Question

In: Operations Management

Do the Courts have too much power to make policy from the bench? Consider issues such...

Do the Courts have too much power to make policy from the bench? Consider issues such as abortion, equal access to education, the use of religious symbols in public schools, etc. Should decisions on controversial issues like these be made by Courts or by Legislators? Why? Illustrate your answer with your own research.

Solutions

Expert Solution

While this topic seems to simply represent the debate between the role of legislature and judiciary, it also brings into the picture the troubling trend which is shaking the foundation of our constitution. The constitution has a very definite and defined role for both judiciary and legislature. The legislature is the democratic body which is entitled with the responsibility to create and amend laws. These legislators are the representatives of people and judiciary is the body that is responsible to interpret and apply the laws and preside over legal disputes.

The growing trend where the litigants are using the judiciary as an alternative source for achiving their own alternate political goals and agendas is disturbing. By doing so, the litigants, or even the members of the jury, try to bypass the fundamentals of the constitution and challenges the structure of the constitution itself.

Controversial issues that generate a lot of public interest and are regularly covered by the media become an easy instrument for bypassing the constitutional structure of going through the legislators. The thought to use this channel to gain one’s political objective is appealing as it allows a person to bypass persuading a majority of legislators and the political constituencies these elected officials represent and allows the litigant to focus on winning the heart and mind of a single panel of judges. This reduces difficulties and gives a greater chance of success. It is known fact that to enact a legislation is a cumbersome process, but it is for this very reason that it is the right process to go through. As our legislators create law, it considers the mood of the nation. Law making should be reserved for the people of a nation and their representatives and the courts should exercise their right to correct what’s wrong not to define what’s correct and what’s wrong.


Related Solutions

Do the Courts have too much power to make policy from the bench? Consider issues such...
Do the Courts have too much power to make policy from the bench? Consider issues such as abortion, equal access to education, the use of religious symbols in public schools, etc. Should decisions on controversial issues like these be made by Courts or by Legislators? Why? Illustrate your answer with your own research.
Do you think the president has too much power as Commander In Chief? Not enough power?...
Do you think the president has too much power as Commander In Chief? Not enough power? Do you believe the War Powers Act to be constitutional or unconstitutional?
Discuss whether administrative agencies have too much power. Why or why not?
Discuss whether administrative agencies have too much power. Why or why not?
20. In a survey, three out of four students said that courts show too much concern...
20. In a survey, three out of four students said that courts show too much concern for criminals. Of seventy randomly selected students Would 68 be considered an unusually high number of students who feel that courts are partial to criminals? A. The correct answer is not among the choices. B. Yes, because P(X ≥ 68) ≤ .05 C. Yes, because P(X ≤ 68) ≤ .05 D. No,because P(X≥68)≤.05 E. No,because P(X≤68)≤.05 21. In a survey, three out of four...
Make a list of what you would consider too much to self-disclose on a first date....
Make a list of what you would consider too much to self-disclose on a first date. Compare and evaluate what you thought was acceptable. Are there some items on your list that you should reconsider as appropriate? Write at least a one-page overview of your findings.
What presumption do the courts make in commercial agreements?
What presumption do the courts make in commercial agreements?
1. Does the FED have too much power on international arena? 2. Does the FED abuse...
1. Does the FED have too much power on international arena? 2. Does the FED abuse its power? 3. How can the FED influence global economy?
what point is there too much intervention by the FED into monetary policy in the economy?
what point is there too much intervention by the FED into monetary policy in the economy?
Should the modern President have imperial power and treat the Congress and Courts as advisors to...
Should the modern President have imperial power and treat the Congress and Courts as advisors to implement his orders to get things done. Or should we go back to the Constitutional idea that Congress, specifically the House, be the governor of the country and protector of the people with the President staying out of domestic issues?
The goal of Chapter 2 is to give students an understanding of which courts have power...
The goal of Chapter 2 is to give students an understanding of which courts have power to hear what disputes and when. Hence, the first major concept introduced in this chapter is jurisdiction. Jurisdiction generally involves 3 components: subject matter; territory; and person(s). Take for instance a city court like 36th District Court in Detroit. By statute, 36th District Court has jurisdiction over landlord/tenant disputes, civil cases, subject to dollar limitations, garnishments, misdemeanor trials, felony arraignments, and traffic cases, among...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT