In: Statistics and Probability
A supervisor in the Department of Rehabilitive Services is
critical of the performance of one of her counselors.
The counselor is expected to arrange job training for those in need
of vocational rehabilitation so that they may find
employment. Yet the counselor has managed to place just
over 30% of his clients. The counselor argues that he is doing a
good job and that the reason for his overall low rate of placement
is that most of his clients are severely disabled, which makes them
very difficult to place.
The counselor’s case load is presented in the accompanying
table. Percentage the table
appropriately, and evaluate who is correct -- the supervisor or the
counselor?
Job Placement |
Not Severely Disabled |
Severely Disabled |
Not Placed |
42 |
100 |
Placed |
24 |
40 |
Compute the value of the chi-square for the data in the table
above. From these data, would you say that the relationship between
level of disability and whether or not they are placed is weak or
strong? Explain your answer....There are good examples in the book
for how to do this, so don't leave any valuable points on the
table! (Or, use the Excel spreadsheet in the resources.)
a) Calculate the expected frequencies, the deviations (observed -
expected). Square the deviation and divide by the
expected frequencies
(in other words, calculate (O-E)2/E. Then
sum to an overall measure of discrepancy.
b) Convert the Chi-square into a p-value using degrees of freedom
(d.f.) = (c-1)(r-1)
c) Is your p-value sufficiently small to reject Ho at alpha =
.05? In other words, is there enough statistical
evidence for a difference in visits based on disability status?
using excel we have
Chi-Square Test | ||||||
Observed Frequencies | ||||||
Disabled | Calculations | |||||
Job lacement | Not surely | Surely | Total | fo-fe | ||
Not placed | 42 | 100 | 142 | -3.49515 | 3.495146 | |
Placed | 24 | 40 | 64 | 3.495146 | -3.49515 | |
Total | 66 | 140 | 206 | |||
Expected Frequencies | ||||||
Disabled | ||||||
Job lacement | Not surely | Surely | Total | (fo-fe)^2/fe | ||
Not placed | 45.49515 | 96.50485 | 142 | 0.268513 | 0.126585 | |
Placed | 20.50485 | 43.49515 | 64 | 0.595763 | 0.28086 | |
Total | 66 | 140 | 206 | |||
Data | ||||||
Level of Significance | 0.05 | |||||
Number of Rows | 2 | |||||
Number of Columns | 2 | |||||
Degrees of Freedom | 1 | |||||
Results | ||||||
Critical Value | 3.841459 | |||||
Chi-Square Test Statistic | 1.271721 | |||||
p-Value | 0.259444 | |||||
Do not reject the null hypothesis |
a) the expected frequencies are given in table
b) the Chi-square into a p-value using degrees of freedom is
1
c) p value is 0.2594 ,No p-value is not sufficiently small to
reject Ho at alpha = .05. there is not enough statistical evidence
for a difference in visits based on disability status?