Question

The argument against Procreative Beneficence (PB) based on varieties is as follows:

P1. If we practice PB and select the best genes, then there won’t be good varieties.

P2. We should have varieties.
C. Therefore, we shouldn’t practice PB and select the best genes.

Suppose the technique of genetic modification is at least as advanced as what is shown in Gattaca. One reply to this argument is based on distinguishing between government-directed eugenics and individual-directed eugenics. Elaborate on this reply. (4?) Raise a worry about this reply. You are encouraged to use your own examples to support your claim. (6?)

Answer 1

P1

PB is a current raising topic with ethical issues as well as biological, but PB give us the option to choose what we want. The first argument showing some disputes and opposite theories , if we select good genes it means we can select best rather than good so the verities of genes will be shrink because everyone will demand good qualities so that we will experience same genes further.

The natural selection provides varieties and natural beauty which made diverse world, if we go for PB, we will lose natural process of selection and diversity.

P2

We must understand that if we don’t have varieties, the possibilities of mass or whole destruction of species will increase, so we need varieties to make diverse world. If ever we get the probability of any epidemic disease the chance of surviving will be greater than single variety.

P3

Above statements do not insist us not to practice PB, but we must practice parallel rather than create new and edit genes. The use of PB can enhance quality of life and health, it can also be used in the area of disease control and cure of heredity syndromes rather than form new human or animal species. If we stop practice PB, it would be hurdle for medical science but if we used it for personal benefits, it would be harmful for whole mankind.