b. Workstation B
c. Workstation C
d. Workstation D
2. the system process time of this process is:
a. 5.1 seconds
b. 10 seconds
c. 15 seconds
d. 36 seconds
3. assume Workstation B now contains two machines, each of which can process a 1 unit every 10 seconds. What is the throughput time of this process?
a. 9 seconds
b. 10 seconds
c. 36 seconds
d. 46 seconds
In: Operations Management
MOST POPULAR : Business Analyst Interview Question
1. Describe A Time When You Improved A Business Process
2.Six Ways To Manage Conflicts Between Stakeholders
3.How Do You Conduct A Gap Analysis?
4.What Is Business Process Mapping?
In: Operations Management
In: Operations Management
MOST POPULAR : Business Analyst Interview Question:
1.What is process modeling?
2.How do you capture functional requirements?
3.What is a use case Framework?
4.Explain Use Cases?
In: Operations Management
9.3. Jean Clark is the manager of the Midtown Saveway Grocery Store. She now needs to replenish her supply of strawberries. Her regular supplier can provide as many cases as she wants. However, because these strawberries already are very ripe, she will need to sell them tomorrow and then discard any that remain unsold. Jean estimates that she will be able to sell 10, 11, 12, or 13 cases tomorrow. She can purchase the strawberries for $3 per case and sell them for $8 per case. Jean now needs to decide how many cases to purchase.
Jean has checked the store’s records on daily sales of strawberries. On this basis, she estimates that the prior probabilities are 0.2, 0.4, 0.3, and 0.1 for being able to sell 10, 11, 12, and 13 cases of strawberries tomorrow.
|
|
|
|
|
In: Operations Management
WHAT ARE SOME BARRIERS TO ENTERING THE INTERNATIONAL MARKET? PROVIDE EXAMPLES.
In: Operations Management
Case Study Instructions: Read this case study and answer the
questions that follow: Virgin was founded in 1970 by Richard
Branson and is classified as a holding company for multiple
ventures under the Virgin Group. When it comes to innovation Virgin
is one of the top companies in the world. What began as a mail
order record company has evolved into one of the most diverse
companies in existence. Virgin invests in and builds companies that
revolve around delivering fantastic customer experience and change
the scope of industries. They do everything from space tourism to
air travel, make comic books and video games. The company now holds
over 200 companies and operates in 29 countries. They’ve found that
the most successful ideas they get are the ones that are marketing,
sales, and customer focused, sit under the Virgin brand, have a
well-defined and differentiated customer offer and oftentimes are
delivered in partnership with experts in their field.
Virgin takes the ideas it gets and boils them down into several
categories. Anything that doesn’t quite fit into an existing
company gets sent to corporate development for review. They take
the time to read and respond to every proposal. They do not
disclose how rewards are awarded but there are substantial ones for
good ideas that are implemented. Internally Virgin also sources
business plans and ideas from employees. Once a flight attendant
had an idea. It got presented to the CEO and before long she had a
considerable role in starting up Virgin Brides (which beyond being
a fantastic idea didn’t quite work out in the market place). It’s
incredible that a flight attendant can have an idea that makes it
that far in a company. Notice that Virgin has over 200 companies
under it. If you stop for a second you’ll realize just how massive
that number is. That is a lot of innovation for a company only 40
years old. Financially they do quite well so obviously something
has been working out for them. Not a lot of firms innovate this
much or support this much innovation but that’s kind of the key –
they don’t just source great ideas, they act on them. Sourcing this
many fantastic ideas isn’t easy – it’s a lot of hard work for the
company and they have to devote time and resources to going through
all of them never mind actually taking the time to respond. But it
shows that they care and that they’re serious about this. All great
innovations come from an idea. Some go so far as to say it’s the
most important part of the process (Seth Godin would likely
disagree and say that shipping is the most important). Some
companies looking at Virgin’s requirements might find them
surprisingly strict, others surprisingly loose. No matter how you
view it the only thing that remains true at the end of the day is
that Virgin’s strategy works – and it works well.
Required:
Business excellence is about strategy. From the case study which
strategies has Virgin used to achieve continuous creativity and
innovation.
In: Operations Management