Question

In: Economics

Should the modern President have imperial power and treat the Congress and Courts as advisors to...

Should the modern President have imperial power and treat the Congress and Courts as advisors to implement his orders to get things done. Or should we go back to the Constitutional idea that Congress, specifically the House, be the governor of the country and protector of the people with the President staying out of domestic issues?

Solutions

Expert Solution

Dear Student,

Please find below answer to your question

Abstract

The Imperial Presidency can play an importatant role while performing enormous discretionary power to respond to national security crises and uncertain dangers is concentrated in the office of the president

The president can issue rules, regulations, and instructions called executive orders, which have the some important force of law upon federal agencies but do not require approval of the United States Congress.

A) The Presidency and the Imperial Power

It does not set any term limits on how long a person may continue to serve as president but out the basic requirements that one must have in order to become president: Presidents have power over U.S. diplomacy and have surpassed Congress in or dictatorial areas, raising legal and ethical questions regarding its use.

The president can influences control over the bureaucracy by:

  1. Appointing agency directors and subheads with Senate approval issuing executive orders compelling an agency to do or not do something.
  2. Increasing or decreasing an agency's budget through the Office of Management and Budget

President should have imperial power due to following main reasons :

The president had the responsibilities to conduct ongoing wars and ongoing foreign relations, and to respond to sudden attacks if Congress were not in session. As the United States became a great world power and then a superpower, the presidency acquired more war powers despite the Constitution

The Imperial power gives the president of the United States the power to run the executive branch and to issue executive orders. Imperial power comes from the Constitution and the acts passed by Congress

Another reason to predict a bright future for the Imperial Presidency is that the principle of pre-emptive warfare as a central strategy to protect against terrorist attack. Even more than the Cold War policy of containment did, this strategy tends to concentrate power in the executive

Therefore Modern President should have imperial power and treat the Congress and Courts as advisors to implement his orders to get things done

B) Following are the main reasons why we should not go back to constitutional ideas

  1. Four relevant powers denied to Congress in the U.S. Constitution namely 1. the Writ of Habeas Corpus 2. Bills of Attainder and Ex Post Facto Laws 3. Export Taxes and 4. the Port Preference Clause
  2. The Constitution provides that an amendment may be proposed either by the Congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the State legislatures.
  3. The U.S. Constitution gave the federal government more power and allowed them to effectively levy tariffs. Laws were passed and they had to be followed. The U.S. Constitution influenced the constitutions of many nations.
  4. The Constitution created checks and balances and there is no any role of congress while implementing this laws.

If you like the answer, Kindly up vote

Thank You !!


Related Solutions

what is the existing balance of power between congress and the president?
what is the existing balance of power between congress and the president?
What is the Impeachment Power of Congress? How does it work? Should The House have brought...
What is the Impeachment Power of Congress? How does it work? Should The House have brought impeachment charges against President Trump? Why or why not?  
Should courts treat certain crimes people often see as “victimless,” such as drug possession crimes and...
Should courts treat certain crimes people often see as “victimless,” such as drug possession crimes and prostitution, differently than other offenses? What about offenses that are technically minor, such as shoplifting small-value items, but are not victimless (i.e., the retailer is hurt)? Should legislatures set different kinds of ranges for these types of offenses or make more diversion options available?
Where does the modern president get his/her power? 2 paragraphs
Where does the modern president get his/her power? 2 paragraphs
6.    When and how have they attempted to reassert congressional power over foreign policy?  Should the president have...
6.    When and how have they attempted to reassert congressional power over foreign policy?  Should the president have more control over foreign policy?  Why or why not?
The US President Donald Trump and his advisors have repeatedly said that they intended to get...
The US President Donald Trump and his advisors have repeatedly said that they intended to get rid of the US trade deficit. Question 01: As of April 8th 2018, list the goods and the countries for which the US has decided to create new tariffs. For these goods, what are the amounts currently imported by the US? (Words 250) Question 02: List the US goods for which China has decided to create new tariffs. For these goods, what are the...
The goal of Chapter 2 is to give students an understanding of which courts have power...
The goal of Chapter 2 is to give students an understanding of which courts have power to hear what disputes and when. Hence, the first major concept introduced in this chapter is jurisdiction. Jurisdiction generally involves 3 components: subject matter; territory; and person(s). Take for instance a city court like 36th District Court in Detroit. By statute, 36th District Court has jurisdiction over landlord/tenant disputes, civil cases, subject to dollar limitations, garnishments, misdemeanor trials, felony arraignments, and traffic cases, among...
Do the Courts have too much power to make policy from the bench? Consider issues such...
Do the Courts have too much power to make policy from the bench? Consider issues such as abortion, equal access to education, the use of religious symbols in public schools, etc. Should decisions on controversial issues like these be made by Courts or by Legislators? Why? Illustrate your answer with your own research.
Do the Courts have too much power to make policy from the bench? Consider issues such...
Do the Courts have too much power to make policy from the bench? Consider issues such as abortion, equal access to education, the use of religious symbols in public schools, etc. Should decisions on controversial issues like these be made by Courts or by Legislators? Why? Illustrate your answer with your own research.
At times, politicians have argued that we should have a law that requires Congress to balance...
At times, politicians have argued that we should have a law that requires Congress to balance the federal budget. Some politicians believe this is the fiscally responsible approach while others think it is better to allow the federal government the leeway to determine the budget based on the state of the economy. Some politicians worry about running a deficit as this will add to the federal debt. Most states in the US have balanced budgets. What are the arguments for...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT