Do the Courts have too much power to make policy from the bench? Consider issues such...

Do the Courts have too much power to make policy from the bench? Consider issues such as abortion, equal access to education, the use of religious symbols in public schools, etc. Should decisions on controversial issues like these be made by Courts or by Legislators? Why? Illustrate your answer with your own research.

Expert Solution

The judicial system keeps a check on the legislature thru judicial activism . In fact, it is their responsibility to resolve such issues which trouble the society. According to the advocates of this notion , the judicial system intervenes only when the parliament fails to do its job. The government may consume too much time in enacting a law relating to certain contentious / debatable social reforms.

According to a different viewpoint, judicial activism is inconsistent to the notion of separation of powers.

The legislature is elected by the populace, & the elected reps are assigned the role of legislating. On the other hand, the members of the judicial system aren’t elected by the populace, & aren’t meant to legislate. The judiciary can be indiscriminate / unfair. Although the government has 3 organs, the courts have the ultimate say in issues of dispute. There’s no other authority higher than the Supreme Court. Hence, restraint is desirable when applying that power.
In brief, both the notions of judicial activism & judicial restraint have their own pros & cons. However, juries nullifying any unconstitutional laws for protecting public interest can’t be considered as intrusion into the dominion of the legislature

keosha answered 1 week ago

Do the Courts have too much power to make policy from the bench? Consider issues such...

Do the Courts have too much power to make policy from the bench? Consider issues such as abortion, equal access to education, the use of religious symbols in public schools, etc. Should decisions on controversial issues like these be made by Courts or by Legislators? Why? Illustrate your answer with your own research.

Do you think the president has too much power as Commander In Chief? Not enough power?...

Do you think the president has too much power as Commander In Chief? Not enough power? Do you believe the War Powers Act to be constitutional or unconstitutional?

Discuss whether administrative agencies have too much power. Why or why not?

20. In a survey, three out of four students said that courts show too much concern...

20. In a survey, three out of four students said that courts show too much concern for criminals. Of seventy randomly selected students Would 68 be considered an unusually high number of students who feel that courts are partial to criminals? A. The correct answer is not among the choices. B. Yes, because P(X ≥ 68) ≤ .05 C. Yes, because P(X ≤ 68) ≤ .05 D. No,because P(X≥68)≤.05 E. No,because P(X≤68)≤.05 21. In a survey, three out of four...

Make a list of what you would consider too much to self-disclose on a first date....

Make a list of what you would consider too much to self-disclose on a first date. Compare and evaluate what you thought was acceptable. Are there some items on your list that you should reconsider as appropriate? Write at least a one-page overview of your findings.

What presumption do the courts make in commercial agreements?

1. Does the FED have too much power on international arena? 2. Does the FED abuse...

1. Does the FED have too much power on international arena? 2. Does the FED abuse its power? 3. How can the FED influence global economy?

what point is there too much intervention by the FED into monetary policy in the economy?

Should the modern President have imperial power and treat the Congress and Courts as advisors to...

Should the modern President have imperial power and treat the Congress and Courts as advisors to implement his orders to get things done. Or should we go back to the Constitutional idea that Congress, specifically the House, be the governor of the country and protector of the people with the President staying out of domestic issues?

The goal of Chapter 2 is to give students an understanding of which courts have power...

The goal of Chapter 2 is to give students an understanding of which courts have power to hear what disputes and when. Hence, the first major concept introduced in this chapter is jurisdiction. Jurisdiction generally involves 3 components: subject matter; territory; and person(s). Take for instance a city court like 36th District Court in Detroit. By statute, 36th District Court has jurisdiction over landlord/tenant disputes, civil cases, subject to dollar limitations, garnishments, misdemeanor trials, felony arraignments, and traffic cases, among...

Question

Do the Courts have too much power to make policy from the bench? Consider issues such...

Solutions

Expert Solution

Related Solutions

Do the Courts have too much power to make policy from the bench? Consider issues such...

Do you think the president has too much power as Commander In Chief? Not enough power?...

Discuss whether administrative agencies have too much power. Why or why not?

20. In a survey, three out of four students said that courts show too much concern...

Make a list of what you would consider too much to self-disclose on a first date....

What presumption do the courts make in commercial agreements?

1. Does the FED have too much power on international arena? 2. Does the FED abuse...

what point is there too much intervention by the FED into monetary policy in the economy?

Should the modern President have imperial power and treat the Congress and Courts as advisors to...

The goal of Chapter 2 is to give students an understanding of which courts have power...